| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
LoKi-
United States121 Posts
On August 20 2011 13:55 Garnet wrote: So anti-climatic. Blizzard needs to implement a LAN version for tournaments really. While of course I agree, a LAN wouldn't have changed anything, considering both of these players aren't actually at the event (they are 2 of 3 players who couldn't make it.) | ||
|
Modernist
United States89 Posts
On August 20 2011 13:56 MaleficOR wrote: These 2 players are not at the event so LAN wouldn't have helped in this situation. They are there in person, in booths even.  | ||
|
Oboeman
Canada3980 Posts
so I don't know which way that would go. | ||
|
DJams
United States447 Posts
On August 20 2011 13:56 MaleficOR wrote: These 2 players are not at the event so LAN wouldn't have helped in this situation. Not Quiet True, They could use something like Hamachi or Tungle to reduce the lag/disc if SC2 had LAN. | ||
|
hitpoint
United States1511 Posts
On August 20 2011 13:59 Modernist wrote: They are there in person, in booths even. They were both unable to make it and playing from home. | ||
|
Steelavocado
United States2123 Posts
On August 20 2011 13:59 Modernist wrote: They are there in person, in booths even. No I think you are mistaken. They are not at the event. They were unable to attend the event so they were playing online from their houses/lounges/gaming studio's. | ||
|
NinerB
United States52 Posts
On August 20 2011 13:59 Modernist wrote: They are there in person, in booths even. No these 2 aren't they are both playing remotely since they couldn't be there. | ||
|
NinerB
United States52 Posts
On August 20 2011 14:00 DJams wrote: Not Quiet True, They could use something like Hamachi or Tungle to reduce the lag/disc if SC2 had LAN. Not true, this was a clear disc, meaning one player lost connection completely. | ||
|
samd
United States77 Posts
| ||
|
DJams
United States447 Posts
| ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On August 20 2011 14:03 DJams wrote: Also, why don't they just move on to the Next match up? there will be plenty time to find that missing internet player after the next game. It would just be informal to play out of order. Besides, the game after this one could potentially be match point, which creates a different mindset. | ||
|
Deadpoetic0077
United States63 Posts
On August 20 2011 14:02 samd wrote: cool cordstomp from cowsrule yeaaa... thats kinda what it looked like | ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
On August 20 2011 14:02 NinerB wrote: Not true, this was a clear disc, meaning one player lost connection completely. Well turns out Cowsrule's comp crashed, so no sort of better connection would help XD. I still don't think that changes the fact that lan should be implemented though... On August 20 2011 14:07 Deadpoetic0077 wrote: yeaaa... thats kinda what it looked like Oh come on. Regardless of what happens, $5,000 are going to get donated to a good cause one way or another. I doubt he would deliberately disconnect. | ||
|
bobwhiz
United States725 Posts
| ||
|
ballasdontcry
Canada595 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11099 Posts
It IISSSSS | ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
| ||
|
Steelavocado
United States2123 Posts
| ||
|
Soluhwin
United States1287 Posts
| ||
|
Shootist
Singapore405 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 RotterdaM StarCraft: Brood War 832ByuN  399TKL  377IndyStarCraft  239BRAT_OK  62JuggernautJason58 Trap 44MindelVK 17EnDerr  11Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Korean StarCraft League
GSL
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
