EPT[GSL March] Code S Ro32 Day 3 - Page 69
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
onmach
United States1241 Posts
| ||
|
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:16 iEchoic wrote: I really don't think Nestea saw that coming, I think he saw the bunker and assumed expo so he made roaches to bust it and just got lucky. Are you sure about that? I think the timing of a 2rax expand would have been slightly earlier than that push, even if he builds the orbital in his main. I really think Nestea's danger sense started tingling when he saw no orbital landing at the proper time. These guys know the timings down to the second. | ||
|
xza
Singapore1600 Posts
| ||
|
dukethegold
Canada5645 Posts
Making 8 roaches at once makes me think NesTea was prepared to do an aggression build that just happened to counter the all in. | ||
|
PartyBiscuit
Canada4525 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:19 WingEn wrote: I don't see what's wrong with all-ins? It's considered a strategy as well isn't it? Besides, Boxer did so many tricks to try and fool NesTea before he went all-in. plus it's not like Boxer is not known for doing cheese...he loves that stuff and he's usually good at it, just not against Nestea. | ||
|
UruzuNine
Canada162 Posts
| ||
|
Vitamins
United States680 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:14 Maskedsatyr wrote: This isn't your 2 rax all-in that u see bitbybit do, like artosis said boxer did everything possible to trick to nestea. Yes, I get that, but it doesn't nullify the fact that it was an all-in. Doing everything you can to convince your opponent otherwise of what you're doing doesn't make it any different than not doing so. I personally don't care whether someone all-ins or not. If I was playing for that amount of money, I'd do whatever it took to win. I'm just pointing out the stupid fact that Artosis chose to defend it simply because it was Boxer playing. If BitByBit played just like that, we all know he would have mocked him for it. | ||
|
Deleted User 109835
629 Posts
| ||
|
lbmaian
United States689 Posts
| ||
|
Clare
United States372 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:15 eviltomahawk wrote: Move over, Tester, because SlayerS_BoxeR is the true Trickster. Uh, but his tricky build failed. I'm scared for him in the up/down matches now. His TvZ is so weak, and I fear for his survivability against the many talented Zergs duking it out in the Code A tournament. BoxeR behind now, but luckily, he is no BitByBit and is now transitioning into Factory tech. He is on the edge of death. Nestea is too smart for tricks and all-ins. Is he all-in proof? It's certainly looking like it now. There might be 2 Zergs into the Ro8 of Code A. He's very unlikely to hit a TvZ in the Up & Down. | ||
|
pirates
United States701 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:17 spidii wrote: BoxeR has yet to impress me honestly, he's okay but...not great, I wonder if Intel is a little regretful lol No, not at all. Boxer is the best player to sponsor in the world. Him winning is irrelevant to being a good marketing tool. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
Sad day for both players, though. Nestea needs to work on playing against the type of play displayed by Ensnare and San. BoxeR needs to REALLY improve his TvZ. Oh well. Time to see the two upset-makers duke it out to see who is the ultimate champion cockblock. It should an AMAZING game on Tal'Darim. | ||
|
ratMortar
Canada282 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:18 wolfe wrote: You get the f&ck out. ;D This wasn't a bitbybit all in. Nestea is just that good. Ditto, Boxer had that all-in perfectly thought out. Nestea is just the perfect anti-cheese zerg. Reminded me of his first game against Choya from last season. | ||
|
Onlinejaguar
Australia2823 Posts
| ||
|
sawedust
United States506 Posts
Having him go 3-0 is going to make everyone re-think their opinions about him, if his performance in beating BoxeR and Nestea hasn't already done so. | ||
|
SniXSniPe
United States1938 Posts
| ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
| ||
|
Cypress131
8 Posts
| ||
|
Lobo2me
Norway1213 Posts
On February 26 2011 16:19 xza wrote: baller post hardcore music, TITLE?!? http://www.gomtv.net/2011gslsponsors2/forum/61604 | ||
| ||
