EPTNo reason to not have LAN.
[MLG] Dallas Day 3 - Page 413
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Stay on-topic please. Off-topic arguments derailing the thread will not be tolerated. Next spam post about eagles = ban. We get it, you're funny Take the eagle stuff here stop with the bw vs wc3 bullshit please | ||
|
branflakes14
2082 Posts
No reason to not have LAN. | ||
|
Corrik
United States1416 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:51 SiguR wrote: If you consider the hallucination loss last night as a win for idra, and this regame as a win for idra, He's 4-1 against huk right now at this MLG. Wrong. It'd be 4-0. Huk wouldn't have won game 3 if Idra hadn't quit that game since it would have been 2-0. | ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:52 CosmicSpiral wrote: A maxed out army without significant broodlord numbers. Way too many roaches against blink stalkers, immortals, sentries, and colossi. +6 infestors with full energy. The outcome is fuzzy to say the least. Yea, all Huk has to do is Hallucinated VRs and idra would rage quit, mlg should have given the game to huk | ||
|
Mucki
Germany2 Posts
| ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:53 Caphe wrote: Regame is the most logical decision. I find it funny how many people have no idea how PvZ work. More bases for Zerg in PvZ is nothing. A maxed 200 Protoss deadball will crush any Zerg army, Zerg can only fight late game Protoss with perfect tech switch and re-supply after initial 200 was wiped out. If you thing Idra had that game, you are so wrong. he had inferior upgrades, econ, bases and like 2 colossi against 6 infestors+5 more on the way. | ||
|
obiwong
Canada126 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/HWmaO.jpg) | ||
|
Malaz
Germany1257 Posts
| ||
|
PraetorianX
Sweden780 Posts
| ||
|
Derrida
2885 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:50 LoLAdriankat wrote: Day9 and DJWheat know how important LAN is, but it's unprofessional to be like "Blizzard you fucking suck, add lan you assholes." I do not ask them to flame Blizzard. Just stating that there is unrest within the community about this very issue would be sufficient. Not completely ignoring what community has to say about it. | ||
|
Mios
United States686 Posts
| ||
|
Geneq
Poland165 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:53 udgnim wrote: when people say LAN, they're talking about LAN for pro matches. it's too bad that if Blizzard does release a LAN version for pro leagues / tournaments that copy will be pirated eventually. LOL fail, without LAN it is still pirated, so what's the difference? also, everybody who wanted to pirate it already did. | ||
|
ZidaneTribal
United States2800 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:53 Reason.SC2 wrote: I believe IdrA wears earbud headphones. Also, they do not have announcer commentary audio where the players are because it was too easy to hear them even with headphones and sound on  i thought they did. when qxc was playing he could hear the commentators before the game started | ||
|
_vk_
219 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:53 crms wrote: yeah that's pretty terrible. has mlg released any sort of statement about why they are regame and not giving it to IdrA? IdrA had about as big of an advantage as someone can have without the game being over. IIRC their rules state disconnect = regame, no exceptions. | ||
|
corpsepose
1678 Posts
they have no other choice obviously but idra wouldve won that game with ease. | ||
|
Eufouria
United Kingdom4425 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:51 Mailing wrote: protoss can win with less bases, less supply, less upgrades, and less tech? That's where huk was that game. okay. Thats the story of almost every ZvP. The big protoss ball crushes the mostly roach army, the infesters make it interesting, but it was by no means won for either player. | ||
|
udgnim
United States8024 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:53 Inphinite wrote: LOL dude, IdrA had like 12 infestors and broods coming. He was 3 bases ahead of Huk as well. What did Huk have? 2 colossus? Sorry, ill just neural them, chain fungal like 5 times, throw down 30 infested terrans and the battle will be over in 12 seconds. show me a pro game where that has actually happened against a 200 supply Protoss otherwise, it's all theorycraft | ||
|
HeadDesk
United States171 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:53 Plansix wrote: What I don't understand is how MGL didn't think a stable internet connection was a good idea? Its not like the internet is a new, fickle thing that no one knows how to work with... lol.. you really think they didn't try to get one? That they were purposely sabotaging the players? Really.. don't blame MLG, it's Blizzard's fault for not allowing LAN, we all knew that this would be an issue when they first announced no LAN... | ||
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:53 Caphe wrote: Regame is the most logical decision. I find it funny how many people have no idea how PvZ work. More bases for Zerg in PvZ is nothing. A maxed 200 Protoss deadball will crush any Zerg army, Zerg can only fight late game Protoss with perfect tech switch and re-supply after initial 200 was wiped out. If you thing Idra had that game, you are so wrong. It's actually the only option according to the rules. If someone disconnects, regame. | ||
|
FLuE
United States1012 Posts
Series now going to be controversial no matter what happens and I hate that. I hate when we can't just talk about the games and instead end up talking about things like discs or lag. Just takes away from the excitement of a series. It is like bad reffing in a great sporting event that everyone talks about after the game instead of the game itself. | ||
|
xza
Singapore1600 Posts
On April 04 2011 04:52 CosmicSpiral wrote: A maxed out army without significant broodlord numbers. Way too many roaches against blink stalkers, immortals, sentries, and colossi. +6 infestors with full energy. The outcome is fuzzy to say the least. he had 2 colo, lesser upgrades, no stargate units and idra had a shitton of roaches, infestors with max energy, broodlords incoming, cracklings, mining out of 5 bases. definitely idra's game if they fought. | ||
| ||
