good post!
Slush vs Artosis - Page 2
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Megalisk
United States6095 Posts
good post! | ||
Jascle
United States23 Posts
$10k Artosis v Slush grudge match inc? | ||
skYfiVe
United States382 Posts
Sure, there is sportmanship, where I do agree with Artosis on, but when there are referees, Slush can stand for his opinion as it is ultimately up to them anyways. Hopefully it won't happen again, but there is no way to guarantee it. Good response nonetheless. | ||
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
On May 09 2010 11:47 UbiNax wrote: good response Artosis needed an apology, and he got it. still waay to late. One thing i dont get though is that i know you said you were busy with another tournament nazgul but im sure that there were PLENTY of very high lvl players available out there to watch the replay and give their opinion, i mean after all you guys used quite some time coming up with the conclusion that it should be a regame or DQ there certainly were many top players watching this, demuslim said so himself, I dont know though if for example the TL admins had them in their friends list. On May 09 2010 11:47 Salv wrote: I don't see what TL has to apologize for. I can see where some one viewing the replay in a stressful situation would think that Slush had a minuscule chance of coming back, and clearly the protocol you described states that you should re-game in that situation. Was it mistake in hindsight? You have all apparently decided it was, but I think it's understandable. What isn't understandable is for Artosis to act like a child throwing a tantrum. Personally, I think Artosis forfeited his chance for a rematch with Slush with prizes at stake when he acted so ridiculously childish. Thinking in hindsight, he could have played the game, lost, made the complaint to TL admins after the tournament and received a show match with prizes at stake. It still would have been unfortunate that he would be eliminated, but I'm sure TL would be reviewing their process of handling these situations in this hypothetical as well, so the only difference is the shit storm that erupted. Oh yeah but you're being incredibly grown up with that signature of yours.. rofl | ||
infinity2k9
United Kingdom2397 Posts
| ||
Salv
Canada3083 Posts
On May 09 2010 11:47 Salv wrote: I don't see what TL has to apologize for. I can see where some one viewing the replay in a stressful situation would think that Slush had a minuscule chance of coming back, and clearly the protocol you described states that you should re-game in that situation. Was it mistake in hindsight? You have all apparently decided it was, but I think it's understandable. What isn't understandable is for Artosis to act like a child throwing a tantrum. Personally, I think Artosis forfeited his chance for a rematch with Slush with prizes at stake when he acted so ridiculously childish. Thinking in hindsight, he could have played the game, lost, made the complaint to TL admins after the tournament and received a show match with prizes at stake. It still would have been unfortunate that he would be eliminated, but I'm sure TL would be reviewing their process of handling these situations in this hypothetical as well, so the only difference is the shit storm that erupted. On May 09 2010 11:51 7mk wrote: Oh yeah but you're being incredibly grown up with that signature of yours.. rofl It's a hilarious quote. Nice red herring also, why don't you address the actual point of my post. | ||
skYfiVe
United States382 Posts
On May 09 2010 11:52 infinity2k9 wrote: I think some people seem to miss the fact that Artosis knew about this problem for ages, yet still entered a tournament for money knowing that he could disconnect at any time and knowing the rules for that. Its not like it was completely unexpected. Yeah, well is it really reasonable to expect someone to buy a new computer for a tournament right around the corner? There's not much he can do, and Artosis was reasonable about it by even explaining that it might happen... even saying he got the page pool error during their game. Sure, he was the one that disconnected, and I'm sure he knew the rules... as stated by TL it was a 100% win at that point. It isn't like Artosis deserved to receive the loss for a faulty computer. | ||
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
(Oops, players really want a chat system? Well, they're wrong! They don't know what they want.) | ||
Neverhood
United States5388 Posts
I watched the replay and thought 100% that Artosis should've been given the win, not a regame. Glad that this issue can be put to rest, although ;( no showcase rematch. | ||
![]()
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
| ||
Saig0n
United States100 Posts
| ||
artanis2
United States732 Posts
| ||
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
![]() everythingwentbetterthanexpected.jpg | ||
GenoZStriker
United States2914 Posts
| ||
infinity2k9
United Kingdom2397 Posts
On May 09 2010 11:54 skYfiVe wrote: Yeah, well is it really reasonable to expect someone to buy a new computer for a tournament right around the corner? There's not much he can do, and Artosis was reasonable about it by even explaining that it might happen... even saying he got the page pool error during their game. Sure, he was the one that disconnected, and I'm sure he knew the rules... as stated by TL it was a 100% win at that point. It isn't like Artosis deserved to receive the loss for a faulty computer. I think its reasonable not to play in a tournament knowing it might happen at some point. I don't believe that a whole new computer would be needed to fix the problem anyway (sounds like RAM issue?), and hes known there's a problem at least since 22nd April when its mentioned on his twitter. You can't go into games like this just hoping you won't DC. After all he is supposed to now be a progamer on a proteam so you'd expect not to be knowingly play with faulty equipment. | ||
mechos
United States12 Posts
| ||
Bigpon86
United States238 Posts
| ||
skYfiVe
United States382 Posts
On May 09 2010 11:57 artanis2 wrote: Artosis needs to stop bawwing and fix his fucking computer. That is the root cause of the entire problem. This is pretty unnecessary honestly.. at least be constructive with your post... it isn't like money grows on trees for new computers either. | ||
Psiven
United States148 Posts
| ||
damon2400
United States172 Posts
On May 09 2010 11:54 Salv wrote: It's a hilarious quote. Nice red herring also, why don't you address the actual point of my post. More like genetic fallacy bud. | ||
| ||