• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:31
CEST 05:31
KST 12:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho0Code S RO8 Preview: ByuN, Rogue, herO, Cure3[ASL19] Ro4 Preview: Storied Rivals7Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, sOs, Reynor, Solar15
Community News
Code S Season 1 - RO8 Group A Results (2025)0Dark to begin military service on May 13th (2025)20Weekly Cups (May 5-11): New 2v2 Champs1Maru & Rogue GSL RO12 interviews: "I think the pressure really got to [trigger]"5Code S Season 1 - Maru & Rogue advance to RO80
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 - RO8 Group A Results (2025) Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho Dark to begin military service on May 13th (2025) Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025) 2024/25 Off-Season Roster Moves
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group B Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Monday Nights Weeklies [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group A
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site [ASL19] Ro4 Preview: Storied Rivals
Tourneys
[ASL19] Semifinal B [ASL19] Semifinal A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL Nation Wars 2 - Grand Finals - Saturday 21:00
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Grand Theft Auto VI Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! Iraq & Syrian Civil Wars UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
Racial Distribution over MMR …
Navane
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 16063 users

The Art of Cannon Rushing - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
Fat_Elephant
Profile Joined May 2013
Angola54 Posts
March 21 2015 01:23 GMT
#21
Brilliant!
I support and use Ad-blocker for this site as matter of convenience and disregard TL's financial responsibilities.
AkashSky
Profile Joined May 2014
United States257 Posts
March 21 2015 05:06 GMT
#22
I love how you use mathematics and apply them to starcraft! I am a big fan of the previous post on unit accelleration as well.

For a future project, could you perhaps calculate mineral mining efficiency on various maps? I notice that I get a lot more money on overgrowth than on other maps in the early game. I think this is because of the mineral placement, but are there any mathematical limitations on this?

The Art of cannon rushing was a really good read. Keep up the good work!
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
March 21 2015 06:43 GMT
#23
Cannon rushing is an art unto itself. $O$ knows this to be true, we must all follow in his footsteps, as one of the protoss gods, joining the ranks of our other deities such as InCa.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-22 18:30:36
March 22 2015 18:04 GMT
#24
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
March 22 2015 21:10 GMT
#25
Also, I just spend the last 3 hours reading all of these articles you've made, so there goes a bunch of productivity time. Great reads, I love the math. I hope you continue making these
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
Ovid
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
United Kingdom948 Posts
March 22 2015 21:29 GMT
#26
On March 23 2015 03:04 printf wrote:
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)


Print the maximum area on one Pylon is 4 if at the top of the ramp.
I will make Yogg Saron priest work...
TelecoM
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States10666 Posts
March 22 2015 21:45 GMT
#27
Amazing, just simply amazing work. Thank you for this!
AKA: TelecoM[WHITE] Protoss fighting
printf
Profile Joined July 2014
United States13 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-22 22:14:51
March 22 2015 22:14 GMT
#28
On March 23 2015 06:29 Ovid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2015 03:04 printf wrote:
Hello, firstly I would like to compliment you on this very thorough and mathematical guide to cannon rushing.

However, as a top masters cannon rusher (I haven't quite gotten GM yet though), there are a few things I would like to note.

PvP
+ Show Spoiler +

For PvP, I think you discounted 4 pylon wall offs far too quickly. I understand and agree with your assertion that pvz they're far too expensive, but in PvP you're all in anyway, and a 4 pylon wall off with often allow you to execute a direct, rather than an indirect, cannon rush. The reason why this works requires analyzing a variable that you exempted entirely from all of your calculations, however. You did a good job of accounting for the time it takes to kill the pylons (although there's another issue with how you did this that I'll address in a different spoiler tag), but you didn't account for the ability to reinforce pylons.

When one pylon is killed, it is possible to build a backup pylon directly behind it, with a 1 hex overlap, such that the attacking probes cannot break through the wall. With 3 pylon walls this is usually impossible, which is why I don't ever recommend a 3 pylon wall off in PvP unless it's indirect, but with a 4 pylon wall it's generally very possible. By utilizing backup pylons, you can virtually guarantee that a cannon finishes (although 10 gate fast zealot can screw with this).

The immediate question that should be asked now is whether or not the 4 pylon wall can be blocked before it gets placed. After all, it is being built directly behind the mineral line. The answer to this, of course, varies from map to map and wall off to wall off, however the best 4 pylon walls cannot actually be blocked, even with a 0 second response time (this one for example) (although I'll admit in the video I did a poor job of proving this, I actually timed it out once and it does indeed take more time to block it than to create it).

