EPTOn February 22 2011 20:37 SushilS wrote:
Didnt Tony Hawk do a 900?
Didnt Tony Hawk do a 900?
Yeah thats his trademark
[GSL March] Code S Ro32 Day 1 - Page 97
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Please remember that these threads are for talking about the games. People who cannot watch rely on these threads for information. If the thread is diluted with balance/caster/lack of snacks whine, it makes it useless for those who want to read it. Thanks a lot! | ||
|
Nesquik
United Kingdom600 Posts
Yeah thats his trademark | ||
|
Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo
Germany2959 Posts
| ||
|
papyrus
Philippines716 Posts
On February 22 2011 20:37 PuercoPop wrote: Man, he should blow up the tech lab with banelings to prevent upgrades.. there is a siege tank, so its no. | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38255 Posts
 Interesting start to the game, Zenio's got some good creep spread going. | ||
|
kazansky
Germany931 Posts
| ||
|
Babaganoush
United States626 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i56.tinypic.com/2pt1995.jpg) | ||
|
Nich
397 Posts
| ||
|
Bactrian
Australia176 Posts
On February 22 2011 20:26 kodas wrote: Yea because you can't still come back and win after your all in does damage DERP ?? I think we have different definitions then. For me if you all in and you don't kill them right then, you've lost. Like in MC vs Hyperdub, Dub was almost mined out, if his attack failed there was no way for him to come back. Similarly if T pulls all his SCVs, if you fail that attack you've lost all workers, there's no way to come back from that. Just like 4-gate isn't all in, its cheesy, but you can expand after, whereas you can't with 5 gate, which is all in if you ask me. But just like if you pull 5 SCVs instead of all of them, that's not all in - it's sacrificing economy for aggression. Just like Artosis called it "mid econ baneling aggression" in the first game. You still have some econ behind it. You can just change your zergling cycles for drone cycles. Basically I disagree with you because I think ALL IN means you are wagering EVERYTHING on the attack, how it is in poker. Like how you wager all your econ with 5gate or all you workers with the scv pull. You still have a reasonable worker count and an expansion behind the baneling aggression. And don't forget - a baneling bust is guaranteed to do some damage to Terran. You will break the wall unless its a 2 rax wall and you will get speedlings inside the base (Did you notice July scouted how MVP had walled before morphing banes?). You're just betting that you can do more damage than it costs you. Just like if you do a blue flame hellion drop, you're counting on it doing damage, and it will certainly do SOME sort of damage, but it's not all in. PS. A derp to you too! | ||
|
T0fuuu
Australia2275 Posts
| ||
|
RagsSC
20 Posts
| ||
|
zerious
Canada3803 Posts
| ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38255 Posts
| ||
|
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
| ||
|
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
| ||
|
Gao Xi
Hong Kong5178 Posts
| ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
| ||
|
SushilS
2115 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
| ||
| ||
