• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:31
CEST 08:31
KST 15:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7
Community News
Flash Announces Retirement From ASL8Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
CONSULT ALPHA SPY NEST EXPERTS FOR YOUR LOST BTC Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) WardiTV Mondays SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 $200 Biweekly - StarCraft Evolution League #1
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Retirement From ASL ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 482 users

[I] Proper Mineral Placement - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-12 07:03:49
December 12 2012 06:58 GMT
#41
Yeah I catch myself obsessing about that sometimes. lol

As far as mineral and geyser placement goes, I have been favoring gases being next to each other much more often lately.
Below is my favorite, as you have the geysers in the least diagonal positions possible (without doing something really weird), which is actually a lot more important than if the minerals are perfect (although the minerals are fine here too) b/c if gas efficiency is affected (when you have geysers that are directly diagonal from the town hall) then you're losing a somewhat significant % of your gas income, compared to if there's a slight mineral inefficiency.. you would only be losing a tiny tiny % of your mineral income.

[image loading]

Besides that, I think gases being next to each other is a tad less annoying on the player (it's slightly easier/faster to command your worker(s) to build 2 geysers when they are next to each other), which is nice.

The other important thing that I don't think has been mentioned: You have to consider if your mineral formation allows units to get through the mineral line (important for defending banshee harass, hellions, or drops).
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 12 2012 07:04 GMT
#42
It's also important for blocking cheesy stuff like cannon wall-ins or bunkers. Daybreak has that problem at the natural which was fixed with random no-build squares that have zero correlation with what the ground looks like. Avoid this.

I like having geysers that way too. Maybe one day we'll have BW style base layouts with gas almost always the same layout, in order to deal with the gas footprint problem.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 14:40:55
December 13 2012 14:39 GMT
#43
Is the gas footprint problem really that big of a deal, the income difference is pretty negligible isn't it?

What I really don't get is why the game doesn't have rotatable minerals to be honest. For a 2 by 1 footprint, there is no reason not to make them able to rotate.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Orek
Profile Joined February 2012
1665 Posts
December 13 2012 15:45 GMT
#44
Nice. Very interesting and ambitious thread.
As for gas location consideration, my [G] ~8% faster gas mining thread should help.

While doing this gas research, I thought of doing a similar research on mineral as well, but I gave up the idea due to sheer number of possible mineral patch locations. (probably a few hundred in total) I doubt anyone has passion & time to do similar mineral line research, so we are bound to conclude that the difference should be negligible when in fact it could be as big as 2~3%. Gas inefficiency turned out to be 4% maximum for 2 geysers at a base {(8+0)/2=4%}, so my wild guess based solely on my hunch is that mineral line inefficiency for 8 mineral patches is probably about 1% among any decent mineral line layout standard or not, but we'll never know without a comprehensive research. Personally, I have hard time calling 1% negligible even if that were the case, though. A fair RTS game design should aim at 0% IMO.
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 16:15:56
December 13 2012 16:15 GMT
#45
Is the gas footprint problem really that big of a deal, the income difference is pretty negligible isn't it?


The reason it's slightly more of a big deal than mineral placement is you have 2 geysers vs. 8 patches. If 1 or 2 of the patches are slightly inefficient, vs. 1 geyser, then that's 12.5 - 25% of your mineral patches that require an extra worker, vs. 50% of your gas geysers requiring an extra worker. While it's not quite that simple, since a bad geyser and a bad mineral patch may not be operating at the exact same level of inefficiency, the basic math is obvious enough.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
December 13 2012 16:20 GMT
#46
On December 14 2012 00:45 Orek wrote:so my wild guess based solely on my hunch is that mineral line inefficiency for 8 mineral patches is probably about 1% among any decent mineral line layout standard or not, but we'll never know without a comprehensive research. Personally, I have hard time calling 1% negligible even if that were the case, though. A fair RTS game design should aim at 0% IMO.


