EPTgg
[IEM] Guangzhou - Day 4 - Final Day - Page 161
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Keep enjoying the games. In advance, if you OP whine, see you in a while. If you post well, hopefully see a lot more of you :D <3 | ||
|
ypslala
Burma545 Posts
gg | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20321 Posts
| ||
|
Dominico
Canada678 Posts
| ||
|
zyzski
United States698 Posts
| ||
|
tuho12345
4482 Posts
On October 04 2011 14:59 rdj107 wrote: Think it more stems from the gigantic balance whine that was tl's summary article about the puma vs mc iem finals; kinda like the green light for protoss players to bitch en masse about puma's tvp and puma himself. Same thing you can say about IdrA's fanboy every time IdrA lost right?  | ||
|
Moralez
Portugal1857 Posts
On October 04 2011 15:00 samd wrote: i dont understand why people aren't even considering the possibility that puma threw the games. I mean I don't 100% believe it but I could see it happening. Puma doesn't gain anything from winning. EG gets tons of publicity from their most talked about and famous player winning. Idra hasn't put together a good result in a while. And then there's this tweet: http://i.imgur.com/ssWYE.png I mean it probably was legitimate games, but to instantly cuss out those raising questions is ignorant. This type of thing has happened in esports tons of times before. Another troll already mention fixed matches. You came a lil bit too late :\ | ||
|
TheNessman
United States4158 Posts
| ||
|
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
On October 04 2011 15:00 samd wrote: i dont understand why people aren't even considering the possibility that puma threw the games. I mean I don't 100% believe it but I could see it happening. Puma doesn't gain anything from winning. EG gets tons of publicity from their most talked about and famous player winning. Idra hasn't put together a good result in a while. And then there's this tweet: http://i.imgur.com/ssWYE.png I mean it probably was legitimate games, but to instantly cuss out those raising questions is ignorant. This type of thing has happened in esports tons of times before. You think that after the BW fiasco players would dare to throw games? And there would be a tweet about it? Haters gonna hate. Fuck off. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
| ||
|
jnsjr
United States461 Posts
On October 04 2011 15:00 samd wrote: i dont understand why people aren't even considering the possibility that puma threw the games. I mean I don't 100% believe it but I could see it happening. Puma doesn't gain anything from winning. EG gets tons of publicity from their most talked about and famous player winning. Idra hasn't put together a good result in a while. And then there's this tweet: http://i.imgur.com/ssWYE.png I mean it probably was legitimate games, but to instantly cuss out those raising questions is ignorant. This type of thing has happened in esports tons of times before. Lol, throw a b05 series by losing 3-0? Wouldn't it make more sense to make it a little closer? Just sayin | ||
|
nvs.
Canada3609 Posts
| ||
|
Thrax
Canada1755 Posts
| ||
|
PHILtheTANK
United States1834 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11075 Posts
double forge from hasu +1 +1 Puma's taken a 3rd in this. 165-190ish +2+2 75% done for puma Dancing about emp but doesnt hit the money units. Big engagement dancing back and forth doing nothing by hasu. Storms that needed to go off from slow high templar are sniped before they reach storming position. Puma easily rolls over hasu. | ||
|
TheNessman
United States4158 Posts
On October 04 2011 15:01 Cyro wrote: It is so hard to actuly hit anything with storm :\ sc2 storm sucks | ||
|
icarly
United States400 Posts
On October 04 2011 15:00 ypslala wrote: ok 1 emp toss dead gg 40+ supply lead too, i think that's a bit more important lol. | ||
|
Techno
1900 Posts
| ||
|
Pyre
United States1940 Posts
 | ||
|
Ahelvin
France1866 Posts
PumA has INCREDIBLE mouse control  . | ||
|
Arco
United States2090 Posts
On October 04 2011 15:00 ypslala wrote: ok 1 emp toss dead gg yeah all it takes is one when you're that far behind | ||
| ||
