• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:33
CEST 17:33
KST 00:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course10Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !8Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results12026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers25
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results
Tourneys
Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) 2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
ASL Tickets to Live Event Finals? [ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course Quality of life changes in BW that you will like ? Why there arent any 256x256 pro maps? RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] RO16 Group Stage - 02 - 10 May [ASL21] Ro8 Day 3
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates Muta micro map competition What's the deal with APM & what's its true value
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Daigo vs Menard Best of 10
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1738 users

17173.com Starcraft 2 World Cup - Page 61

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 59 60 61 62 63 148 Next
rOMi
Profile Joined April 2010
Korea (South)120 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 15:07:29
May 21 2010 14:50 GMT
#1201
Shame... I'm sure many people would agree it was unfair that xiaot advanced so easily
cyclone25
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Romania3344 Posts
May 21 2010 14:51 GMT
#1202
On May 21 2010 22:06 lolreaper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2010 22:01 skypacer wrote:
On May 21 2010 21:58 lolreaper wrote:
and worlds best terran gets raped hard by toss
but yea T is overrowered

First, Maka is not worlds no.1 Terran.
And Second, Maka's TvP is his weakest matchup.

seems like every terrans "weakness" is tvp nowadays
is there any terran who is strong vs protoss and can say he wins most of the tvp games? because except tester statement (who ironically is toss player himself) i cant find terran player who is happy with that MU


I wanna see some comments from you on Maka's last TvP matches xD
Bane_
Profile Joined October 2005
United Kingdom494 Posts
May 21 2010 14:51 GMT
#1203
You can't really say that though because xiaOt beat him...
antihope
Profile Joined May 2010
United States42 Posts
May 21 2010 14:51 GMT
#1204
Maka's timing is great, I think that's the second game his push arrived at the toss base after they spent money on templar tech + templars but before they got storm.
"Banshees make very good work" -Duckload
Bane_
Profile Joined October 2005
United Kingdom494 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 14:53:02
May 21 2010 14:52 GMT
#1205
I've been so busy trying to put an explanation in the first post that I missed the 2nd game. ^^ Did Maka win? Oh and could people read it for me and say if it just doesn't make sense at all?
antihope
Profile Joined May 2010
United States42 Posts
May 21 2010 14:53 GMT
#1206
On May 21 2010 23:52 Bane_ wrote:
I've been so busy trying to put an explanation in the first post that I missed the 2nd game. ^^ Did Maka win?


Yes ^^
"Banshees make very good work" -Duckload
Shizuru~
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Malaysia1676 Posts
May 21 2010 14:53 GMT
#1207
On May 21 2010 23:52 Bane_ wrote:
I've been so busy trying to put an explanation in the first post that I missed the 2nd game. ^^ Did Maka win? Oh and could people read it for me and say if it just doesn't make sense at all?


Maka won with marine/tank/banshee timing push.
frumplejoon
Profile Joined April 2010
United States129 Posts
May 21 2010 14:55 GMT
#1208
On May 21 2010 23:52 Bane_ wrote:
I've been so busy trying to put an explanation in the first post that I missed the 2nd game. ^^ Did Maka win? Oh and could people read it for me and say if it just doesn't make sense at all?


good explanation, tnx!
kheldorin
Profile Joined April 2010
Singapore539 Posts
May 21 2010 14:56 GMT
#1209
Protoss units just evaporated. I'm not saying that XiaoT should have come out on top in that battle. But the food difference after that fight is just ridiculous.
Tanatos
Profile Joined April 2010
United States381 Posts
May 21 2010 14:59 GMT
#1210
xiaot played great against anypro also.

I think it will be ok to have him in round of 16
Azarkon
Profile Joined January 2010
United States21060 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 15:01:59
May 21 2010 15:00 GMT
#1211
On May 21 2010 23:51 Bane_ wrote:
You can't really say that though because xiaOt beat him...


Yes he did, but he was beaten by Maka, whereas Anypro won against Maka. This is before any tiebreakers. Imagine that Nazgul wasn't part of the tournament. Then we can see that it's basically a three-way 1-1. Maka beat Xiaot but lost to Anypro. Anypro beat Maka but lost to Xiaot. Xiaot beat Anypro but lost to Maka.

In a contest of pure skill, there's no reason why Anypro should be out simply because he lost to Maka in the tiebreakers, unless Xiaot either beat him again or beat Maka.

As it is, Anypro got eliminated by a random number generator. Skill-wise, his TvP was clearly better than Xiaot's, though his PvP appears weaker since he lost to Xiaot and cheesed Nazgul for the win. Still, I don't think any pro-gamer would've been satisfied with an auto-lose due to rolling the lowest number.
Prodtoss
Profile Joined May 2010
China849 Posts
May 21 2010 15:03 GMT
#1212
On May 22 2010 00:00 Azarkon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2010 23:51 Bane_ wrote:
You can't really say that though because xiaOt beat him...