Next are the ideas that have been presented already in this thread, of either making a ninja expansion or proxying void rays. A ninja CAN work if you also ninja your cybernetics core. If you fail to do this second step, you'll lose all your tech and die to a 4 gate. Even if you do ninja your cyber however, you still are behind, because you lose a significant amount of mining time.

Proxy voids shouldn't work unless the cannon rusher screws up. It's a very simple procedure to proxy a gateway and cybernetics core at the other guy's base, get a couple assimilators back home, and then pump out stalkers. In 99.9% of cases you won't be able to afford a second void ray, and it only takes 3 stalkers to kill one void. The only time you can get a second void is if the cannon rush is indirect, you don't do anything to stop it, and you let all your probes die mining every last mineral possible. Even then it's not guaranteed. Void rays are damn expensive.

EDIT: it should be mentioned that the responses to ninja's and proxy voids only work if you see it coming before it actually happens. Proxy void is telegraphed very early by continued gas mining without commitment to a stalker or mothership core in defense. The gas has to be going somewhere, and the only real option is proxied void rays. As far as a ninja goes, it's pretty much the same situation, except gas mining may be cut, and a mothership core may be built for counter harass (which is shut down by a single cannon in the mineral line).

EDIT 2: I just noticed the OP also mentions a counter-attacking with stalkers and a mothership core. This can work, and is actually highly effective, but only in certain scenarios. If the cannon rush is indirect and originates at the ramp, then it's a simple matter to trap the stalkers, and a mothership core by itself is no threat. If, however, you can stall the cannon rush until you have 3-4 stalkers, then you can take those and counterattack, and which point it becomes very difficult to hold. A wall off at the ramp which emergency cannons is the best response, and can actually hold this counter-attack with a probe pull, but if this counter-attack is accompanied by a ninja base, then it might do enough damage to get back in the game, and possibly even get ahead. If more than 1 stalker gets into the main base, especially with a mothership core as support, it's very likely GG


Pylon weakness and cannon weakness
+ Show Spoiler +

Ok, so on the topic of pylon weakness. I appreciate the math you did, regarding how long it takes to kill a pylon, and this is very nice, and very relevant. The only issue is some of the conclusions you reaches based on this math. Take the overgrowth triple pylon as an example. If 12 drones are pulled, 6 on the top left pylon and 6 on the bottom left pylon, then according to your math it will take 34 seconds to kill those 2 pylons. Since a cannon takes 45 seconds, on top of the 25 from a pylon, this leaves 36 seconds to kill the cannon, which can now be attacked from something like 260 degrees. (it's also possible I misread this and that the 14 seconds weren't accounted for by the 34 rating, but this still leaves 20 seconds of 6-8 drones attacking the cannon, which should be enough)

Basically, while the pylons will finish, allowing the cannon to be planted, the pylons can be killed in time to expose the cannon to be killed. Pulling 12 drones as in the example I gave is, of course, a significant commitment from the zerg, and requires the drones to be micro'd to get maximum surface area on the pylons, but it will shut down the cannon rush (theoretically) (I use an entirely different cannon rushing style myself, so I can't speak from experience. But this entire post is working off theory and math, so I think that this is still relevant).


Building extraneous pylons
+ Show Spoiler +

The mark of a skilled cannon rusher (in my eyes) is the minimalist quality of building as few structures as absolutely necessary, so I'm going to have to disagree with you regarding "For this reason, make sure that when you build your first Pylon, you build the other two immediately afterwards". If at all possible, don't build those additional 2 pylons. If you are forced to build them by a drone pull, and then the zerg retreats the drones after you place them, then make sure you cancel those pylons. Letting them finish is an absolute waste of 200 minerals, especially considering how likely the zerg is to cancel the hatchery. As long as you're paying attention, you shouldn't be caught off guard by a drone pull, and having the placement blocked shouldn't be a legitimate issue.

This goes for PvP as well when executing an indirect cannon rush, as on Overgrowth with the 3 pylon wall directly next to the ramp. If at all possible, avoid building the extra 2 pylons to finish the wall, it's possible the other player won't even notice it happening, and you would have just thrown away an entire cannon worth of minerals for no reason.


There are also a bunch of tricks and techniques that can be used for cannon rushing that aren't covered here, which I don't feel like writing down so I'll just link to a video I made for them (technically this is a playlist, the first 2 videos in the playlist are to what I am referring) (there are couple more that I forgot to put in the videos, such as using 2 pylons at the bottom of a ramp to wall in stalkers, rather than needing a pylon and a gate. I'll make another video at some point with all the stuff I forgot).


