• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:26
CEST 14:26
KST 21:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202550RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support! ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 906 users

"Queuing is Bad" vs. "Keep your Money Low" - Page 11

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 15 Next All
Grebliv
Profile Joined May 2006
Iceland800 Posts
December 16 2010 02:08 GMT
#201
queuing is bad, queuing a tiny bit later on (instead of losing production time) or at calculated moments (as in you won't spend it in the meantime anyways) is fine.

made units + money not low = spend on infrastructure (tech/rax etc.)
ESV Mapmaking!
Tofuicecream
Profile Joined January 2010
United States8 Posts
December 16 2010 02:19 GMT
#202
Queuing units gives you perfect macro for the sacrifice of being able to spend that money sunk on something else. For lower tier players, if they aren't going to spend the money that's "floating" around during say, a big battle, then by all means queue your units. A good practice is to queue only 1-2 units at a time during an engagement, or any other time where your multitasking is being put the the test. If your money gets high, queuing past 2-3 units I would say is definitely bad. If you find your money getting high, that just means you don't have the number of production structures you should. All in all, what I'm trying to say is that queueing a few units helps to maximize the number of things you can do at once.
Stropheum
Profile Joined January 2010
United States1124 Posts
December 16 2010 02:20 GMT
#203
Even if you're not good enough to 100% relinquish queuing, it provides a crutch which inhibits progress.
APM too low? no problem, I've got 3 rounds of unit production taken care of.
If you slowly start working your way away from queuing, you'll find that first of all you'll get the hang of it, and second of all, your hand speed will increase drastically, along with your game sense and build timings.
Seems like a sweet deal to me
KevinIX
Profile Joined October 2009
United States2472 Posts
December 16 2010 02:26 GMT
#204
Queuing is good if you need to spend your apm elsewhere. I think it is perfectly fine to queue up 5 scvs to free up your attention.
Liquid FIGHTING!!!
gangstarr
Profile Joined October 2010
United States68 Posts
December 16 2010 02:55 GMT
#205
[QUOTE]On December 16 2010 02:05 Silmakuoppaanikinko wrote:
[QUOTE]On December 16 2010 02:00 gangstarr wrote:
Essentially, if you have 4 marines queued, you could have made one marine and also built a barracks. There should be no opportunity to queue, and if there is: build another unit producing structure.[/QUOTE]If you have infinite APM to spare maybe. Making a baracks with an SCV requires APM, you have to go back to your base and do that. Queuing up a unit requires less APM. And APM is a resource, you can only do so many things and sometimes microing a battle to come out on top, which can be done simultaneously with queuing, instead of going bac kto your base during that battle, is simply more optimal

While my APM isn't that great, it sits somewhere around 100 without much spam. I am able to micro an army and also build unit producing structures pretty easily. Hotkeys make multitasking rather manageable, but if you are unable to multitask and build structures while producing units and microing an army, then by all means continue to queue. But you just admitted to having bad APM and the inability to play efficiently, hence your need to queue units.

Side note: If your micro suffers while building unit producing structures you will at the very least be able to reproduce the units you lost with the buildings you created.
imbecile
Profile Joined October 2009
563 Posts
December 16 2010 03:07 GMT
#206
On December 16 2010 11:03 Erandorr wrote:
The issue i have with your post is really simple : Of course your oppinion is valued as is everyone elses but your last sentence alone is so fucking stupid(no offence meant). Im not even talking about whether it is right or wrong but just the entitlement to talk in abolutes is really annoying at least to me.


Stop it with that wishy washy. You think I'm wrong, and that's that.

On December 16 2010 11:03 Erandorr wrote:
Okay that is your point of view that could make an interesting discussion : Is it okay do do something wrong while working on something different of your game or do you always need to try playing perfectly because in the long run that may get you better results.


