• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:15
CEST 17:15
KST 00:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview11TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection5Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2
Community News
[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June2Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th151Weekly Cups (May 18-24): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League6
StarCraft 2
General
TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes? Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview What kind of tool would you be interested in? Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) WardiTV Mondays Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected Welcome to the External Content forum
Brood War
General
25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 FlaSh's ASL S21 Finals Review BW animated web series: seeking contributors BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June
Tourneys
[BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST [ASL21] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Megathread Summer Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game Path of Exile
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Esportsmanship: How to NOT B…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5134 users

The Art of Cannon Rushing - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
Fat_Elephant
Profile Joined May 2013
Angola54 Posts
March 21 2015 01:23 GMT
#21
Brilliant!
I support and use Ad-blocker for this site as matter of convenience and disregard TL's financial responsibilities.
AkashSky
Profile Joined May 2014
United States257 Posts
March 21 2015 05:06 GMT
#22
I love how you use mathematics and apply them to starcraft! I am a big fan of the previous post on unit accelleration as well.

For a future project, could you perhaps calculate mineral mining efficiency on various maps? I notice that I get a lot more money on overgrowth than on other maps in the early game. I think this is because of the mineral placement, but are there any mathematical limitations on this?

The Art of cannon rushing was a really good read. Keep up the good work!
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
March 21 2015 06:43 GMT
#23
Cannon rushing is an art unto itself. $O$ knows this to be true, we must all follow in his footsteps, as one of the protoss gods, joining the ranks of our other deities such as InCa.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-22 18:30:36
March 22 2015 18:04 GMT
#24
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
March 22 2015 21:10 GMT
#25
Also, I just spend the last 3 hours reading all of these articles you've made, so there goes a bunch of productivity time. Great reads, I love the math. I hope you continue making these
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
Ovid
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
United Kingdom948 Posts
March 22 2015 21:29 GMT
#26
On March 23 2015 03:04 printf wrote:
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)


Print the maximum area on one Pylon is 4 if at the top of the ramp.
I will make Yogg Saron priest work...
TelecoM
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States10743 Posts
March 22 2015 21:45 GMT
#27
Amazing, just simply amazing work. Thank you for this!
AKA: TelecoM[WHITE] Protoss fighting
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-22 22:14:51
March 22 2015 22:14 GMT
#28
On March 23 2015 06:29 Ovid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2015 03:04 printf wrote:
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)


Print the maximum area on one Pylon is 4 if at the top of the ramp.


I was referring specifically to the values listed in the OP for the wall on overgrowth, which listed 6 as the weakness value for all 3 pylons. I may be mistaken, but I don't believe I ever mentioned walls at the top of the ramp
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
Florencio
Profile Joined May 2017
1 Post
Last Edited: 2019-05-20 01:53:10
May 19 2019 09:36 GMT
#29
Mod edit: Link removed.

User was banned for this post.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26970 Posts
May 21 2019 12:47 GMT
#30
This makes me feel satisfyingly dirty to read, I have a friend who has a whole notebook of placements and progressions that he brings to tournies

Truly an art form
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
General_Winter
Profile Joined February 2011
United States719 Posts
May 22 2019 01:41 GMT
#31
Was that a fake account or the real Florencio? The real one is semi famous as a commonly featured master level cheesier on Pig’s you tube channel.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-22 02:47:25
May 22 2019 02:38 GMT
#32
On May 22 2019 10:41 General_Winter wrote:
Was that a fake account or the real Florencio? The real one is semi famous as a commonly featured master level cheesier on Pig’s you tube channel.


Real I think, but creating an account and bumping old threads to post links to your own Youtube channel still falls under advertising. If he wants to post his own content it's supposed to go in the External Content forum and have more content than just a link to a video.
Jamesrr332
Profile Joined May 2019
2 Posts
May 30 2019 19:18 GMT
#33
--- Nuked ---
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Ryung 275
ProTech99
Codebar 85
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 6062
Shuttle 1950
EffOrt 1319
Hyuk 492
Mini 462
Rush 232
Soulkey 231
firebathero 205
ggaemo 197
hero 83
[ Show more ]
Sea.KH 78
Free 78
Pusan 71
Hyun 60
Backho 44
scan(afreeca) 41
JYJ 40
ToSsGirL 38
Aegong 33
Barracks 28
GoRush 22
sorry 20
zelot 18
IntoTheRainbow 16
Rock 15
Terrorterran 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
SilentControl 9
Hm[arnc] 9
soO 4
Dota 2
Gorgc8297
qojqva2294
Dendi1759
Fuzer 144
League of Legends
Reynor70
Counter-Strike
fl0m6741
zeus312
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox605
Mew2King44
Other Games
gofns18563
tarik_tv9109
singsing2708
Lowko877
hiko641
byalli566
B2W.Neo480
DeMusliM368
crisheroes171
C9.Mang0130
Hui .118
QueenE67
ArmadaUGS60
Liquid`VortiX56
Trikslyr21
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV219
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 27
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 13
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota228
League of Legends
• Nemesis3993
• Jankos2034
• TFBlade729
Other Games
• WagamamaTV214
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
8h 45m
Replay Cast
17h 45m
Kung Fu Cup
19h 45m
Maestros of the Game
23h 45m
Classic vs Lambo
Clem vs Maru
Replay Cast
1d 8h
The PondCast
1d 18h
Maestros of the Game
1d 23h
Serral vs Rogue
herO vs SHIN
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Maestros of the Game
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
OSC
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 22
2026 GSL S2
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
Acropolis #4 - GSB
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
Maestros of the Game 2
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026

Upcoming

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #3
Heroes Pulsing #2
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.