• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:50
CEST 21:50
KST 04:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21
Community News
ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo15Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)10[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June4
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted J188 – Nhà Cái Cá Cược Trực Tuyến Đẳng Cấp Châu Á Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes?
Tourneys
GSL CK #4 20-21th June Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 530 One For All The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected
Brood War
General
Battle cruiser feet vs Carrier fleet BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Fact based Zerg Upgrade Tier List vespene.gg — BW replays in browser Data needed
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSLAN 4 is Coming! Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia {D-2} Late to making 20.06.2026 memorable [p]94718
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread [H]Internet/Gaming Cafe Tips and Tricks The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How To Predict Tilt in Espor…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10610 users

[M] (2) SMA Miris Spele

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Normal
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-11 12:21:52
February 11 2016 08:53 GMT
#1
Miris Spele 1.1
(aka "Apotheosis II")

TLMC 7 SECOND PLACE

116x184
Published on all servers


[image loading]

Features:
  • Long, narrow map - expansions progress toward your opponent in the late game
  • 5 very narrow bridges split the map horizontally, restricting movement - with good army positioning, these can be used used to your advantage as choke points
  • Choice of 3rd bases - the standard 3rd is further by ground but safer from attack, and the forward gold 3rd is closer but vulnerable to air harass, and can be offensively separated from your nat by collapsing the rocks


Angled
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Details (outdated)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


Tileset
+ Show Spoiler +
  • Aiur City3
  • Protoss Base6
  • Aiur Temple4
  • Aiur Temple8
  • Aiur Temple2
  • Endion1
  • Haven Grass Rocky


Changelog
+ Show Spoiler +

Version 1.1
-Removed 1 nat entrance, repositioned collapsible rock choke
-Renamed map from "Miris Spele" because Blizz loves censorship and hates fun

Version 1.0:
-Original version
[image loading]
vibeo gane,
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
February 11 2016 10:35 GMT
#2
I don't understand the idea behind purple river, it's okay if it was lava or frozen river in a nature-summer world, but this? The mat itself is already nice, imo not need to add anything exotic to make it unique. It's already good without that purple river
Antares777
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1971 Posts
February 11 2016 15:41 GMT
#3
Though the main nat set up is different, it reminds me of Destination, even if it's just because of its shape. We haven't really seen long maps that much, but hopefully we will see more of them in the future.

I love the two entrance natural. It works especially well on the map because of its length, making the rush distances extra long. Late game expansion towards your opponent is also something that we haven't really seen that much of either. I'm not sure how that will go though. Many people have opted to use gold expansions to be creative, but you've found a way to do it without a single gold expansion. I love the narrow bridges in the center as well, they force people to think twice about engagements and which path they should use.

As a Zerg player, I also take comfort in knowing that if my opponent blocks my natural, I'll have plenty of other options to choose from.

If the purple river is a problem, maybe decrease its brightness/contrast. It does look a little out of place.
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
February 11 2016 16:13 GMT
#4
Dont listen to the purple haters. I like purple. It makes a very nice contrast with the green and yellow.
InfCereal
Profile Joined December 2011
Canada1759 Posts
February 11 2016 17:26 GMT
#5
I too enjoy the purple
Cereal
sTYleZerG-eX
Profile Joined January 2010
Mexico473 Posts
February 11 2016 18:21 GMT
#6
WOW wow WoW I love it! Fantastic work! (very nice title set)
10%
FrostPilot
Profile Joined August 2015
31 Posts
April 06 2016 20:10 GMT
#7
We played this map several times - and like it. Thanks!
Superouman
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
France2195 Posts
April 06 2016 21:56 GMT
#8
god-tier map here
Search "[SO]" on B.net to find all my maps ||| Cloud Kingdom / Turbo Cruise '84 / Bone Temple / Eternal Empire / Zen / Purity and Industry / Golden Wall / Fortitude / Beckett Industries / Waterfall
SwedenTheKid
Profile Joined July 2014
567 Posts
April 06 2016 23:25 GMT
#9
Beautiful aesthetics, and I really like the natural setup and the map bounds.
Casual Mapmaker
Quidios
Profile Joined June 2013
Sweden74 Posts
April 06 2016 23:52 GMT
#10
Good effort on the pathing and terrain. You really squeezed in all those expansions tho, I don't think that many are needed. But each to their own I guess.
FrostPilot
Profile Joined August 2015
31 Posts
April 07 2016 11:32 GMT
#11
On April 07 2016 08:52 Quidios wrote:
You really squeezed in all those expansions tho, I don't think that many are needed. But each to their own I guess.

