[GSL March] Code S Ro32 Day 3 - Page 70
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
dltkdgn89
Korea (South)2 Posts
| ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
| ||
Babaganoush
United States626 Posts
| ||
Kurr
Canada2338 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:19 GTR wrote: shakuras played thrice? why don't they just assign a single map to each set like any normal tournament would do. Agreed. Variety is the most important thing and the GSL seems to use the same 2-3 maps over and over... I'd rather watch any other map right now. Even Desert Oasis :D. | ||
Mise
Finland580 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:21 Defacer wrote: Ensnare has already proved that he is a good player. He has been one of the best Terrans since beta.god, i'm disappointed. Hopefully ensnare and san aren't one hit wonders. | ||
EMPaThy789
New Zealand878 Posts
| ||
BrahCJ
Australia659 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:21 dltkdgn89 wrote: i'm sad to see slayers boxer go down so helplessly.... if anybody has trouble with gomtv - HQ stream @imafag Inc ban. | ||
ngri
Luxembourg136 Posts
| ||
Vorlik
1522 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:21 Defacer wrote: god, i'm disappointed. Hopefully ensnare and san aren't one hit wonders. Ensnare has always been good o.O | ||
Avalain
Canada308 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:16 iEchoic wrote: I really don't think Nestea saw that coming, I think he saw the bunker and assumed expo so he made roaches to bust it and just got lucky. I don't think he made the roaches until after seeing the rush from the xelnaga tower. But I guess it's possible. I didn't start watching until just before the rush. Here I was thinking "oh wow, Nestea is so good! He's totally going to win this and go on to semis at least". Then I checked out the earlier results. Wow. | ||
Teratos
United States12 Posts
| ||
rolfe
United Kingdom1266 Posts
| ||
Azza
China650 Posts
| ||
cocoa_sg
Singapore296 Posts
| ||
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:20 ratMortar wrote: Ditto, Boxer had that all-in perfectly thought out. Nestea is just the perfect anti-cheese zerg. Reminded me of his first game against Choya from last season. Agreed. Against any other Zerg, BoxeR's rush would've worked quite well. However, Nestea seemed absolutely cheese-proof in that game through either superior thinking with a touch of luck. I respect BoxeR's all-in. It was definitely the most intelligent, professional all-in that I've ever seen, which is literally a paradox. Quite well thought-out to maximize mind-games and minimize scouting effectiveness. Heck, it's quite hard to execute even though it's an all-in. | ||
iEchoic
United States1776 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:19 Cel.erity wrote: Are you sure about that? I think the timing of a 2rax expand would have been slightly earlier than that push, even if he builds the orbital in his main. I really think Nestea's danger sense started tingling when he saw no orbital landing at the proper time. These guys know the timings down to the second. That was way too fast to land an orbital if you built it in-base. On February 26 2011 16:20 Vezex wrote: no, he made the roaches after he saw the marines coming FE into blue flame is super common and roaches are a way of dealing with that, maybe he clicked on the gas and saw that boxer wasn't mining it hince why he pooled larva, but i don't think luck had anything to do with it Dunno, I'm pretty sure I remember seeing the roaches in production before he saw the units, assuming the ling didn't see them (tastosis said it didn't). Guess we'll have to wait for the vod. Tastosis could have been wrong as well. | ||
Platori
Finland6 Posts
| ||
Fighter
Korea (South)1531 Posts
NesTea and Boxer down to the up and down matches... I expected Boxer to lose, but man, BOTH of these guys losing is just so, so disapointing. I'm actually kinda sad about GSL so far. Squirtle lost, MVP is out, IdrA's gone, Haypro and Moonglade lost, Rain WON. Then Nestea and Boxer... At least Huk, Jinro and July have done well. | ||
Onlinejaguar
Australia2823 Posts
| ||
teamsolid
Canada3668 Posts
I'm so sad for Boxer too, especially after he got sponsored by Razer. ![]() | ||
| ||