|
On September 27 2010 19:45 Viruuus wrote:
The problem is that when one race has a large advantage over another, any win there is will not be FULLY credited to the winner. Nobody claims ITR sucks in fact i think most ppl agree he play very well. But check is a great player too and of course everyone will wonder how a "fair" game would have went.
..but lets not discuss balance here too much...
He played ok, his execution was quite clean, but the point people are making is that he just raped one of the best zergs in the world with clean, but unremarkable, execution of simple openings.
don't really want a balance conversation, but just saying.
|
Terran outplayed protoss in every way that match =|
|
Ok that's just bad play - poor micro straight up.
|
Aww. He didn't get to use the nuke.
|
Terran Harass kills zerg.
Zerg ALL inns kills maby a supply depot or a rax.
Wall off should be vournable to something early. Replace roach with hydra den, and balance hydra around being t1,5..........
|
On September 27 2010 19:47 Piy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 19:45 Viruuus wrote:
The problem is that when one race has a large advantage over another, any win there is will not be FULLY credited to the winner. Nobody claims ITR sucks in fact i think most ppl agree he play very well. But check is a great player too and of course everyone will wonder how a "fair" game would have went.
..but lets not discuss balance here too much... He played ok, his execution was quite clean, but the point people are making is that he just raped one of the best zergs in the world with clean, but unremarkable, execution of simple openings. don't really want a balance conversation, but just saying.
In this case Check really played bad.
|
Wow!
Ensnare looking so solid again.
He's not up against someone really good or he is too good himself?
|
Totally outplayed, but with those two extra Colossi he could have won at least the fight
On September 27 2010 19:49 amorpheus wrote:
Wow!
Ensnare looking so solid again.
He's not up against someone really good or he is too good himself?
Anyone is good o.o
|
On September 27 2010 19:48 Dionyseus wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 19:47 Piy wrote:On September 27 2010 19:45 Viruuus wrote:
The problem is that when one race has a large advantage over another, any win there is will not be FULLY credited to the winner. Nobody claims ITR sucks in fact i think most ppl agree he play very well. But check is a great player too and of course everyone will wonder how a "fair" game would have went.
..but lets not discuss balance here too much... He played ok, his execution was quite clean, but the point people are making is that he just raped one of the best zergs in the world with clean, but unremarkable, execution of simple openings. don't really want a balance conversation, but just saying. In this case Check really played bad.
In G2, but in G1 his play wasn't awful, and Rainbow didn't do anything special in either.
Ensnare so good last game
|
anypro had to fight out of a horrible, horrible position in the last battle....did you see all these zealots having to run up the ramp and around the forcefields? not good...
also letting ensnare take the gold without an attempt to break the expo before it could become a PF: not good
EDIT:@Naruto: I honestly think that anypro would've dominated the battle if the position hadn't been so awful; ensnare didn't have "that" many vikings, the colossi would've killed really much if they had been able to fire at the whole ball
|
protoss was behind the whole game.
|
Heres hoping game 2 is actually fun to watch.
|
On September 27 2010 19:48 Pekkz wrote:
Terran Harass kills zerg.
Zerg ALL inns kills maby a supply depot or a rax.
Wall off should be vournable to something early. Replace roach with hydra den, and balance hydra around being t1,5..........
srsly stop posting
|
with 5 colossus that would've been a massacre of MMM with storm to follow up not sure why people make it look like toss was outplayed the whole game.
He did great job considering how much pressure was put on him
|
Patch 1.1 never played a match with this one and it seems i was right because it didn't change anything....well the only thing thats new to me are those cute icons xD
|
toss woulda been fine with those 2 colossi X_X
|
On September 27 2010 19:49 sleepingdog wrote:
anypro had to fight out of a horrible, horrible position in the last battle....did you see all these zealots having to run up the ramp and around the forcefields? not good...
also letting ensnare take the gold without an attempt to break the expo before it could become a PF: not good
He let TWO colossi be intercepted by a marauder ball and do 0 damage.
The battle was quite even, but terran was able to remake his army out of 10 barracks in seconds.
Two colossi would of made a big difference :|
|
I love how Artosis keeps saying that the Marauder is a really good unit, and he is so right. I don't understand it when Terran players don't make Marauders.
|
On September 27 2010 19:49 Piy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 19:48 Dionyseus wrote:On September 27 2010 19:47 Piy wrote:On September 27 2010 19:45 Viruuus wrote:
The problem is that when one race has a large advantage over another, any win there is will not be FULLY credited to the winner. Nobody claims ITR sucks in fact i think most ppl agree he play very well. But check is a great player too and of course everyone will wonder how a "fair" game would have went.
..but lets not discuss balance here too much... He played ok, his execution was quite clean, but the point people are making is that he just raped one of the best zergs in the world with clean, but unremarkable, execution of simple openings. don't really want a balance conversation, but just saying. In this case Check really played bad. In G2, but in G1 his play wasn't awful, and Rainbow didn't do anything special in either. Ensnare so good last game
In G1 he lost his main deterrent (the infestors) before the mass ultras could show up, he was literally 1 minute from 5-6 ultras instead of losing them in 1s and 2s, he can't marine push into 3 infestors with fungal growth. In game two, newsflash, check played shit.
|
On September 27 2010 19:47 Piy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 19:45 Viruuus wrote:
The problem is that when one race has a large advantage over another, any win there is will not be FULLY credited to the winner. Nobody claims ITR sucks in fact i think most ppl agree he play very well. But check is a great player too and of course everyone will wonder how a "fair" game would have went.
..but lets not discuss balance here too much... He played ok, his execution was quite clean, but the point people are making is that he just raped one of the best zergs in the world with clean, but unremarkable, execution of simple openings. don't really want a balance conversation, but just saying.
Check made some pretty big blunders though. And hasn't check already raped good terran players in this same tournament?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
