data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
[IEM] Gamescom Day 3 - Page 93
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Boonesbane
United States170 Posts
![]() | ||
kaleidoscope
Singapore2887 Posts
| ||
Plutonium
United States2217 Posts
On August 20 2010 20:44 Surrealz wrote: do you really want LAN? This is entirely the reason you need lan support. It's like, the damn poster for it. | ||
_magik
Netherlands146 Posts
That's the only way some pressure is put on actiblizz. | ||
Random()
Kyrgyz Republic1462 Posts
| ||
Everlong
Czech Republic1973 Posts
| ||
Phil4994
United States143 Posts
| ||
Trok67
France384 Posts
| ||
araged
Czech Republic189 Posts
On August 20 2010 20:44 odeSSa wrote: At least we got facebook integration! Actually I'd take FB integration over LAN anyday. All these hot chicks in my friendlist have to see how leet I'm by spamming some game's achievements all over my page. | ||
![]()
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
He probably just doesn't know the interview Special Endrey was referring to | ||
aznhockeyboy16
United States558 Posts
On August 20 2010 20:42 I_Love_Bacon wrote: So, him completely shutting down all of SarenS harass, including bunker opening without over committing to, was him being outplayed. SarenS was slow to expand and he was basically lucky that Idra decided to attack instead of stall the push a little bit longer since he had been on 2 bases and was just putting a 3rd up when the sieging was happening. Did idra make a few too many hydras? Yes, he also knew sarens was on 2 port so if he had continued with banshee production, without a spire he would have been in huge trouble if 6 banshees had shown up. The ONLY reason Idra lost that game was the choice to attack when his ultras were still in production, because at the very least that's like 1200/900 more that could have been in army, when he decided to attack, while Sarens was in basically the best possible position. but I will not disagree with you saying that Idra is the better player. also, Sarens is only a platinum player :D | ||
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
| ||
dadde
Italy314 Posts
PATCH i want to see waht's going to happen ! :D | ||
SagaZ
France3460 Posts
oh, and we can change our online name for free too! (once) | ||
keV.
United States3214 Posts
On August 20 2010 20:44 ViRtU4l wrote: Considering terrans don't have any macro mechanic to boost their drones / probes numbers like zerg (larvaes + queens) and protoss (chronoboost), terrans should be 7-8 behinds in term of workers counts at this stage of the game. 6 workers ahead IS HUGE - don't forget the mule ! SarenS definitely had the advantage here. I'll agree he had the advantage, but an advantage doesn't mean convincing lead. It's certainly not a game you could rule in SarenS favor at this point. | ||
baeracaed
United States604 Posts
| ||
Walde
Finland74 Posts
| ||
DeltruS
Canada2214 Posts
| ||
Everlong
Czech Republic1973 Posts
| ||
Doc Daneeka
United States577 Posts
| ||
| ||