EPT[IEM] Gamescom - Day 5 - Page 282
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Please keep the following things out of this topic: -Caster/Stream/player bashing; -Imbalance/race whine; -LoL vs the world arguments; -'Omfg cant believe people aren't watching SPL finals' comments; -any other assorted offtopic negativism and arguments. Enjoy this free multiday/multigame event that has been provided to you. Share your enthusiasm for the games! Feel free to shoot me a PM or query me on IRC for any questions or comments. Have fun! ~Nyovne [special edit: Any more derailing over the fact that someone made a Germany vs Poland WW2 joke after page 21 will be met with a week ban.] | ||
|
SnuggleKittens
Australia57 Posts
| ||
|
fenrysk
United States364 Posts
On August 22 2011 08:38 pezit wrote: MC just plays on that razors edge, he just barely has enough to hold stuff off and when he makes a single mistake it fails and he dies. This is why he looks like a genius when it works out for him and why people feel as if he was the better player even though he lost, i most definitely think he's a better player than Puma is. makes for more entertaining games i suppose. i look forward to watching the replays Grats to Puma, but i am sad a little that MC has come so close to the big finish many times on the international scene | ||
|
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
OMG I LOST TO INFESTORS? LOL THEY'LL GET NERFED AND ZERG WILL SUCK AGAIN. OMG 1/1/1 TIMING TOO OP MULES OP OMG 4 GATE OP OMG DEATHBALL OP Like, come on. This is getting so fucking sad to read every single damn day. I've been posting on MLG ever since 2009, and lurking it a lot longer, so I was a bit saddened when I noticed the lack of SC2 action on there. But I realized that's because TL was so solidified and professional, there was no need. You guys are deteriorating rapidly, well at least the SC2 section seems to be. /rant Grats to Puma, they both made mistakes. MC needed to keep up on upgrades in that second game, and why no guardian shieeldd? He needed more sentries. | ||
|
FataLe
New Zealand4559 Posts
On August 22 2011 07:10 eloist wrote: A 150 Protoss death ball is far from impotent vs. a 200 supply zerg army. I think you mean potent? | ||
|
FataLe
New Zealand4559 Posts
On August 22 2011 09:16 kodas wrote: 3 protosses in the round of 4 and you guys still find some way to complain, the best player won....nothing else to say. hauahuaha. oh, you're silly.  | ||
|
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
No he meant impotent, a death ball is FAR from impotent.... | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
jinixxx123
543 Posts
you know, this build might be strong, but at the same token everyone here universally agrees only a korean terran can pull it off, and what is a korean terran? a machine, not a human, a machine. The fact of the matter is, puma is a fucking beast, mc hasnt been doing that well lately (3 gsls hes had terrible performance in, he even goes to pick mvp in his group. he lost to alica in one gsl, then to hongun, and now to mvp/polt ) The dude while good, isnt the best and has been in a little slump ( hence why he said hes limiting his foreign tournaments cause he himself said hes lacking practice ) Now on to a more proper question is, How do you expect blizzard to truely do anything on a 1/1/1 build. If you change anything you can seriously mess up the entire terran tech tree. Can someone answer me why Mana 2-0 puma, yet because mc cant beat him, its "terribly imba", this is not some random terran, this is PUMA, flashes practise partner, the ballest terran of them all, not even MVP can contest puma, u guys just wait and see , hes going to rape everything. Im very sad his win is getting discredited as imbalance. I guess his lack of 111's in nasl final was the reason he won to ? | ||
|
Khi
Germany188 Posts
On August 22 2011 11:09 jinixxx123 wrote: protoss wont be happy until every final is 4 protoss battling it out in mirror. :D you know, this build might be strong, but at the same token everyone here universally agrees only a korean terran can pull it off, and what is a korean terran? a machine, not a human, a machine. The fact of the matter is, puma is a fucking beast, mc hasnt been doing that well lately (3 gsls hes had terrible performance in, he even goes to pick mvp in his group. he lost to alica in one gsl, then to some zerg, and now to mvp/polt ) The dude while good, isnt the best and has been in a little slump ( hence why he said hes limiting his foreign tournaments cause he himself said hes lacking practice ) Now on to a more proper question is, How do you expect blizzard to truely do anything on a 1/1/1 build. If you change anything you can seriously mess up the entire terran tech tree. Can someone answer me why Mana 2-0 puma, yet because mc cant beat him, its "terribly imba", this is not some random terran, this is PUMA, flashes practise partner, the ballest terran of them all, not even MVP can contest puma, u guys just wait and see , hes going to rape everything. I agree with you. | ||
|
rakoth
Greece55 Posts
| ||
|
Spiders
United States86 Posts
| ||
|
Gatored
United States679 Posts