That's exactly the point. Basic macro mechanics and builds can be trained against the computer. If you play on ladder, the first thing you need to learn is to watch your back at any time, because of all those bastards

Now the main argument everyone and you has against queuing is, that in an ideal world you will never have to queue and you will have an optimal economy, and you should aspire to that ideal to become better. In general a good advice, that's why that rule exists. My post was merely to point out, that sometimes you need to make exceptions to that rule, in order to cover other aspects of the game as well. My post was full of caveats, if you have read it.

You make concessions in every aspect of the game:
You lose units in battle, although in an ideal world with perfect control you never would. Yet, in a typical game, the majority of all units will die, even for the winner. No one gets all upset and ranty about this.
You never have perfect information on your opponent, although in a perfect world you would. Yet, in a typical game you always will have to rely in indirect reasoning and guessing. No one seems to be particularly bothered by this.

But when I say, that under certain very narrow circumstances it is ok to queue a little, and that it might help with developing and performing some other aspects of the game, all hell breaks lose.

Of course I was kinda expecting that. Blind rule followers are always so easy to upset. That's why I made that post. A little trolling, and a little making people think and examine the reasons for that rule.

In the end it's all just trade offs. Because battles and skirmishes are happening, because you have to balance the resources and what you need in a game, everyone will inevitably miss a step, because the result of not paying attention to a battle is almost always worse than missing a bit of production. Perfect macro you can have when you play without opponent.

The question now is, how to deal with those excess resources, that inevitably will appear sooner or later (if you are good, later).

One way can be to invest them into exess production ... but that will be idle capacity for most of the game, useless sunken cost. Only helps you to remax fast if you lose a lot and cover up later macro mishaps.

Or you can invest it into attention capacity and force slip-ups and mistakes in in your opponent, make him lose more units, ground building etc. and and miss production, because he has to split his attention, and you don't.
Reptilia
Profile Joined June 2010
Chile913 Posts
December 16 2010 03:33 GMT
#207
The idea is to do both at same time. If you successfully do both, then ur macro is good. Unless you are simply not mining enough.
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources
nttea
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Sweden4353 Posts
December 16 2010 03:42 GMT
#208
So many says it's bad, but barely ANYONE manages to keep their money low and their production running all the time. If you simply want to get better results but not aiming for top diamond it's a good idea to queue units in many situations.
megagoten
Profile Joined October 2010
318 Posts
December 16 2010 03:45 GMT
#209
if you can't micro and macro without queuing.
stop microing and unqueue those units and go spend that extra ressource.
Silmakuoppaanikinko
Profile Joined November 2010
799 Posts
December 16 2010 04:03 GMT
#210
On December 16 2010 10:05 Rodregeus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 17:10 Silmakuoppaanikinko wrote:
I agree, queuing is good. for most players, because it yields you a faster army than not queuing,


Ok I disagree entirely. Queuing won't get a faster army at all. If anything it do the exact opposite. Not this is a fairly extreme example but here is the build order of someone i got matched against last night.

This is 100% what they did. Though, to be fair, it was their placements, and they had clearly never played an RTS before, and had 0 wins in 1's through to 4's :/

Built 2 probes
Assimilator on 8
1 probe in gas
Pylon on 8
Gateway on 8
Queued 5 zealots immediately.

You can't honestly tell me that queueing those zealots was in any way good for this guy. Yeah his build was terrible and he stopped making probes at....8 but if he didn't queue he could have made another gateway and 5 probs. :/
That is pretty much a straw man. It would be like me saying 'Yeah, this guy made one zealot the entire match, if he queued he would have 5'

Of course I didn't mean it like that.

And queuing will get you a faster army than not queuing for most players, because it stops idle time. Let's face it, most people will just get idle time if they don't queue. That's the thing you avoid by queuing.
Workers and town centres are the ultimate counter to turtles.
Erandorr
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
2283 Posts
December 16 2010 09:13 GMT
#211
On December 16 2010 12:07 imbecile wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2010 11:03 Erandorr wrote:
The issue i have with your post is really simple : Of course your oppinion is valued as is everyone elses but your last sentence alone is so fucking stupid(no offence meant). Im not even talking about whether it is right or wrong but just the entitlement to talk in abolutes is really annoying at least to me.


