Is Moletrap trying to say they sort of called this happening? After he was massively dismissive of both Jjakji and Check at the start of the broadcast? lol >_>

At least Doa stuck up for them a bit.

KimJongChill

United States6429 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3146

On September 07 2011 22:50 Azzur wrote:

Show nested quote +

What was wrong with the format? The players went 3-1 because they deserved to. Nothing more, nothing less.

It's so hard to get into code S, but so easy to drop into code A and the only reason the format is the way it is now is just to accommodate foreigners. Bo1 is very unforgiving, too. Sure, the players who performed better won, but that doesn't mean that I can't criticize the format for what I perceive are flaws.

FairForever

Canada2392 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3147

Nightmare scenario: What if all 5 players go 2-2?

Giriath

Sweden2412 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3148

On September 07 2011 22:52 garlicface wrote:

Show nested quote +

If Code S had Up & Down format, everyone would be jumping for joy.

The days would be longer, but the more games they have to play to advance the better the odds are for the better players to come through.

SafeAsCheese

United States4924 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3149

How many T Z P in Code S now?

sleepingdog

Austria6145 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3150

On September 07 2011 22:52 ch33psh33p wrote:
Lol @ idiots saying going 3-0 in a round robin group of 5 should be good enough.

Its a group of 5 for a reason, you play FOUR games. So what if you go 3-0 to start? all that means is that you played more games FIRST.

Check, Losira, and Jjakji ALL WENT 3-1.

There is NO PROBLEM HERE. They had the identical EXACT SAME FUCKING RECORDS.

Tiebreakers weeded out the lesser of the three, and that was Check.

Jesus, chill...nobody's saying that it's unfair...

alan25

United States379 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3151

a month ago... mc: "i pick mvp in my group" durrrr

kaetor

New Zealand292 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3152

The thing is, there is no 3-0. It's 3-1. Saying he went 3-0 is like saying he went 1-0, and that doesn't even make sense.

Definately think that LosirA and jjakji looked more solid then Check and deserve the spot, but it was entertaining and he played well.

danson

United States689 Posts

September 07 2011 13:54 GMT

#3153

i couldnt be less excited about code s finals : (

just wanna watch updown matches all day

_vladimir_

Serbia530 Posts

September 07 2011 13:55 GMT

#3154

Wow poor Check...yeah i agree its fair, they all played same amount of games, im not qqing, im just sad because it went upside down from him so hard

(c what i did there - upside down in up and downs?) :D

Azzur

Australia6260 Posts

September 07 2011 13:55 GMT

#3155

But one thing about the up-and-down format that I don't like though... your qualification fate is possibly dependent on someone else. In the old format, your fate was entirely in your own hands. This is one reason is don't like round-robins.

garlicface

Canada4196 Posts

September 07 2011 13:55 GMT

#3156

On September 07 2011 22:54 kaetor wrote:
The thing is, there is no 3-0. It's 3-1. Saying he went 3-0 is like saying he went 1-0, and that doesn't even make sense.

Definately think that LosirA and jjakji looked more solid then Check and deserve the spot, but it was entertaining and he played well.

It CAN make sense though. Here's a 3-0:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=262855

ch33psh33p

7650 Posts

September 07 2011 13:56 GMT

#3157

On September 07 2011 22:54 sleepingdog wrote:

Show nested quote +

Jesus, chill...nobody's saying that it's unfair...

You need to read closer at the people criticizing the format, saying Check went 3-0 and that should be good enough.

Just rediculous, its like people are illiterate. 3-1 ISNT 3-0.