EPT[IEM] Gamescom Day 4 + TLO vs NaDa! - Page 90
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Faranth
933 Posts
| ||
|
leveller
Sweden1840 Posts
| ||
|
[DUF]MethodMan
Germany1716 Posts
| ||
|
Exil
Poland88 Posts
 | ||
GTR
51583 Posts
nvm avek slowly crawling back | ||
|
Tiax;mous
669 Posts
On August 21 2010 21:05 Kexx wrote: I wouldn't bet on finding them. Chances are Kespa will forbid ESL to release the vods. Your best hope will be somebody that recorded the stream. i highly doubt kespa has power to forbid esl releasing vod's as vods belong to esl and replays belong to blizz. but esl may not release vods just not to cause any more problems to Nada | ||
|
I_Love_Bacon
United States5765 Posts
On August 21 2010 21:05 Kexx wrote: I wouldn't bet on finding them. Chances are Kespa will forbid ESL to release the vods. Your best hope will be somebody that recorded the stream. Kespa has no jurisdiction to tell esl what to do. They have no leverage over them either unless they have a deal in the works (no idea what it'd be or why) that they didn't want to spoil. | ||
|
Brad
2754 Posts
On August 21 2010 21:07 leveller wrote: Damn I missed the Civ demo, giant death robot? + Spearmen, helicopters, tanks, spaceships, nukes and country leaders from thousands of years ago. | ||
|
[DUF]MethodMan
Germany1716 Posts
| ||
|
Faranth
933 Posts
| ||
|
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
It was mostly IEM's internet, not b.net. Shortly before the TLO vs nada showmatch their internet died entirely and they couldnt do the quake live games either. Also, the quake live games were getting some lag as well. It really wasnt blizzard's fault for anything that happened. Not saying LAN wouldnt be nice, but to say that b.net failed here is just wrong. About KeSPA situation Why were they so against the showmatch being streamed in korea that they would force NaDa to GG halfway through the game once they discovered a korean stream of the games? Maybe they are afraid that SC2 will actually become popular in korea resulting in their loss of BW players (and so a loss in income)? | ||
|
Devolved
United States2753 Posts
| ||
|
keV.
United States3214 Posts
On August 21 2010 21:13 Devolved wrote: How much more Quake? Last semi coming up. | ||
|
GTR
51583 Posts
| ||
|
some_noob
160 Posts
I love watching it tho | ||
|
Ghazwan
Netherlands444 Posts
On August 21 2010 21:12 TheRabidDeer wrote: To people saying b.net failed: It was mostly IEM's internet, not b.net. Shortly before the TLO vs nada showmatch their internet died entirely and they couldnt do the quake live games either. Also, the quake live games were getting some lag as well. It really wasnt blizzard's fault for anything that happened. Not saying LAN wouldnt be nice, but to say that b.net failed here is just wrong. No, that's still Blizz failing with no LAN support, making the tourney dependent on the net connection of the host. | ||
|
Kandryn
30 Posts
| ||
|
Lukeeze[zR]
Switzerland6838 Posts
On August 21 2010 21:13 GTR wrote: omg cooller vs rapha iem s4 finals rematch D= and quakecon rematch from 1 week ago | ||
|
Jameser
Sweden951 Posts
On August 21 2010 21:12 TheRabidDeer wrote: To people saying b.net failed: It was mostly IEM's internet, not b.net. Shortly before the TLO vs nada showmatch their internet died entirely and they couldnt do the quake live games either. Also, the quake live games were getting some lag as well. It really wasnt blizzard's fault for anything that happened. Not saying LAN wouldnt be nice, but to say that b.net failed here is just wrong. it would not even be an issue if there was LAN, this is the point people are making and it's a valid point why would you connect to a server far away when you are playing someone right next to you? | ||
|
GTR
51583 Posts
its like the flash-jaedong of quake -_- | ||
| ||