Anyway, despite how my tone may have come across, I really do think that this write-up was well done and well researched (although I do resent the assertion that cannon rushing doesn't require skill).


Also, on the topic of PvT
+ Show Spoiler +

Cannon rushing PvT I don't think should work, but yet even at top masters, and frequently playing GM's, I manage to pull a 40% win rate in the matchup. The reason it shouldn't work is that marines are ranged, and therefore very good at killing walled-in cannons, killing probes, and denying cannon creep. The reason it works is that a lot of people are uneducated about cannon rushes, and, like many people in this thread, think that flying away will solve all your problems. If you fly away, you die. Even if the scv's aren't all trapped, the lost mining time and, more importantly, tactically disadvantageous position of the new base, mean that it's easy to win with proxied zealots/stalkers or a 4 gate. I rarely lose to a terran flying away. Also, if the cannon rusher includes gateways in the rush, it is possible, although very difficult and requiring a lot of apm/multitasking from both players, to harass one side of the base with zealots, while building cannons on the other side of the base. Because marines can't be in 2 places at once, this can eventually reach the mineral line and win the game.

If you are ever playing against somebody you know will cannon rush you, just go 11/11 double rax at home, and pump a billion marines for a free win. If you are opening standard and get cannon rushed, then know that reapers are your friend if you can send them to the protoss base (this forces out 2 defensive cannons), or alternatively a well-placed bunker with a bunch of marines is very strong. Be sure to pull scv's though to force the protoss to invest into the full wall-off (because, as I mentioned earlier, an adept cannon rusher will not waste 200 minerals if at all avoidable)


Print the maximum area on one Pylon is 4 if at the top of the ramp.


I was referring specifically to the values listed in the OP for the wall on overgrowth, which listed 6 as the weakness value for all 3 pylons. I may be mistaken, but I don't believe I ever mentioned walls at the top of the ramp
I had an oracle built against me one game, so I lost that game
Florencio
Profile Joined May 2017
1 Post
Last Edited: 2019-05-20 01:53:10
May 19 2019 09:36 GMT
#29
Mod edit: Link removed.

User was banned for this post.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24424 Posts
May 21 2019 12:47 GMT
#30
This makes me feel satisfyingly dirty to read, I have a friend who has a whole notebook of placements and progressions that he brings to tournies

Truly an art form
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
General_Winter
Profile Joined February 2011
United States719 Posts
May 22 2019 01:41 GMT
#31
Was that a fake account or the real Florencio? The real one is semi famous as a commonly featured master level cheesier on Pig’s you tube channel.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-22 02:47:25
May 22 2019 02:38 GMT
#32
On May 22 2019 10:41 General_Winter wrote:
Was that a fake account or the real Florencio? The real one is semi famous as a commonly featured master level cheesier on Pig’s you tube channel.


Real I think, but creating an account and bumping old threads to post links to your own Youtube channel still falls under advertising. If he wants to post his own content it's supposed to go in the External Content forum and have more content than just a link to a video.
Jamesrr332
Profile Joined May 2019
2 Posts
May 30 2019 19:18 GMT
#33
--- Nuked ---
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
StarCraft Evolution League #11
CranKy Ducklings88
LiquipediaDiscussion
The PiG Daily
23:55
GSL Ro8 Replay Cast
Rogue vs ByuN
herO vs Cure
PiGStarcraft481
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft481
RuFF_SC2 185
NeuroSwarm 150
Nina 108
ProTech59
Ketroc 45
CosmosSc2 42
StarCraft: Brood War
NaDa 55
KwarK 19
Sexy 18
Terrorterran 18
Icarus 8
Shuttle 0
League of Legends
JimRising 772
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1897
Stewie2K787
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0540
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor132
Other Games
summit1g8931
hungrybox1375
shahzam553
Maynarde222
ViBE216
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1043
BasetradeTV192
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv120
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH246
• practicex 30
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4020
• Lourlo638
• Stunt287
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
5h 59m
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
The PondCast
6h 29m
RSL Revival
19h 29m
GSL Code S
1d 5h
herO vs TBD
TBD vs Cure
OSC
1d 20h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
SOOP
2 days
HeRoMaRinE vs Astrea
Online Event
3 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Percival vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Spirit
MaxPax vs Jumy
RSL Revival
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
2025 GSL S1
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

NPSL S3
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.