EPTOn May 14 2011 16:37 Maghetti wrote:
NesTea did say he had been playing on NA recently, maybe it was preparing for Inca's skill level?
NesTea did say he had been playing on NA recently, maybe it was preparing for Inca's skill level?
Lol
[GSL] Grand Finals - Code S May - Page 141
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Krosta
Norway437 Posts
Lol | ||
|
mierin
United States4943 Posts
| ||
|
dambros
Brazil432 Posts
| ||
|
TehForce
1072 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:37 LoLAdriankat wrote: Inca's play is so bad that you can't use this set as an indicator of balance. qft inca is losing because he makes significant mistakes EVERY game, not because p is underpowered. | ||
|
Butterz
688 Posts
| ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4139 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:34 Pajegetc wrote: Epic Fail by Rain Getting to Ro4 on his only good Matchup(PvP) Then cheesing twice then lucky against a superior player. Basically the story of his tournament. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:37 NexUmbra wrote: PvP Rain is bad. and he nearly lost twice lol PvP Cheesed NaDa ...  Pretty much this. If he doesn't all-in Nada 3 times (despite the fact the 3rd failed and he won in the lategame) we probably have a fair MU. Inca is historically bad vs zerg and it is showing at the worst time. | ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:38 Crebstar wrote: GSL has yet to have a good finals Are you kidding me? Fruitdealer season 1 was incredible. Nestea vs MKP was crazy. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
| ||
|
Zooper31
United States5711 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:38 bbQ4Aiur wrote: anypro was saturated on 2 bases against july zerg on metalopolis when he was 6-7gating, and everybody was screaming cheese/all-in Because that actually is an all-in for protoss. 2 satuated bases for zerg is not. Especially when you continue to tech behind it. | ||
|
Dimagus
United States1004 Posts
| ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
Ouch, man. Just ... ouch. | ||
|
Malhorn
United States148 Posts
| ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
| ||
|
Maghetti
United States2429 Posts
LOL. I expected Inca to fall to code A sooner rather than later. Making it to the finals was a suprise, but I still stand by that he will fall to code A sooner rather than later. | ||
|
Ezekyle
Australia607 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:32 Kickboxer wrote: So what's Idra opinion on roach zergling these days?  On March 27 2011 05:18 IdrA wrote: zergs broken best chance to win is to play guessing games like everyone else dont read too much into it macro is still the proper way to play | ||
|
ChApFoU
France2983 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:36 Seide wrote: 2 DT rushes in a row isnt exactly trying to play macro games It's not a DT rush, it's a DT expand. The DTs are not there to kill your opponent right away but to secure your expansion (well at least they are supposed to :p). | ||
|
meep
United States1699 Posts
| ||
|
JesusOurSaviour
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On May 14 2011 16:37 LoLAdriankat wrote: Inca's play is so bad that you can't use this set as an indicator of balance. Your point about Crying is True. Your point about Inca being an indicator of Top-level Protoss play is false. Inca's voidray control vs TSL_Rain made me alt-F4 my GOM player thinking "Is this guy even a pro?" But yea Inca's standard P v T in terms of Zealot, Stalker, Colossus vs MMM bio ball + vikings, is quite good I have to admit. his P v P is unreal. his P v Z is probably weaker, but I'm sure not significantly weaker because NEstea is Unreal in general. | ||
|
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
| ||
