Up/Down Match Groups GSL S5 - Page 6
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
| ||
krazymunky
United States727 Posts
im hoping boxer is able to stay in code S. his recent play hasnt been that great | ||
kiy0
Portugal593 Posts
| ||
Daniel C
Hong Kong1606 Posts
On March 12 2011 00:38 kiy0 wrote: Imagine if Leenock manages to beat Nestea... :D Then we'll get an inglorious repeat of the GSL2 finals. | ||
Jetaap
France4814 Posts
| ||
TR
2320 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
Beyonder
![]()
Netherlands15103 Posts
But, now Huk and MC can practice PvP together! ![]() | ||
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
On March 11 2011 23:47 rysecake wrote: This lol. Alot of people think lowly of Mvp now for dropping 2 games. He still has THE best win/loss record in GSL (at least i think he does). It's the fact that he is playing vs protoss, not that people don't rate him. | ||
crfty
United States174 Posts
They all clearly deserve to be in Code S, just pass that whole group through. D: | ||
dunc
Netherlands1105 Posts
On March 12 2011 00:26 Daniel C wrote: Thanks, but then why is MKP "4th" but Inca "3rd" even though they both went 1-2? MKP lost to Inca, making him fourth of their group! edit: someone beat me to it | ||
machination
United States175 Posts
A: Choya B: Leenock C: Virus D: Zenio E: Genius F: Rain G: TheBest H: BanBans | ||
EnderCraft
United States1746 Posts
| ||
shannn
Netherlands2891 Posts
On March 12 2011 01:15 EnderCraft wrote: Man such horrible picks for some of the top code A people : / What were they thinking... You think SuperNova and Losira picked the wrong people? I'm amazed you think that or you are misunderstanding that every code A player picks their players in their up and down matches. | ||
p1cKLes
United States342 Posts
| ||
Geisterkarle
Germany3257 Posts
| ||
![]()
Antoine
United States7481 Posts
Group A ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Huk/Inca loser < Terminus RE > ![]() Huk/Inca loser < Scrap Station > ![]() Huk/Inca loser < Xel'Naga Caverns > ![]() Group B ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Leenock/Nestea loser < Tal'Darim Altar > ![]() Leenock/Nestea loser < Xel'Naga Caverns > ![]() Leenock/Nestea loser < Scrap Station > ![]() Group C ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Virus/FruitDealer loser< Terminus RE > ![]() Virus/FruitDealer loser< Scrap Station > ![]() Virus/FruitDealer loser< Metalopolis > ![]() Group D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SangHo/Zenio loser < Terminus RE > ![]() SangHo/Zenio loser < Shakuras Plateau > ![]() SangHo/Zenio loser < Xel'Naga Caverns > ![]() Group E ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Alicia/MVP loser < Tal'Darim Altar > ![]() Alicia/MVP loser < Shakuras Plateau > ![]() Alicia/MVP loser < Xel'Naga Caverns > ![]() Group F ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Rain/TOP loser < Terminus RE > ![]() Rain/TOP loser < Shakuras Plateau > ![]() Rain/TOP loser < Crossfire SE > ![]() Group G ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SuperNova/Polt loser < Scrap Station > ![]() SuperNova/Polt loser < Shakuras Plateau > ![]() SuperNova/Polt loser < Crevasse > ![]() Group H ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Losira/Banbanssu loser < Metalopolis > ![]() Losira/Banbanssu loser < Shakuras Plateau > ![]() Losira/Banbanssu loser < Tal'Darim Altar > ![]() | ||
JustQuitWarcraftIII
United States679 Posts
| ||
Blueblister
Sweden321 Posts
On March 11 2011 22:07 Markwerf wrote: This is so retarded. MKP, leenock and nestea in one group while an other group is supernova, polt & the best. GSL tournament setup atm is just completely retarded. There should definately be some more seeding to avoid random knockouts of good players. It is already stupid that both finalists of the previous GSL have to play up and down matches, who should play up and down from the code S players should really be determined by results in the previous two GSL's or even three. Ie. If you reach final your safe for the next 2 GSL's. Even then if that is not used there should at least be a seeded placement for the up and down groups. Nestea and MKP, the 2 players with the best overall GSL results, in the same group? That is just retarded, the chance of one of them getting knocked out is fairly decent now as Leenock is quite a fine player who nearly beat MKP in previous GSLs already. They should have just paired the best GSL players from code S to the worst in the up down matches, ie MVP with Polt, MKP with Hyperdub or something like that. Say whaaat??? Do you even follow the GSL and its seedings? Nestea and MKP preformed badly and have no one but themselves to blame. MvP had a pretty tough group, but because of the seedings. He still lost to a Code A Ro8 player! If any conclusions can be drawn from the current GSL (where 6 of the top 8 is from Up & Down matches), then it is that past achievements is greatly overrated in terms of future performance. This game is too young to have "bonjwas". Up and coming players are already have a very hard time getting into the top tourneys because of the many invite slots to each event. Please don't encourage more MLG-like structures. It's hardly possible to have more seeding than GSL already do. Stronger seedings fore Code S players would only be given because of sentimental attachment, not skill. If you are a good enough player, you should be able to qualify for a tournament by your on strength. | ||
Reasonable
Ukraine1432 Posts
| ||
sjschmidt93
United States2518 Posts
There's so many good Code S players in the up/downs this season (MKP, NesTea, MVP, Genius, FD, Rainbow, Choya) that I don't see many Code A'ers getting out. | ||
| ||