These expansion provide some kind of variation - and in LotV, can there be too many expansions?

For me this map has a very nice flow - a main with enough room to build our production, a natural, which requires some defense, different possibilities to expand further, each expansion with it's own vulnerabilty ... it just feels like a RTS should be, strategy first.
Blizzkrieg
Profile Joined March 2014
95 Posts
April 09 2016 05:25 GMT
#12
On February 12 2016 03:21 sTYleZerG-eX wrote:
WOW wow WoW I love it! Fantastic work! (very nice title set)


On April 07 2016 06:56 Superouman wrote:
god-tier map here


I need no other words.

Man is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges and the infinity in which he is engulfed. -Blaise Pascal
phantomfive
Profile Joined April 2010
Korea (South)404 Posts
April 09 2016 16:53 GMT
#13
The choke points are brutal. Tough to get an army across.
To ease another's heartache is to forget one's own - Lincoln
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52798 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-04-09 18:44:57
April 09 2016 18:44 GMT
#14
On April 10 2016 01:53 phantomfive wrote:
The choke points are brutal. Tough to get an army across.

IIRC, that's a pretty big point in a lot of -NegativeZero-'s maps, and it isn't a bad thing.
ModeratorI am still alive, somehow
TL+ Member
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-04-09 21:35:08
April 09 2016 21:33 GMT
#15
thanks everyone. the brutal chokepoints are 100% intentional, it's supposed to be difficult to cross from the left to the right side of the map or vice versa - you have to be certain that your units will not be intercepted by the opponent's army as you traverse one of the bridges.

i added a small update, there's a destructible rock at the larger nat entrance now. this means that with proper building placement, you can now wall the nat with the fairly standard building count of 2 gates and 2 pylons (but at the cost of not being able to use the collapsible towers). at the same time i fixed a small texturing mistake.

not going to bother updating the pictures in the OP, it's the exact same map but with a rock added here:

[image loading]
vibeo gane,
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
April 10 2016 02:21 GMT
#16
On April 10 2016 06:33 -NegativeZero- wrote:
thanks everyone. the brutal chokepoints are 100% intentional, it's supposed to be difficult to cross from the left to the right side of the map or vice versa - you have to be certain that your units will not be intercepted by the opponent's army as you traverse one of the bridges.

i added a small update, there's a destructible rock at the larger nat entrance now. this means that with proper building placement, you can now wall the nat with the fairly standard building count of 2 gates and 2 pylons (but at the cost of not being able to use the collapsible towers). at the same time i fixed a small texturing mistake.

not going to bother updating the pictures in the OP, it's the exact same map but with a rock added here:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]



I really like this map, but, get rid of those rocks. All of them. I don't even think the destructible rock tower should be there. Maybe replace the rock tower with regular rocks if anything.

