|
On June 04 2010 07:20 Azarkon wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2010 06:48 Tropics wrote:
"not to take anything away from machine" means machines play was great, but white ra played terrible
its just another way of saying what you said. It's total nitpicking Right, and my point is that it does take something away from Machine, because the implication is that, since White-Ra played terrible, Machine isn't as good as a 4-1 against White-Ra would imply.
It annoys the hell out of me when people say things like "not to..." or "not that....", when it is obviously implied by the following statement.
Its just like when you say "no offense but..."
|
machine gave him the 3 HATCH SMACK. what amazing play from an amazing player. white-ra, back to the drawing board...
|
nvm lol
couldnt find the replays
thanks for making those showmatches thou
|
I thought white-ra played kinda disrespectful toward machine. He played pretty careless as if he underestimated him. I know he plays very agressively as I've played him many times in SC1, but he was throwing a lot of units away. Machine played very well and capitalized on those mistakes and won the series. Beating white-ra 4-1 is really good, he's one of the few people I've played in SC2 that I think have a very solid overall game and for anyone to beat them 4-1 is pretty good imo. GJ machine.
|
On June 04 2010 11:42 ilbh wrote:
nvm lol
couldnt find the replays
thanks for making those showmatches thou
are the machine whitera reps up? I could find all the other reps but not the whitera ones.
|
On June 04 2010 07:20 Azarkon wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2010 06:48 Tropics wrote:
"not to take anything away from machine" means machines play was great, but white ra played terrible
its just another way of saying what you said. It's total nitpicking Right, and my point is that it does take something away from Machine, because the implication is that, since White-Ra played terrible, Machine isn't as good as a 4-1 against White-Ra would imply.
obviously it takes something away from him. everyone reading that sentence knows that. the point of that qualifier is that im not just saying "machine is flat out shit and the only reason he won is because white ra played poorly" its that im saying white ra played terribly those games in comparison to his usual standard. machine doesn't factor into that at all, which is what that qualifier means.
|
|
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On June 04 2010 12:44 guitarizt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2010 11:42 ilbh wrote:
nvm lol
couldnt find the replays
thanks for making those showmatches thou are the machine whitera reps up? I could find all the other reps but not the whitera ones.
You guys kidding me? It is at the top of the OP in that thread.
|
incontrol can u reply my pm pls?
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
nah I can reply here: give me a link to a stream/website that you will be translating for.
|
|
|
add me on msn so we can talk
mimmothebull@hotmail.com
or skype vito.mule
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
Nothing to talk about dude. If you are actually translating for an audience via a website of Italians or something I would love to include you. Otherwise you will have to watch from the stream and listen in English/Russian.
It's just a 100$ showmatch dude o-O don't need PMs and conversations via skype etc lol
|
yes we will stream the games to italian ppl via livestream
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
sure PM me your email for bnet2 and I will add at the time of the match and invite.
|
|
|
It's be nice if you could number the replays.
Can't tell which game is first, second, etc.
edit: nvm I see the ordering of it now.
|
|
|
It looks like White-Ra threw the games, but that's just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