Stop it with that wishy washy. You think I'm wrong, and that's that.

Show nested quote +
On December 16 2010 11:03 Erandorr wrote:
Okay that is your point of view that could make an interesting discussion : Is it okay do do something wrong while working on something different of your game or do you always need to try playing perfectly because in the long run that may get you better results.


That's exactly the point. Basic macro mechanics and builds can be trained against the computer. If you play on ladder, the first thing you need to learn is to watch your back at any time, because of all those bastards

Now the main argument everyone and you has against queuing is, that in an ideal world you will never have to queue and you will have an optimal economy, and you should aspire to that ideal to become better. In general a good advice, that's why that rule exists. My post was merely to point out, that sometimes you need to make exceptions to that rule, in order to cover other aspects of the game as well. My post was full of caveats, if you have read it.

You make concessions in every aspect of the game:
You lose units in battle, although in an ideal world with perfect control you never would. Yet, in a typical game, the majority of all units will die, even for the winner. No one gets all upset and ranty about this.
You never have perfect information on your opponent, although in a perfect world you would. Yet, in a typical game you always will have to rely in indirect reasoning and guessing. No one seems to be particularly bothered by this.

But when I say, that under certain very narrow circumstances it is ok to queue a little, and that it might help with developing and performing some other aspects of the game, all hell breaks lose.

Of course I was kinda expecting that. Blind rule followers are always so easy to upset. That's why I made that post. A little trolling, and a little making people think and examine the reasons for that rule.

In the end it's all just trade offs. Because battles and skirmishes are happening, because you have to balance the resources and what you need in a game, everyone will inevitably miss a step, because the result of not paying attention to a battle is almost always worse than missing a bit of production. Perfect macro you can have when you play without opponent.

The question now is, how to deal with those excess resources, that inevitably will appear sooner or later (if you are good, later).


Okay this sounds far better than what you said in your OP =)
I am absolutly fine with how you formultaed it now but you started a 11 page discussion that could have been easily avoided if you had said what you wrote know instead of at the beginning .
But I for example pride myself for .. well kind of okay macro and i learned that by following these seemingly stupid rules even when it meant losing a game.
I did this because i realized that i honestly should not care too much about a loss when it teaches me more than a win with bad habits might.
But again that for me is a point worth discussing, so why not create a thread with that interesting question instead of " a little trolling" ?
Silmakuoppaanikinko
Profile Joined November 2010
799 Posts
December 16 2010 09:35 GMT
#212
On December 16 2010 18:13 Erandorr wrote:

Okay this sounds far better than what you said in your OP =)
I am absolutly fine with how you formultaed it now but you started a 11 page discussion that could have been easily avoided if you had said what you wrote know instead of at the beginning
I said at the first page 'I think you guys are misreading his point', and many others followed that said the same, enough people understood it that actually read the post rather that stumbling on the sentence 'queuing is good' and then not reading on any more.

I and others have also already explained that while indeed not queuing up and being on top of it is the ideal situation, it's not realistic to expect yourself to be able to do that. What's more, not queuing up is done before being on top of it. So you basically base your decision on the assumption that you're not going to fail or make errors in the future, kind of risky. It's basically walking into battle with the exact number of high templar you need with perfect micro, because any extra high templar is surely a waste of money? But I'd rather have a couple extra because I like to account for my own failures and I know that it's quite possible that I miss a storm.

This is also the reason that I queue, I know that in the future there will be a time that I will make an error. This doesn't mean that I don't try to maintain my probe queue to be at 3 probes (depending on the phase of the game.), but it means that if I don't meet this goal, I have something to fall back on, sure, it cost me 100 minerals which I could have spent on a zealot at that point. But I find playing it safe and having the assurance that my probe production will probably never stop worth more than a single zealot. And in the end it will pay me those 100 minerals back.
Workers and town centres are the ultimate counter to turtles.
anfionn
Profile Joined September 2010
Ireland28 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-16 10:26:05
December 16 2010 10:21 GMT
#213
Im going to jump in, and hopefully not get burnt.