Protoss does not need to be able to FFE anymore, as gateway expands and pylon overcharge allow for more open and multi entrance naturals, as long as they aren't stupidly open like Lerilak Crest. With multi entrance nats, if the attacker has a much harder/longer time going between the multiple entrances than the defender, it's fine. If anything, it forces the attacker to split up their forces, and gives the chance for Protoss to weaken the attacker if an entrance is FF'd or zoned off with pylon overcharge. So yeah, embrace the multi-entrance natural. It would work really well on this map with the whole left vs right thing.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
April 10 2016 04:03 GMT
#17
errr arent the 2 rock towers the only rocks on the map? Or am I missing some somehow
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
April 10 2016 04:15 GMT
#18
On April 10 2016 13:03 Fatam wrote:
errr arent the 2 rock towers the only rocks on the map? Or am I missing some somehow


In the picture posted by -NegativeZero- three posts above there are rocks at the other entrance to the natural.
Uvantak
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Uruguay1381 Posts
April 10 2016 05:41 GMT
#19
On April 10 2016 11:21 Timetwister22 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2016 06:33 -NegativeZero- wrote:
thanks everyone. the brutal chokepoints are 100% intentional, it's supposed to be difficult to cross from the left to the right side of the map or vice versa - you have to be certain that your units will not be intercepted by the opponent's army as you traverse one of the bridges.

i added a small update, there's a destructible rock at the larger nat entrance now. this means that with proper building placement, you can now wall the nat with the fairly standard building count of 2 gates and 2 pylons (but at the cost of not being able to use the collapsible towers). at the same time i fixed a small texturing mistake.

not going to bother updating the pictures in the OP, it's the exact same map but with a rock added here:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]



I really like this map, but, get rid of those rocks. All of them. I don't even think the destructible rock tower should be there. Maybe replace the rock tower with regular rocks if anything.

Protoss does not need to be able to FFE anymore, as gateway expands and pylon overcharge allow for more open and multi entrance naturals, as long as they aren't stupidly open like Lerilak Crest. With multi entrance nats, if the attacker has a much harder/longer time going between the multiple entrances than the defender, it's fine. If anything, it forces the attacker to split up their forces, and gives the chance for Protoss to weaken the attacker if an entrance is FF'd or zoned off with pylon overcharge. So yeah, embrace the multi-entrance natural. It would work really well on this map with the whole left vs right thing.

Even when I do agree that it might work without the rocks, I can't avoid but be worried at the ramp leading down the main base, atm it is just way too prone to runbys, specially because in the perimeter of the main base, slightly forward to the entrance there is no anchor which could allow Toss, Terran or Z to help themselves build a wall from the edge of the terrain to the Town Hall.

Imo? The Main base ramps needs to be rotated 90º counter clockwise, or be pushed back quite a bit ala CloudKingdom (Rotate Nat bases 45º for them to fit the new ramps). But my main gripe with this is that even when it will make the map quite solid, it will break the nice main base symmetry you have going.

Can't post pictures atm, but I'm sure you will understand what I mean, but if you don't, here's a pic of what I mean by anchor. That small doodad clump of pipes, allows players to set up a walloff point, where units wont slip by.
@Kantuva | Mapmaker | KTVMaps.wordpress.com | Check my profile to see my TL map threads, and you can search for KTV in the Custom Games section to play them.
Avexyli
Profile Blog Joined April 2014
United States711 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-04-10 06:00:13
April 10 2016 05:58 GMT
#20
I'm not an expert, but everyone I've talked to personally loves this map but really dislikes the double natural choke and the forward third. It's annoying for all three races (according to PiG, two entrance naturals are really irritating, and of course P has trouble walling etc as addressed in the update pic)

Getting rid of the rocks would also create a runby issue as KTV suggested. I would say that his solution is quite good, as it creates a defensive ramp that goes right into the natural. But my main concern is that forward "third" base. It's way too open and you'll probably rarely see anyone take it.

Personally, these are the changes I'd make (they're pretty extreme though, so bear with me)

[image loading]

Take the highground wall and move it towards the main, eliminating the 2 entrances, meaning you have a 45 degree choke out towards the large ramp. There is also a smaller choke towards the forward third, but it all goes into the same natural choke. Now, because the third is so open, there's really just a risk to take it with no reward. Making it a gold would give Zergs a nice close gold base, but it's punishable.
Remove the 2 bridges closest to each base, expand the middle one. The third is still way too abusable for even any consideration for it to be taken in matchups like TvZ where tanks can just slap it forever. Removing the farthest bridges extends the rush distance, not perfecting the defense, but definitely making it easier and more comfortable to take as a third base.

