Thanks! This is the kind of highly detailed information that I'd imagine popping up at the highest levels of SC2 competition, yet here you are. Glad to see you being so dedicated to researching the Starcraft 2 physics to the core, it's the kind of research I'd love to see Liquipedia overflow with

Doctorasul

Romania1145 Posts

October 28 2012 10:28 GMT

#82

It's knowing things like this that makes a game mature.

zatic

Zurich15345 Posts

October 28 2012 10:32 GMT

#83

Moving to Strategy

Blink_SC2

England11 Posts

October 28 2012 10:36 GMT

#84

Amazing post thankyou

Silvanel

Poland4731 Posts

October 28 2012 10:38 GMT

#85

Gj. Nice post!

KenZo-

Faroe Islands190 Posts

October 28 2012 10:39 GMT

#86

Very good work man

keep it up. Interesting read to say the least.

Veriol

Czech Republic502 Posts

October 28 2012 10:45 GMT

#87

Really good thread. Although i dont think its as huge of deal in long game. But in main when there is this "red" gas taking it as first can really hurt yours early to mid game (the differential is about 180 gas - and thats quite alot at that stage of game)

dynwar7

1983 Posts

October 28 2012 10:53 GMT

#88

So basically, if the vespene geysers are too far, you have to put 4 workers, is that it?

Sorry, in a rush at the moment, just curious what the tl;dr is

RustySpork

United Kingdom49 Posts

October 28 2012 10:55 GMT

#89

wow amazing post - funny that the maps which are the worst in this regard are blizzard maps

Psilo

United States115 Posts

October 28 2012 10:57 GMT

#90

Oh wow this is amazing.

Ender985

Spain910 Posts

October 28 2012 11:00 GMT

#91

It is always refreshing to read a post like this. Kudos to the OP!

A little disappointed by the lack of drama however.

Cute_Fluff

Israel14 Posts

October 28 2012 11:03 GMT

#92

wow buddy !!! GREAT Work !!!! and it seems truly logical. btw @divec is correct i think, about the same influence regarding mineral patches (and im not even talking about discrtict 10 4v4 map which has minerals at ur main u can only mine from behind....)
although im all fore creativity and not using "base+min+gas" templates - there has to be some indication to map creators about efficiency of gas/mineral income, should be a piece of cake for blizz after you did all the research and hard work!!!

:D :D :D

such awesome community

great work!

any1 has some more drama left...? im running low...

firehand101

Australia3152 Posts

October 28 2012 11:16 GMT

#93

holy fuck you're amazing

Signum

Canada99 Posts

October 28 2012 11:16 GMT

#94

On October 28 2012 16:46 Chriscras wrote:
SPOTLIGHT THIS POST <3

Spotlight: TL user discovers info from 2010.

Leviance

Germany4079 Posts

October 28 2012 11:22 GMT

#95

Really nice OP. Thank you for your effort!

Okiesmokie

Canada379 Posts

October 28 2012 11:31 GMT

#96

On October 28 2012 16:14 torm wrote:
misleading thread title. also, strategy section?

This isn't a strategy, nor is the title misleading. Try actually reading the post.

mizU

United States12125 Posts

October 28 2012 11:31 GMT

#97

Amazing research.

SeraKuDA

Canada343 Posts

October 28 2012 11:35 GMT

#98

What, this is old news... No?

sonobeno

United Kingdom66 Posts

October 28 2012 11:38 GMT

#99

you are a pretty big nerd aren't you...?

Interesting stuff nonetheless, now I have new excuses for loosing!

Surili

United Kingdom1141 Posts

October 28 2012 11:41 GMT

#100

Someone posted this before, but never did all the research. I could tell from some time ago that especially entombed was really badly done for gases, and have been adding 4 to the far gases in most games, but nice to see someone do the maths.