On March 20 2011 05:30 FreedonNadd wrote: Guys what was that? The game wasn't even close.....
If FD committed to a roach bust after he saw the double expand he would've won easily IMO. a couple more roaches and the bunker wouldn't have been enough to hold him off.
On March 20 2011 05:29 Weasel- wrote: I hope the whole "yeah I've seen one of boxer's games" thing was some sort of sarcasm we didn't get cause we're not Romanian.
Probably, at least I hope so. I mean, in his interview, he sounded like he was dissing Boxer : /
Very impressed by Thorzain, I knew he was a good player, but never knew how good he really was. There was nothing goofy about his play, played really crisp and defended FD's counter attacks extremely well. Reminds me of Jinro.
Does anyone else think that the games by Fruitdealer were so underwhelming that I just have to assume he was having some latency issues? But all in all he was pretty much outplayed and Thorzain pretty much would have been 2-0 anyway with play like that (although I really think there was definitely something wrong with Fruitdealer today)
On March 20 2011 05:23 DeckOneBell wrote: Fruitdealer loses two games by reacting badly to non-standard openings. That's too bad. Thorzain earned his wins, though.
Ahhhhhhh, so sad.
The first game wasn't standard? I mean he basically did what TSL aLive did in the GSL code A vs Cezanne. 2 rax FE into 2 factory hellion MM. The 2 rax is about as standard as you can get. Thorzain just outplayed him completely, with the other build being greedy and overall well played.
On March 20 2011 05:30 imbs wrote: lets be objective here. did thorzain play well? yes. did fd play bad? yes. was it amazing strategy? no, it was a standard ultra careful tank/marine push, standard in about a million rts games.