EPTChrome isn't nearly as memory consuming as firefox. And it's much faster imo. I've been using firefox for the past couple years and recently switched to chrome. The difference is pretty substantial.
MLG DC Day 1 - Page 18
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
KonohaFlash
Canada1590 Posts
Chrome isn't nearly as memory consuming as firefox. And it's much faster imo. I've been using firefox for the past couple years and recently switched to chrome. The difference is pretty substantial. | ||
|
Fogul
United Kingdom179 Posts
| ||
|
dcemuser
United States3248 Posts
It should be on any minute now. | ||
|
shredzy
Australia119 Posts
On October 16 2010 06:42 Ohdamn wrote: does someone know how much the MLG HD thing costs? i can't find a price anywhere on there site Oo $10 | ||
|
lightrise
United States1355 Posts
 o well. firefox is being a bitch | ||
|
kammeyer
United States275 Posts
On October 16 2010 06:42 HeIios wrote: For some reason Firefox keeps on crashing and hogging quite a bit of my resources, chrome was the only sane alternative. I can't see anything on the stream, just blackness. Is this normal?  Ah =p No idea. Mine says stream is not available, currently. Yet it was about 5 minutes ago, ;P | ||
|
Jaal
United States61 Posts
The lag is from refreshing a bunch with octoshape.. check your running processes I disabled No Script and I finally got it to work with FF. However, things came to a crawl and when I opened up task manager, I noticed 2 OctoshapeClient.exe running. (Windows 7) I'll just use Chrome per usual. | ||
|
AmiPolizeiFunk
Germany804 Posts
| ||
|
Tiaan
United States35 Posts
| ||
|
Onlinejaguar
Australia2823 Posts
| ||
|
Mabius
Canada323 Posts
| ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
On October 16 2010 06:42 Ohdamn wrote: does someone know how much the MLG HD thing costs? i can't find a price anywhere on there site Oo 10$ | ||
|
Stacykim
Canada21 Posts
Firefox is a resource hog. they handle multiple tabs completely differently. chrome is better for multitaskers. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On October 16 2010 06:42 KonohaFlash wrote: Chrome isn't nearly as memory consuming as firefox. And it's much faster imo. I've been using firefox for the past couple years and recently switched to chrome. The difference is pretty substantial. It actually consumes more memory if you use a lot of windows/tabs since it uses a multi-process architecture. For the same reason it can be more processor heavy. | ||
|
kammeyer
United States275 Posts
I love Day9 & JP together as commentators. So damn hilarious. | ||
|
Darksoldierr
Hungary2013 Posts
| ||
|
JQL
United States214 Posts
| ||
|
delo
United States333 Posts
| ||
|
Teebagger
United States38 Posts
| ||
|
crfty
United States174 Posts
| ||
| ||