On August 22 2011 11:09 jinixxx123 wrote: protoss wont be happy until every final is 4 protoss battling it out in mirror. :D you know, this build might be strong, but at the same token everyone here universally agrees only a korean terran can pull it off, and what is a korean terran? a machine, not a human, a machine. The fact of the matter is, puma is a fucking beast, mc hasnt been doing that well lately (3 gsls hes had terrible performance in, he even goes to pick mvp in his group. he lost to alica in one gsl, then to hongun, and now to mvp/polt ) The dude while good, isnt the best and has been in a little slump ( hence why he said hes limiting his foreign tournaments cause he himself said hes lacking practice ) Now on to a more proper question is, How do you expect blizzard to truely do anything on a 1/1/1 build. If you change anything you can seriously mess up the entire terran tech tree. Can someone answer me why Mana 2-0 puma, yet because mc cant beat him, its "terribly imba", this is not some random terran, this is PUMA, flashes practise partner, the ballest terran of them all, not even MVP can contest puma, u guys just wait and see , hes going to rape everything. Im very sad his win is getting discredited as imbalance. I guess his lack of 111's in nasl final was the reason he won to ? Will people stop bringing up the fact that MaNa 2-0'd PuMa? FFS they were completely different sets of games. PuMa 1/1/1 all-in'd MC twice and played 2 macro games against MaNa (I repeat, did not all-in mana). I highly doubt MC would have been 3-0'd in macro games. Completely different cases so you cannot compare them. | ||
|
Meta
United States6228 Posts
On August 22 2011 11:27 Gatored wrote: Will people stop bringing up the fact that MaNa 2-0'd PuMa? FFS they were completely different sets of games. PuMa 1/1/1 all-in'd MC twice and played 2 macro games against MaNa (I repeat, did not all-in mana). I highly doubt MC would have been 3-0'd in macro games. Completely different cases so you cannot compare them. If you want to get into this it's so easy to say that, based on that logic, protoss > terran in macro games, and that's why puma decided that 1-1-1 allin is the only way to beat good protosses. What would protoss have to say about that? | ||
|
Jacobs Ladder
United States1705 Posts
On August 22 2011 11:38 Meta wrote: You're ignoring the fact that he considers a two time GSL winner to be a superior player to a player who never got into Code A. The point is that people feel like 1-1-1 lets lesser players consistently win.If you want to get into this it's so easy to say that, based on that logic, protoss > terran in macro games, and that's why puma decided that 1-1-1 allin is the only way to beat good protosses. What would protoss have to say about that? | ||
|
Phtes
United States370 Posts
| ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On August 22 2011 11:09 jinixxx123 wrote: protoss wont be happy until every final is 4 protoss battling it out in mirror. :D you know, this build might be strong, but at the same token everyone here universally agrees only a korean terran can pull it off, and what is a korean terran? a machine, not a human, a machine. The fact of the matter is, puma is a fucking beast, mc hasnt been doing that well lately (3 gsls hes had terrible performance in, he even goes to pick mvp in his group. he lost to alica in one gsl, then to hongun, and now to mvp/polt ) The dude while good, isnt the best and has been in a little slump ( hence why he said hes limiting his foreign tournaments cause he himself said hes lacking practice ) Now on to a more proper question is, How do you expect blizzard to truely do anything on a 1/1/1 build. If you change anything you can seriously mess up the entire terran tech tree. Can someone answer me why Mana 2-0 puma, yet because mc cant beat him, its "terribly imba", this is not some random terran, this is PUMA, flashes practise partner, the ballest terran of them all, not even MVP can contest puma, u guys just wait and see , hes going to rape everything. Im very sad his win is getting discredited as imbalance. I guess his lack of 111's in nasl final was the reason he won to ? To be fair, if you nerfed either Banshees or PDD (make it require research), you really wouldn't hurt Terran tech in any way. That said, I wouldn't support either ideas. | ||
|
trikshun
United States437 Posts
On August 22 2011 11:45 Jacobs Ladder wrote: You're ignoring the fact that he considers a two time GSL winner to be a superior player to a player who never got into Code A. The point is that people feel like 1-1-1 lets lesser players consistently win. He beat MC straight up at NASL. PuMa would probably be code A by now but he didn't participate in the last qualifiers | ||
|
CuSToM
United States1478 Posts
 | ||
|
Phtes
United States370 Posts
On August 22 2011 12:00 CuSToM wrote: Game 1 is on youtube.... are games 2 and 3 out there? Nope been watching the guy who did Game 1 in english but he hasnt done the others.. They are up on youtube though in french | ||
|
Whiteman103
United States1070 Posts
On August 22 2011 11:58 trikshun wrote: He beat MC straight up at NASL. PuMa would probably be code A by now but he didn't participate in the last qualifiers yea and MC got into GSL befor there even was a code S/A when it was much eaiser to get GSL then it is now. inControl made it to the last round and lost 1-2 and he was not insane back then but a soild player. the quifier were super easy then Idra and TLO both said so if u watch the Vids artosis put up of them going to the GSL quifiers. Just becauser your not Code a or s doesnt mean your not better then players in code a/s. DRG was not Code A untill last qualifier. | ||
| ||