I have many times reviewed replays and said, christ, 3 marauders 2 marines queued, that is a frikking command centre.

and often queueing loses games, in that instead of expanding your production facilities to match your income, you queue, so end up fighting 6 rax off 3 rax (in terms of production capacity)

However, I always queue one extra scv. i.e. 1 building and one queued after, as otherwise I need to skip to my command centre every 17 seconds, exactly.

With that 50 mineral investment, I can have my 25ish scvs at 7 minutes, withoug it I end up with 19.

I mean really am I to skip back to my cc every 17 seconds exactly?
How did I defeat the killbots, simple, I sent wave after wave of my own men
[F_]aths
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Germany3947 Posts
December 16 2010 10:37 GMT
#214
I agree that queuing can help a player to spend the money. It also gives him the opportunity to micro a battle without caring about rebuilding his units fast enough. Of course it's not optimal to use the queue. But for a beginner I think it's worse to pass them. In the end, everyone should decide for himself.
You don't choose to play zerg. The zerg choose you.
gr8ape
Profile Joined July 2008
Canada302 Posts
December 16 2010 13:04 GMT
#215
why is this thread not closed?
GoldenH
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
1115 Posts
December 16 2010 15:08 GMT
#216
I just can't understand this thread... Keeping your money low means not queueing. Queued dudes ARE unspent resources.

If you find yourself queueing, build another building, and don't worry about idle buildings, worry about money. If you're queued it means you couldn't spend all your money fast enough.. so why spend your money even slower? If you have more than 400 resources, why not just throw down a CC, THEN queue up??? I don't worry if my money is high sometimes, I just make sure that I get to 0 resources at some point after 100 food, and that's always a good time to push because my army is as big as it could be at this time, so if my opponent has any stored up money (and he probably does) I have the advantage.

If you actually expand when you attack, like you should, then any extra buildings just would have been built earlier than you needed them, but its okay, because you are at least keeping your money low.
"(Dudes are) not going to say "Buy this game — I cried at the end". (...) I suppose the secret is to find a game that makes you shoot eight million fuckin' dudes and then cry about how awesome it is to shoot eight million fuckin' dudes." - Tim Rogers
Kryptix
Profile Joined August 2010
United States138 Posts
December 16 2010 16:28 GMT
#217
Haven't gotten a chance to play for a few days, but usually by the time I'm on 9-12 rax, I don't mind queuing up 60-70 marines even because I'm not going to realistically go to 20 rax (not sustainable if I want to wall off with buildings they might as well be PFs).

T on 4-5 base has enough income that with any bit of micro, I can't be bothered with more than 15-20 production structures total, and I always prefer to reinforce in almost every situation with marine medivac and tank/hellion after my initial force breaks theirs. This is because 12 rax pumping marines can out reinforce almost anyone and lets me keep pressure up after trading armies. At that point I'd rather micro the marines and just keep them coming rather than worry about whether they could be coming out a couple more at a time...

I know that logically 20 rax would be even better but to keep 20 rax pumping you've already won...
AzurewinD
Profile Joined November 2010
United States569 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-16 18:40:19
December 16 2010 16:58 GMT
#218
IMO follow the Jinro philosophy of getting better. Play the game in the most efficient way possible and learn the proper ins and outs of every aspect of the game early, middle, and late including all of the mechanical elements thereof.

If you get all this nailed down, you might be not be terribly good early on, but it will inevitably pay dividends later on (read: reaching RO4 in GSL).

The reason why people are in the lower leagues is usually BECAUSE of poor macro. Why someone would want to compound the issue by ignoring one of the most important rules of macro improvement in favor of faux satisfaction of another is initially beyond me.

I can see the argument of focusing on one thing at a time. I can get behind that as long as the immediate next step is to put both together in symphony. But if you're playing 50 some odd games with macro via queuing units, you're stepping into bad-habits-becoming-second-nature territory IMO.