I agree, In a game that's this competitive they really should make sure silly anomalies (however small) like this are weeded out.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
December 13 2012 18:20 GMT
#47
I think the most important thing is that it's positionally balanced. If one map has a slightly different income from another that's really fine, so long as it's the same for both sides on every map.

For some mineral layouts and symmetry types, it would be nice to be able to rotate minerals, though. And having geysers with symmetrical footprints would be nice, as well.
all's fair in love and melodies
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 13 2012 19:34 GMT
#48
In fact, I like oddities that produce minor asymmetries, as long as they don't create demonstrable imbalance. While rotating 2x1 patches would make for precise symmetry, most of the time you can create equivalent or nearly-equivalent formations (think of tetris pieces) to the point where it doesn't change balance, which would only be positionally in mirror matchups anyway. Not sure why I like the idea of minor differences but something about it appeals to me, kind of like in sports how one team gets to randomly choose a side of the field to have.

The gas thing should be fixed, though. Otherwise we have to use only east and west gas placements, and in certain situations like ling/bling wars, it's definitely impactful to have 8% faster gas mining.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
December 13 2012 19:41 GMT
#49
On December 14 2012 04:34 EatThePath wrote:
In fact, I like oddities that produce minor asymmetries, as long as they don't create demonstrable imbalance. While rotating 2x1 patches would make for precise symmetry, most of the time you can create equivalent or nearly-equivalent formations (think of tetris pieces) to the point where it doesn't change balance, which would only be positionally in mirror matchups anyway. Not sure why I like the idea of minor differences but something about it appeals to me, kind of like in sports how one team gets to randomly choose a side of the field to have.

The gas thing should be fixed, though. Otherwise we have to use only east and west gas placements, and in certain situations like ling/bling wars, it's definitely impactful to have 8% faster gas mining.
8% is the worst ever case though, no one positions geysers in a way that you need 4 workers on it.

That said, being able to rotate patches really doesn't hurt in any way so why not put it in the game?
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 13 2012 20:01 GMT
#50
Like I said, something appeals to me about it. Connection to the first game? To put it into words would be to put it into way too many words. The gas thing just seems like a silly oversight in footprint creation. Maybe I am being arbitrary.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
December 14 2012 00:01 GMT
#51
8% is the worst ever case though, no one positions geysers in a way that you need 4 workers on it.


Well that's not true. If you look at the post, most of the ladder maps have at least 1 important geyser (geysers in either the main or nat) that are positioned that way.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
HoLe
Profile Joined August 2012
Canada183 Posts
January 30 2013 19:36 GMT
#52
I just started making maps, this thread had been super helpful.

Can anybody tell me how to copy paste a mineral template in the editor?
Ideally I'd like to get a perfect template for each possible position on a map because right now I'm doing it all by hand and it sucks a rat.
Terran.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
January 30 2013 19:55 GMT
#53
--- Nuked ---
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
February 19 2013 23:19 GMT
#54
I guess it's important now to make sure that the workers don't get too messed up when auto-splitting in the mains.

+ Show Spoiler [side] +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler [top] +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler [corner] +
[image loading]


Here I've shown some of the ones I tested. Some of them end up with workers going behind the minerals and some don't.

I only tested formations which allowed for 3-worker geysers... I think any of these formations would be fine in a non-main position.
all's fair in love and melodies
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 29m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
trigger 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 20560
Noble 28
Aegong 23
ajuk12(nOOB) 16
Bale 6
League of Legends
JimRising 676
Counter-Strike
summit1g7294
Stewie2K795
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King155
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor112
Other Games
shahzam699
WinterStarcraft391
SortOf12
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick896
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 72
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2103
League of Legends
• Lourlo984
• masondota2480
• Stunt404
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
9h 29m
Replay Cast
17h 29m
The PondCast
1d 3h
RSL Revival
1d 3h
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
2 days
FEL
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL: ProLeague
4 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.