Yes he did, but he was beaten by Maka, whereas Anypro won against Maka. This is before any tiebreakers. Imagine that Nazgul wasn't part of the tournament. Then we can see that it's basically a three-way 1-1. Maka beat Xiaot but lost to Anypro. Anypro beat Maka but lost to Xiaot. Xiaot beat Anypro but lost to Maka.

In a contest of pure skill, there's no reason why Anypro should be out simply because he lost to Maka in the tiebreakers, unless Xiaot either beat him again or beat Maka.

As it is, Anypro got eliminated by a random number generator. Skill-wise, his TvP was clearly better than Xiaot's, though his PvP appears weaker since he lost to Xiaot and cheesed Nazgul for the win. Still, I don't think any pro-gamer would've been satisfied with an auto-lose due to rolling the lowest number.


Yep,so the day before yesterday ACE is beaten by rolled the smallest number,where are you?
hydraden
Profile Joined April 2010
United States719 Posts
May 21 2010 15:04 GMT
#1213
On May 22 2010 00:00 Azarkon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2010 23:51 Bane_ wrote:
You can't really say that though because xiaOt beat him...


Yes he did, but he was beaten by Maka, whereas Anypro won against Maka. This is before any tiebreakers. Imagine that Nazgul wasn't part of the tournament. Then we can see that it's basically a three-way 1-1. Maka beat Xiaot but lost to Anypro. Anypro beat Maka but lost to Xiaot. Xiaot beat Anypro but lost to Maka.

In a contest of pure skill, there's no reason why Anypro should be out simply because he lost to Maka in the tiebreakers, unless Xiaot either beat him again or beat Maka.

As it is, Anypro got eliminated by a random number generator. Skill-wise, his TvP was clearly better than Xiaot's, though his PvP appears weaker since he lost to Xiaot and cheesed Nazgul for the win. Still, I don't think any pro-gamer would've been satisfied with an auto-lose due to rolling the lowest number.


That's true, but they have no time for a potential dozen games tie-break.
Azarkon
Profile Joined January 2010
United States21060 Posts
May 21 2010 15:04 GMT
#1214
I wasn't watching.

But if I were, I'd probably have complained then, too.
Bane_
Profile Joined October 2005
United Kingdom494 Posts
May 21 2010 15:04 GMT
#1215
On May 22 2010 00:00 Azarkon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2010 23:51 Bane_ wrote:
You can't really say that though because xiaOt beat him...


Yes he did, but he was beaten by Maka, whereas Anypro won against Maka. This is before any tiebreakers. Imagine that Nazgul wasn't part of the tournament. Then we can see that it's basically a three-way 1-1. Maka beat Xiaot but lost to Anypro. Anypro beat Maka but lost to Xiaot. Xiaot beat Anypro but lost to Maka.

In a contest of pure skill, there's no reason why Anypro should be out simply because he lost to Maka in the tiebreakers, unless Xiaot either beat him again or beat Maka.

As it is, Anypro got eliminated by a random number generator. Skill-wise, his TvP was clearly better than Xiaot's, though his PvP appears weaker since he lost to Xiaot and cheesed Nazgul for the win. Still, I don't think any pro-gamer would've been satisfied with an auto-lose due to rolling the lowest number.


It wasn't an auto lose since if he had beaten Maka again in game 1 of the tie-break, he was guaranteed to progress to the round of 16. No doubt it's not an ideal system but I'm not entirely sure what would be.
Tanatos
Profile Joined April 2010
United States381 Posts
May 21 2010 15:05 GMT
#1216
Yes. it's their rule and we as spectator needs to accept it.
rOMi
Profile Joined April 2010
Korea (South)120 Posts
May 21 2010 15:06 GMT
#1217
An ideal system would be to have them play each other repeatedly until the 3 way "stalemate" is broken. Of course like someone said before they probably did not have time for that.
Azarkon
Profile Joined January 2010
United States21060 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 15:11:49
May 21 2010 15:06 GMT
#1218
On May 22 2010 00:04 Bane_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2010 00:00 Azarkon wrote:
On May 21 2010 23:51 Bane_ wrote:
You can't really say that though because xiaOt beat him...


Yes he did, but he was beaten by Maka, whereas Anypro won against Maka. This is before any tiebreakers. Imagine that Nazgul wasn't part of the tournament. Then we can see that it's basically a three-way 1-1. Maka beat Xiaot but lost to Anypro. Anypro beat Maka but lost to Xiaot. Xiaot beat Anypro but lost to Maka.

In a contest of pure skill, there's no reason why Anypro should be out simply because he lost to Maka in the tiebreakers, unless Xiaot either beat him again or beat Maka.

