[TSL] Ro32 Day2 - Page 234
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Upset about the results? Want to vent your rage? Use this instead | ||
|
brentsen
1252 Posts
| ||
|
darklordjac
Canada2231 Posts
| ||
|
Centric
United States1989 Posts
| ||
|
nvs.
Canada3609 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:50 Nuttyguy wrote: lol people bitching 200/200 battles are boring and all ins are boring what do you want? QFT people are so hard to please. ![]() | ||
|
Condor Hero
United States2931 Posts
okay fruitdealer had about 3-4 different options after scouting thorzains build that wouldve just killed him and he picked the absolute worst option | ||
|
Stuv
Netherlands942 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:49 Elefanto wrote: why are sc2 players so fucking greedy trying to milk every little profit they can get -_- Is exactly same in SCBW. | ||
|
Combine
United States812 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:50 Heaton31 wrote: Agreed. We need a no attack for 15 mins right? Heh. Just because there isn't cheese doesn't mean there isn't going to be attacking. Macro games have a ton of back and forth in the early game as well. | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:49 Mackh wrote: Too much cheese is killing that tournament... Nonsense. There are been very few all-ins, and this kind of exciting plays from time to time are really good for the tournament. | ||
|
Karthane
United States1183 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:50 Vandal wrote: If Jinro loses my bracket is in trouble... I have him getting to the finals. Something tells me your bracket is in trouble even if he wins :p | ||
|
Eeevil
Netherlands359 Posts
| ||
|
calvinL
Canada416 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:49 UltraVires wrote: Jinro should have pulled 10 scvs to repair racks wall instead of lifting off QQ Are you serious? He would've lost all his rax to banelings, by lifting them he saved them. His build was just too greedy and he got punished for it. | ||
|
ttomelle
Sweden243 Posts
| ||
|
FairDestroyer
United States50 Posts
more viewers than Al Gore's channel, Current TV | ||
|
Archvil3
Denmark989 Posts
Jinro took a chance, the odds for success is actually pretty good but Morrow totaly busted that. No imba, no cheese, just perfect reaction to a risky build. | ||
|
samaNo4
Spain245 Posts
| ||
|
relyt
United States1073 Posts
| ||
|
ffdestiny
United States773 Posts
Even if the Z loses all their zerglings/banelings, they will still manage to destroy a couple barracks/scvs/marines in the process and can back that up with a larvae-inject round of zerglings. As a T, you have to sit on your first base until you get enough to defend the second, because of the map's large area. | ||
|
Gentso
United States2218 Posts
| ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:50 Heaton31 wrote: Agreed. We need a no attack for 15 mins right? Heh. There are more options besides all-in and turtling -_- why post such a thing | ||
|
Necosarius
Sweden4042 Posts
On March 21 2011 05:50 Stress wrote: This. On the other hand, I was kinda surprised that Jinro tried opening CC first, a bit too risky. Nope, Morrow is known for his macro style, CC first was a good choice. Morrows response was just better. | ||
| ||
