|
Stay on-topic please. Off-topic arguments derailing the thread will not be tolerated. Next spam post about eagles = ban. We get it, you're funnyTake the eagle stuff herestop with the bw vs wc3 bullshit please |
On April 04 2011 04:51 Tonic420 wrote:
Lan = Piracy of the game = Loss of money = Not going to happen
Casual players buy the game for single player and make up the bulk of the sales. Single player can already be pirated. The loyal players, who ladder on Blizzard servers, and the loyal fans, who just watch SC but won't use LAN, are being punished. It isn't even likely that a high percentage of the loyal playerbase would even use LAN as an alternative to ladder.
|
On April 04 2011 04:53 Caphe wrote:
Regame is the most logical decision. I find it funny how many people have no idea how PvZ work. More bases for Zerg in PvZ is nothing.
A maxed 200 Protoss deadball will crush any Zerg army, Zerg can only fight late game Protoss with perfect tech switch and re-supply after initial 200 was wiped out. If you thing Idra had that game, you are so wrong.
what deathball? two colossus i udnerstand if it was vr colosssus army. you probably dont play enough starcraft to know.
|
On April 04 2011 04:53 tnud wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2011 04:51 Tonic420 wrote:
Lan = Piracy of the game = Loss of money = Not going to happen Lan after you log on to battle.net = no loss of money = happy fans = still not going to happen
Doesn't make sense since LAN should be no internet required otherwise you can't host it anywhere without internet. A better alternative is a blizzard lan team that brings servers to tournaments so it's LAN but not releasing server/clients publicly.
|
|
|
On April 04 2011 04:53 VirGin wrote:
lol cant believe people are saying award idra the win >_>
Not too surprising. It's not like emotions are at an ebb after a DC; were I an IdrA fan I'd be angry too. Still not confident enough in my prognositcating to say that IdrA had a surefire win.
|
god thats disappointing, idra has this
|
On April 04 2011 04:53 Inphinite wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2011 04:52 city42 wrote:On April 04 2011 04:50 CrispyTender wrote:On April 04 2011 04:48 00Visor wrote:On April 04 2011 04:47 sjschmidt93 wrote:
IdrA - up 2 bases (3 kind of) and 23 supply with 3k banked. Brood lords on the way, Many infestors probably maxed or close to on energy.
You can't say he's not in the lead. No. But you can't say the game is won. So rematch. you can easily say the game was won. without stargate units in his army the infestor/roach would melt his stalkers in 8 seconds Idra's army would have been absolutely crushed. Whether he could have won the game after that is a different matter, but his maxed army was vastly inferior to huk's. LOL dude, IdrA had like 12 infestors and broods coming. He was 3 bases ahead of Huk as well. What did Huk have? 2 colossus? Sorry, ill just neural them, chain fungal like 5 times, throw down 30 infested terrans and the battle will be over in 12 seconds.
1) He did NOT have broods coming. He was maxed. In order to get broods, he'd have to lose units, build corruptors, and make them into broods. The first engagement would not involve broodlords. Stop making stuff up.
2) Roach infestor does not beat stalker sentry immortal.
|
Fighter, your ignorance is amazing. This is a tournament for money... Huk was re-expanding to his MAIN BASE that has NO MINERALS(Very few). Idra was making spine crawlers and increasing his army size while getting more defense.
5 base vs 2 and incredible upgrades. Huk has 0 air units.. I mean really do I need to keep breaking this down? It's possible Huk might of pulled off a very gosu win/moves but there was at least 80% chance Idra won and you want to take it away from him.
I honestly don't get it
|
I would settle for just being able to save the gamestate on a crash.
I REEEALLY wanted to see that infester action play out.
|
On April 04 2011 04:51 Mailing wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2011 04:50 SKtheAnathema wrote:On April 04 2011 04:49 adx2infinitum wrote:
IdrA deserved that win... sucks so much for him. why? because zerg can make more bases? i think we can agree zerg is imba then >_> protoss can win with less bases, less supply, less upgrades, and less tech? That's where huk was that game. okay.
Lol idra maxed on mostly roaches, and huk had blink tech, colo tech, stargate tech.
Cant tell if all these zergs posting are srs.
|
The worst part about this is the fact that Huk knows not to do that terrible stargate opening.
|
On April 04 2011 04:54 corpsepose wrote:
this regame is a complete travesty
they have no other choice obviously but idra wouldve won that game with ease.
It's true. They could've been nice to IdrA and eliminate the extended series though :D
|
|
|
Huk why are you trying to out-macro Idra again... c'mon man.
|
On April 04 2011 04:54 branflakes14 wrote:
Piracy of the game = People not thinking the game is worth the money
No reason to not have LAN.
Yeah, good people buy good games. Treat your costumers like they pay the bills.
|
On April 04 2011 04:53 VirGin wrote:
lol cant believe people are saying award idra the win >_> 12 infestors with enough for 2 or 1 fungals on all of them.
Max upgrades
6 bases.
saving up minerals
HuK mining from 2 bases.
idk man
|
|
|
On April 04 2011 04:54 obiwong wrote:don't worry guys, it's not battle.net. i hear it's a pretty common problem with these MLG computers ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/HWmaO.jpg)
obviously alienware is windows 95
|
On April 04 2011 04:54 garett wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2011 04:53 udgnim wrote:On April 04 2011 04:51 Tonic420 wrote:
Lan = Piracy of the game = Loss of money = Not going to happen when people say LAN, they're talking about LAN for pro matches. it's too bad that if Blizzard does release a LAN version for pro leagues / tournaments that copy will be pirated eventually. LOL fail, without LAN it is still pirated, so what's the difference? also, everybody who wanted to pirate it already did.
single player is pirated, they can't play multiplayer which is the big thing
with LAN, multiplayer will also be pirated
|
On April 04 2011 04:55 tnud wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2011 04:53 Caphe wrote:
Regame is the most logical decision. I find it funny how many people have no idea how PvZ work. More bases for Zerg in PvZ is nothing.
A maxed 200 Protoss deadball will crush any Zerg army, Zerg can only fight late game Protoss with perfect tech switch and re-supply after initial 200 was wiped out. If you thing Idra had that game, you are so wrong. It's actually the only option according to the rules. If someone disconnects, regame.
well, they didnt care about the rules when huk taunted idra in their last series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
