• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:57
CEST 08:57
KST 15:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters9[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism5Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?118Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? [ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters ASL22 General Discussion Pros React To: Calm's Big Brain Play Vs Mini New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2v2v2v2 Tournament [ASL22] Ro16 Group A
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
F* the Children and Get Off …
TrAiDoS
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5812 users

The Art of Cannon Rushing - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
Fat_Elephant
Profile Joined May 2013
Angola54 Posts
March 21 2015 01:23 GMT
#21
Brilliant!
I support and use Ad-blocker for this site as matter of convenience and disregard TL's financial responsibilities.
AkashSky
Profile Joined May 2014
United States257 Posts
March 21 2015 05:06 GMT
#22
I love how you use mathematics and apply them to starcraft! I am a big fan of the previous post on unit accelleration as well.

For a future project, could you perhaps calculate mineral mining efficiency on various maps? I notice that I get a lot more money on overgrowth than on other maps in the early game. I think this is because of the mineral placement, but are there any mathematical limitations on this?

The Art of cannon rushing was a really good read. Keep up the good work!
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
March 21 2015 06:43 GMT
#23
Cannon rushing is an art unto itself. $O$ knows this to be true, we must all follow in his footsteps, as one of the protoss gods, joining the ranks of our other deities such as InCa.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-22 18:30:36
March 22 2015 18:04 GMT
#24
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
March 22 2015 21:10 GMT
#25
Also, I just spend the last 3 hours reading all of these articles you've made, so there goes a bunch of productivity time. Great reads, I love the math. I hope you continue making these
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
Ovid
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
United Kingdom948 Posts
March 22 2015 21:29 GMT
#26
On March 23 2015 03:04 printf wrote:
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)


Print the maximum area on one Pylon is 4 if at the top of the ramp.
I will make Yogg Saron priest work...
TelecoM
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States10846 Posts
March 22 2015 21:45 GMT
#27
Amazing, just simply amazing work. Thank you for this!
AKA: TelecoM[WHITE] Protoss fighting
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-22 22:14:51
March 22 2015 22:14 GMT
#28
On March 23 2015 06:29 Ovid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2015 03:04 printf wrote:
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)


Print the maximum area on one Pylon is 4 if at the top of the ramp.


I was referring specifically to the values listed in the OP for the wall on overgrowth, which listed 6 as the weakness value for all 3 pylons. I may be mistaken, but I don't believe I ever mentioned walls at the top of the ramp
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
Florencio
Profile Joined May 2017
1 Post
Last Edited: 2019-05-20 01:53:10
May 19 2019 09:36 GMT
#29
Mod edit: Link removed.

User was banned for this post.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27336 Posts
May 21 2019 12:47 GMT
#30
This makes me feel satisfyingly dirty to read, I have a friend who has a whole notebook of placements and progressions that he brings to tournies

Truly an art form
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
General_Winter
Profile Joined February 2011
United States719 Posts
May 22 2019 01:41 GMT
#31
Was that a fake account or the real Florencio? The real one is semi famous as a commonly featured master level cheesier on Pig’s you tube channel.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-22 02:47:25
May 22 2019 02:38 GMT
#32
On May 22 2019 10:41 General_Winter wrote:
Was that a fake account or the real Florencio? The real one is semi famous as a commonly featured master level cheesier on Pig’s you tube channel.


Real I think, but creating an account and bumping old threads to post links to your own Youtube channel still falls under advertising. If he wants to post his own content it's supposed to go in the External Content forum and have more content than just a link to a video.
Jamesrr332
Profile Joined May 2019
2 Posts
May 30 2019 19:18 GMT
#33
--- Nuked ---
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 3m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EnDerr 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 4586
Rain 1713
BeSt 265
Leta 121
sSak 90
Hm[arnc] 72
Mind 39
Yoon 35
Bale 26
ZergMaN 12
[ Show more ]
Icarus 8
Noble 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever296
League of Legends
JimRising 730
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox462
Other Games
summit1g8031
WinterStarcraft496
ceh9340
Happy220
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH335
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• Light_VIP 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21202
• lizZardDota2111
League of Legends
• Lourlo1151
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
4h 3m
Replay Cast
17h 3m
The PondCast
1d 3h
KCM Race Survival
1d 3h
Escore
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
BlizzCon
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
GSL
6 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-08
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.