|
On July 04 2011 15:37 AnonymousNoobs wrote:
Game 1 of Destiny vs Bomber is a must watch. Probably the most back and forth game until the end.
+ Show Spoiler +Destiny definitely made a comeback, but once he was ahead I think he stayed ahead. He was down in food at several points, but his economy was such that it wasn't really a problem. Making 15 infestor and oodles of lings in 1 cycle is crazy.
But yeah, a must watch. I watched it yesterday just before going to bed and didn't expect to see a 40 minutes game (ca. 55 in game mins)
|
|
|
The dates are messed up, the 7th is a Thursday not a Sunday..
|
|
|
It says I'm 4th and the person who doesn't have a north america account is first...
|
This is the most complicated tournament to follow, ever.
|
On July 07 2011 00:38 bennyaus wrote:
This is the most complicated tournament to follow, ever.
Agreed.
Very bad organized.
|
Seems like they are not ordered after winnings etc but simply by the number you signed up. Standings are important at the end imo. Not much to see yet
|
On July 07 2011 01:52 Hondelul wrote:Seems like they are not ordered after winnings etc but simply by the number you signed up. Standings are important at the end imo. Not much to see yet
ahhh I didn't even notice that... I figured I was in second because I had 2 wins and 1 forfeit win while the other guy had 2 wins.
|
just talked to nerchio, against byun he
+ Show Spoiler + won 2-1
hmm
he did
2 x 2 rax
1 time i died easily
second time i defended
then he did 4 rax
he came back to his base
and it was like 15 minute macro game
he played better than most europeans because
when i had broods
he had few vikings and like 6-7 ghost
but i won
and last game was macro ~20 min
pretty impressive, byun is extremely good, one of the KRs who blow me away with their strategic decision-making
|
Standings are in order from top to bottom. The issues with rank are resulting from forfeit wins. Which do not equate as actual wins.
ps. "s" stands for streak.
|
On July 07 2011 01:44 ceaRshaf wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 00:38 bennyaus wrote:
This is the most complicated tournament to follow, ever. Agreed. Very bad organized.
I don't really like to whine too much about tournaments as I'm not putting my time/money into it but it's really unclear who's playing and when, I want to follow this as there's some great matchups but you're making it quite difficult for me to do so.
|
On July 07 2011 01:52 Hondelul wrote:Seems like they are not ordered after winnings etc but simply by the number you signed up. Standings are important at the end imo. Not much to see yet
Wait a minute, those are the ranks of players not the order in which they signed up.
|
On July 07 2011 03:32 CEVO Ahn wrote:
Standings are in order from top to bottom. The issues with rank are resulting from forfeit wins. Which do not equate as actual wins.
ps. "s" stands for streak.
STREAK! Lolololol...i couldn't figure it out for the life of me. XD <3 <3
PS. Don't listen to all the whiners. I'm very impressed with this tourney so far, and none of us on the outside have any clue what is really going on.
Side note: all you whiners...keep whining. You will really give them a good reason to want to run this tourney again. (whenever that may be). /sarcasm
|
So like most of my group is forfeit(7 ) theres gonna be 4 of us with the same record.
what do we do in that case? what happen in that situation?
|
On July 07 2011 15:10 theBullFrog wrote:
So like most of my group is forfeit(7 ) theres gonna be 4 of us with the same record.
what do we do in that case? what happen in that situation?
Don't worry about situations that might happen in the future. When group play is done and you are worried about how the standings have ended then you can ask questions. It would be very unlikely you guys would trade wins in such a way that all 4 players have the exact same record.
|
Hahaha, I feel good.
It says that I'm rank 8 out of 9,000
|
Personally i dont believe that forfeit wins should not count as actual wins. If a guy shows up for 1 date and doesnt for another it messes things up quite a bit because some people can have more actual wins/games than others. besides, it would be much easier to organize if rankings counted the ff wins i believe
|
On July 07 2011 12:55 GreEny K wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2011 01:52 Hondelul wrote:Seems like they are not ordered after winnings etc but simply by the number you signed up. Standings are important at the end imo. Not much to see yet Wait a minute, those are the ranks of players not the order in which they signed up.
Oh, you are right. It made sence in my head but it seems it talked shit, sorry. I´m out of here 
|
Agreed.
Very bad organized.
I think they should have hired some people with experience running large/complicated tournaments, seems like they are trying to go this alone. Well admirable I have pretty much given up on following this event because of how confusing it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
