Slush vs Artosis - Page 16

On May 09 2010 17:58 IntoTheWow wrote:


loooooooooool

On May 09 2010 18:20 xxjondxx wrote:
I think the fact that Artosis could have easily dced when slush was in a lead should be a big reason in having to regame.

On May 09 2010 18:25 BroOd wrote:
You wouldn't blacklist a soccer player who didn't report his own handball, would you? Or a football player who didn't report his own facemask penalty?

On May 09 2010 16:54 ret wrote:


To me this is the only thing to take from this. I can't believe a player who's been invited to a tournament for the beta of a game would try to get a regame when he is skilled enough to know that he had lost the game beyond a shadow of doubt.

Mistakes happen, it was not TL's intention at all to do anything but the right thing here. And a showmatch with Artosis seems like a great way to fix this. But man...Slush...how badly do you need money? :S

On May 09 2010 19:09 dogabutila wrote:


Entirely different situation my friend.

If I stand to gain something by not speaking up then why would I ever speak up?
However in this situation not only do I stand to gain, but another stands to lose by my inaction. Is it fair that because of my selfishness, greed, and lack of morals that I would cause another who should rightfully gain something to lose it?


I just cannot understand the people who feel as if slush did nothing wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(criminal_law)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_rescue

On May 09 2010 19:21 El_Cid wrote:
I just watched the replay - the match wasn't over... yes Artosis was winning - but it wasn't a gg situation yet... how is it Slush's fault that his opponent got DC'ed.

What if all matches would be like this - and if you DCed you would still get the win because you were having some kind of an advantage. You would see them pull the plug every other match.

Its not Slush's fault - and the decision was CORRECT!
You DC - and you have an advantage - you REMATCH buddy - thats it!
You DC - and you are loosing - you loose!

Simple as that... This was a big mistake by Nazgul! Throwing the blame on Slush because they are not men enough to support the consequences of their decisions.

On May 09 2010 19:19 BroOd wrote:

How is that different exactly? In Ireland vs France World Cup qualifiers, Thierry Henry handballed a goal that put France in the World Cup and left Ireland out. Should he have reported himself to the referee?

On May 09 2010 19:28 drewbie.root wrote:


i agree... game was definitely not over yet

On May 09 2010 11 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              09 2010 11      end_of_the_skype_highlighting:48 Jascle wrote:
Really glad Nazgul owned it. Now there won't be any lingering awkwardness going forward.

$10k Artosis v Slush grudge match inc?

On May 09 2010 19:29 milkywaywu wrote:


In fairness of the sport yes. Yes he should have.

Was it something you can blame the guy for? Not really.

It's never alright to do unfair things to get ahead. That is what we as people want to believe and want to achieve as mankind evolves.

In no way am I bashing Slush as I believe it was really an officiating error that spawned from inproper protocol taken by the referees (asking for Slush's take on the matter).

On May 09 2010 19:33 Full.tilt wrote:


No more awkwardness? TL have caved to Artosis and have not mentioned his child's tantrum in this statement nor have they apologised to Slush for implying his win of the tournament is invalid.

On May 09 2010 19:19 drewbie.root wrote:
maybe he thought he could win still? maybe he thought he could kill that attack with drones + muta + corruptors+ roaches, and artosis really had no other units, and he wouldve had 2 expos up. I know that artosis had a huge advantage, but im sure that 99% of u in slush's position would not just say " ok u win "