It also creates a more defined middle, in my opinion. Center of the map for combat. Maybe a tower would fit in this new expanded bridge, but it's ultimately your map and up to you. It's a lovely map.
AVEX - Multi Winner, Finalist, Judge of the TeamLiquid Map Contests, Former SC:EVO Enviroment Artist & Multiplayer Game Design
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-22 10:08:30
May 22 2016 10:06 GMT
#21
Updated to version 1.1, as it currently appears in the TLMC 7 finals. Nat was changed to have 1 entrance instead of 2, with the entrance leading to the gold instead changed to a secondary choke outside the nat. Credit to Avexyli for a couple of the ideas behind the implementation of this.

If you're confused about the name change in TLMC, well, let's just say the folks at blizz and TL didn't really take kindly to a map named "dead game" in latvian lol
vibeo gane,
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
May 22 2016 16:33 GMT
#22
Did you tell them what the name meant? Or did they notice by themselves?
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
May 22 2016 16:59 GMT
#23
oh that's what it meant. Ha. You troll :-P
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Avexyli
Profile Blog Joined April 2014
United States711 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-22 18:00:38
May 22 2016 18:00 GMT
#24
Yeah the TLMC version is much much better. Personally I think the highground blue third base is a little boring though.
AVEX - Multi Winner, Finalist, Judge of the TeamLiquid Map Contests, Former SC:EVO Enviroment Artist & Multiplayer Game Design
Namrufus
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States396 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-22 19:30:06
May 22 2016 19:10 GMT
#25
I don't have anything constructive to say except "good luck!". I think that this is my favorite map in the macro catagory.
This is it... the alpaca lips.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-05-23 02:14:12
May 22 2016 20:40 GMT
#26
On May 23 2016 01:33 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Did you tell them what the name meant? Or did they notice by themselves?

i told a skype chat full of mapmakers, it mysteriously leaked out from there

edit: here's a picture of the new nat choke - it looks wide at first glance but can be walled with a standard number of buildings:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
vibeo gane,
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
19:00
Group Stage - Day 3
XuanXuan vs Jaystar
Mihu vs Messiah
eOnzErG vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs Jaystar
TerrOr vs Messiah
XuanXuan vs Mihu
eOnzErG vs Jaystar
ZZZero.O193
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ByuN 669
BRAT_OK 69
Nathanias 45
Ketroc 36
MindelVK 33
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 15262
ggaemo 220
ZZZero.O 193
firebathero 142
Rock 17
League of Legends
Trikslyr61
Counter-Strike
fl0m11720
tarik_tv9188
summit1g8000
byalli644
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor258
Other Games
Grubby3665
FrodaN1275
PiGStarcraft300
DeMusliM119
minikerr7
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1164
EGCTV1118
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 65
• Hupsaiya 55
• musti20045 22
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 9
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Counter-Strike
• C_a_k_e 2199
• Shiphtur120
Other Games
• imaqtpie788
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 10m
WardiTV Spring Champion…
15h 10m
GSL
16h 10m
IPSL
20h 10m
Hawk vs Julia
Patches Events
21h 10m
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
23h 10m
Dewalt vs Messiah
Bonyth vs Mihu
TerrOr vs XuanXuan
eOnzErG vs Messiah
Jaystar vs Mihu
Dewalt vs XuanXuan
Bonyth vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
1d 4h
WardiTV Weekly
1d 15h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 20h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
Douyu Cup 2020
4 days
Oliveira vs Trap
Jieshi vs XY
soO vs FanTaSy
TY vs Coffee
Douyu Cup 2020
5 days
Neeb vs Impact
MacSed vs Cyan
Scarlett vs Kelazhur
INnoVation vs Dear
Douyu Cup 2020
6 days
Maestros of the Game
6 days
herO vs Classic
Maru vs Serral
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-19
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Heroes Pulsing #2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 1
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Light HT
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.