As it is, Anypro got eliminated by a random number generator. Skill-wise, his TvP was clearly better than Xiaot's, though his PvP appears weaker since he lost to Xiaot and cheesed Nazgul for the win. Still, I don't think any pro-gamer would've been satisfied with an auto-lose due to rolling the lowest number.


It wasn't an auto lose since if he had beaten Maka again in game 1 of the tie-break, he was guaranteed to progress to the round of 16. No doubt it's not an ideal system but I'm not entirely sure what would be.


Right, and this is where the system really breaks down because had Maka known about this - and I'm pretty sure he didn't if he said "fraud" - he would've had great incentive to drop the game to Anypro and then win against Xiaot - a feat he is easily capable of - to get his teammate into the Ro16.

It's just very open to abuse, and I think they should've played another set of games and then did a dice roll if it still wasn't clear. Of course the dice roll would have to be verified somehow, but I think that's not too hard if you use a third-party website.
Prodtoss
Profile Joined May 2010
China849 Posts
May 21 2010 15:12 GMT
#1219
XiaOt is the third player after Sen and White-Ra who can beat a Korean player in this tourney. He deserved advance in my opinion
Bane_
Profile Joined October 2005
United Kingdom494 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 15:14:23
May 21 2010 15:13 GMT
#1220
On May 22 2010 00:06 Azarkon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2010 00:04 Bane_ wrote:
On May 22 2010 00:00 Azarkon wrote:
On May 21 2010 23:51 Bane_ wrote:
You can't really say that though because xiaOt beat him...


Yes he did, but he was beaten by Maka, whereas Anypro won against Maka. This is before any tiebreakers. Imagine that Nazgul wasn't part of the tournament. Then we can see that it's basically a three-way 1-1. Maka beat Xiaot but lost to Anypro. Anypro beat Maka but lost to Xiaot. Xiaot beat Anypro but lost to Maka.

In a contest of pure skill, there's no reason why Anypro should be out simply because he lost to Maka in the tiebreakers, unless Xiaot either beat him again or beat Maka.

As it is, Anypro got eliminated by a random number generator. Skill-wise, his TvP was clearly better than Xiaot's, though his PvP appears weaker since he lost to Xiaot and cheesed Nazgul for the win. Still, I don't think any pro-gamer would've been satisfied with an auto-lose due to rolling the lowest number.


It wasn't an auto lose since if he had beaten Maka again in game 1 of the tie-break, he was guaranteed to progress to the round of 16. No doubt it's not an ideal system but I'm not entirely sure what would be.


Right, and this is where the system really breaks down because had Maka known about this - and I'm pretty sure he didn't if he said "fraud" - he would've had great incentive to drop the game to Anypro and then win against Xiaot - a feat he is easily capable of - to get his teammate into the Ro16.

It's just very open to abuse, and I think they should've played another set of games and then did a dice roll if it still wasn't clear. Of course the dice roll would have to be verified somehow, but I think that's not too hard if you use a third-party website.


In that situation it would have been Anypro vs xiaOt in game 2 instead with Anypro needing to win to let Maka advance also, and given how their first encounter went that was a far from guaranteed result.
Prev 1 59 60 61 62 63 148 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 27m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech147
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 7276
Bisu 3032
Jaedong 1386
Horang2 1062
EffOrt 919
Mini 514
Larva 369
Hyuk 316
ZerO 305
ggaemo 275
[ Show more ]
actioN 261
Rush 199
Snow 196
Soulkey 177
firebathero 149
Mind 144
Mong 107
Sharp 65
soO 57
Hyun 51
Barracks 47
Killer 39
Aegong 37
HiyA 34
Pusan 32
sorry 17
Movie 17
Hm[arnc] 16
Rock 15
IntoTheRainbow 14
Terrorterran 13
SilentControl 9
Bale 7
Dota 2
Gorgc5526
syndereN377
XcaliburYe194
monkeys_forever178
NeuroSwarm96
Counter-Strike
fl0m3470
olofmeister810
byalli428
Heroes of the Storm
MindelVK14
Other Games
B2W.Neo1050
Liquid`RaSZi920
hiko908
FrodaN603
Lowko417
Hui .369
KnowMe155
ArmadaUGS139
crisheroes127
Livibee46
Trikslyr34
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL32216
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 830
Other Games
WardiTV787
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP65
• LUISG 21
• StrangeGG 10
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 37
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis6089
• TFBlade1191
Other Games
• WagamamaTV455
• Shiphtur133
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
27m
OSC
8h 27m
CranKy Ducklings
18h 27m
Afreeca Starleague
18h 27m
Light vs Flash
PiGosaur Cup
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
OSC
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
BSL
5 days
GSL
5 days
Cure vs TBD
TBD vs Maru
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W7
YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.