[!] A WARNING (Purge) - Page 2
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
![]()
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
| ||
Sermokala
United States13875 Posts
On April 08 2011 11:11 Saracen wrote: [*]If your thread is about a new strategy and you do not have a damn good analysis (with replays) (i.e. I think your thread is too theorycrafty), you can play against me in a BO3 with your strategy. If you lose, you will be BANNED. ] wow thats an epic rule sounds really really good and something I would watch | ||
Whole
United States6046 Posts
On April 08 2011 11:52 jalstar wrote: I completely disagree with macro being the only thing necessary to get to a high level. Maybe in some matchups, but in volatile matchups like TvZ (both sides) only macroing and never looking at your army will get you a quick loss. Making the wrong unit comp will get you a quick loss. Not knowing the proper response to all common cheeses will get you many losses. So my response to: is that it takes time to improve macro and micro, and some people would actually like to win games while improving. I think Saracen is talking about people who post about why they lost when it was obvious that they just A-Moved in a situation where they needed to micro or just got massively out-macroed and those factors were the reason of the loss. | ||
Defeat
United States476 Posts
| ||
Tennet
United States1458 Posts
| ||
Saracen
United States5139 Posts
On April 08 2011 12:00 Defeat wrote: Might I suggest another forum/subforum for people seeking help. It would be used to post replays and ask what said person did wrong and other replay analysis.Then keep the strategy section purely for such threads as CecilSunkure's PvT 3 gate expo and others along those lines. We're discussing it. | ||
RAGEMOAR The Pope
United States216 Posts
Can't wait to see what the forum looks like after some purging. Keep up the good work admins. | ||
MuteZephyr
Lithuania448 Posts
On April 08 2011 11:11 Saracen wrote: If your thread is about a new strategy and you do not have a damn good analysis (with replays) (i.e. I think your thread is too theorycrafty), you can play against me in a BO3 with your strategy. If you lose, you will be BANNED. This is my favorite part :D Will you please post the replays when you're done winning as a grim reminder to all aspiring challengers? I'm happy to see these changes. I might visit the strategy forum for actual strategy now that it won't be littered with "you lost cuz *** is IMBA". Thanks! | ||
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
gl hf | ||
AirbladeOrange
United States2573 Posts
| ||
Mailing
United States3087 Posts
Joking, Saracen. ![]() I just read this forum and I know how hard modding it has been the last few months for you all. | ||
michaelhasanalias
Korea (South)1231 Posts
| ||
iamke55
United States2806 Posts
On April 08 2011 11:57 Whole wrote: I think Saracen is talking about people who post about why they lost when it was obvious that they just A-Moved in a situation where they needed to micro or just got massively out-macroed and those factors were the reason of the loss. Saracen just wants more people to read Plexa's thread on how to analyze replays so they can help themselves and not clutter the forum. Too often there are [H] threads made here by frustrated/lazy people who refuse to do their own work analyzing games. Here is a typical template for such posts: thread title: "[H]pvz is impossible" thread content: "omg this matchup is driving me nuts how do you win??? I've tried everything but can never win! can you guys watch my replays? should I add more high templars and motherships??? link to replay 1 (replay shows the guy failing DT rush, then gets outmacro'd 2 base vs 5 base) link to replay 2 (replay shows the guy floating 3000 minerals and getting crushed) link to replay 3 (replay shows the guy doing some weird ass build he's clearly never practiced before, gets attacked and dies) link to replay 4 (replay shows the guy failing an unoptimized 4 gate build because he used right click instead of attack move and lost all his units for nothing) (all replays show him QQing about balance instead of saying gg at the end)" I'm sure you've seen many threads like this before. It is apparent upon watching just one of their replays that they didn't watch their own replays even once, didn't look at the how to improve thread, didn't look at Plexa's analyzing replays thread, never looked up their build on liquidpedia, and most likely hasn't touched the strategy forum guidelines. | ||
Chairman Ray
United States11903 Posts
On April 08 2011 11:11 Saracen wrote: [*]If your thread is about a new strategy and you do not have a damn good analysis (with replays) (i.e. I think your thread is too theorycrafty), you can play against me in a BO3 with your strategy. If you lose, you will be BANNED. Time to make a strategy forum topic: [G]99 ways to make your opponent leave the game | ||
whiterabb1t
Belgium681 Posts
On April 08 2011 11:11 Saracen wrote: [*]If your thread is about a new strategy and you do not have a damn good analysis (with replays) (i.e. I think your thread is too theorycrafty), you can play against me in a BO3 with your strategy. If you lose, you will be BANNED. Just out of curiosity... what if I win/roflstomp you? Will you self BAN yourself or something? I agree with this, strats have to be legit and tested and not lazy garbage. | ||
![]()
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
| ||
Resistentialism
Canada688 Posts
![]() | ||
Kar98
Australia924 Posts
![]() | ||
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
On April 08 2011 12:24 whiterabb1t wrote: Just out of curiosity... what if I win/roflstomp you? Will you self BAN yourself or something? I agree with this, strats have to be legit and tested and not lazy garbage. Lol, as awesome that is, we don't want to be encouraging troll posts to get the mods to ban themselves. However, I would support a tourney with mods vs noobs where loser is temp banned for a day. ![]() | ||
Zachatron
United States33 Posts
Edit: I've been watching the forums for about an hour now, and.. crudely put, you guys are really on top of this shit lol. I can't help but laugh when I see a thread pop up and immediately vanish because someone chose to ignore a [!] thread. If only the community would be more mindful and attentive. You gentlemen (and ladies??) really do have your work cut out for you. | ||
| ||