But alas, everyone is different. I just prefer the route of doing things right from the beginning even if that means having a few missteps here and there.

Okay this sounds far better than what you said in your OP =)


I'll echo this sentiment. I think people got the wrong impression based on the OP that the argument wasn't being backed up by sufficient reasoning. I'd invite everyone to read your post above on this page to get a 100% better idea of what you're saying.

"...I want more people to be in that state more often, to see things not through the limited and rigid mind or the fearful ego, but through a heart that loves to express and create" - Xiaonan "Glider" Sun
1a2a3aPro
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada227 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-16 17:37:34
December 16 2010 17:30 GMT
#219
The fact that people advocate queuing is a sign that the quality of these forums is going to hell..

Don't queue. I don't care if you're worried about idling structures. If you're queuing to spend your money then you should be adding on more unit producing structures and producing better instead, not hiding your money away and not producing properly.

There is no excuse for queuing. Even a bronze player can go "shit my money's really high" and toss down 4-5 more barracks instead of pressing 5 dadadadadaaaa or something. Just don't do it, it's a terrible habbit.


Small edit: Though I feel you should micro very minimally until your macro is very good (say low diamond), if you DO feel you're going to get involved heavily in a battle add rax/factories and queue a little bit before battle so your money IS being spent, but in the majority of cases, queueing is a big no-no, and even above I don't care how slow your hands are you can press your hotkey and make units. Even here, only queue minimally. For me, it would be making one more set of units around when my units are half done, then going and doing some marine-split or heavy kitting vs banelings, or something similar that's very demanding, but for 95% of the game you should be starting your next unit at 85-90%+ the current units completion, no sooner.
Kryptix
Profile Joined August 2010
United States138 Posts
December 16 2010 17:39 GMT
#220
I'm not advocating queuing, what I was trying to say is that at a certain point in the game, usually around the time you are on 4-5 bases, adding more structures is just unsustainable because there is no way you could fund all of them at once (your first bases will start mining out if not already). At that point I'd rather stay with 15-20 structures that I can support continuously than put even more structures down if those structures are only ever going to be used for 2-3 rounds of production.

Then again having 10 rax go up in one of my thirds or fourths has saved me before when my opponent on less bases thinks he just won a base trade and I come in with 50 marines a couple of minutes later to mop up.
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 3
Serral vs ReynorLIVE!
Maru vs Cure
herO vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
EWC_Arena7379
ComeBackTV 2086
Hui .595
TaKeTV 482
Berry_CruncH308
JimRising 295
3DClanTV 249
Rex207
CranKy Ducklings118
mcanning101
Reynor97
SpeCial63
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena7379
Hui .595
JimRising 295
Rex 207
mcanning 101
Reynor 97
SpeCial 63
ProTech48
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4449
Bisu 2004
Flash 1097
firebathero 1076
EffOrt 868
BeSt 777
Jaedong 707
Mini 358
Stork 345
Hyuk 319
[ Show more ]
Zeus 294
ggaemo 249
Last 239
Soma 190
Pusan 178
Soulkey 164
Mind 162
Snow 130
ZerO 124
Light 116
Hyun 113
ToSsGirL 103
JYJ93
JulyZerg 71
Larva 68
Dewaltoss 65
Sharp 38
sorry 32
soO 31
Sacsri 25
sas.Sziky 20
Movie 18
yabsab 17
scan(afreeca) 15
Icarus 15
ivOry 4
Terrorterran 2
Dota 2
XcaliburYe357
BananaSlamJamma258
420jenkins44
League of Legends
febbydoto15
Counter-Strike
fl0m1688
x6flipin441
sgares154
zeus131
Other Games
singsing2380
B2W.Neo1126
Beastyqt524
crisheroes337
hiko240
Fuzer 185
QueenE31
ArmadaUGS23
ZerO(Twitch)8
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 8830
• WagamamaTV377
League of Legends
• Nemesis844
• Jankos411
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
22h 34m
OSC
1d 1h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 21h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.