• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:42
CEST 06:42
KST 13:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence5Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups3WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Diplomacy, Cosmonarchy Edition [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! Is there English video for group selection for ASL
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1369 users

[I] Proper Mineral Placement - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-12 07:03:49
December 12 2012 06:58 GMT
#41
Yeah I catch myself obsessing about that sometimes. lol

As far as mineral and geyser placement goes, I have been favoring gases being next to each other much more often lately.
Below is my favorite, as you have the geysers in the least diagonal positions possible (without doing something really weird), which is actually a lot more important than if the minerals are perfect (although the minerals are fine here too) b/c if gas efficiency is affected (when you have geysers that are directly diagonal from the town hall) then you're losing a somewhat significant % of your gas income, compared to if there's a slight mineral inefficiency.. you would only be losing a tiny tiny % of your mineral income.

[image loading]

Besides that, I think gases being next to each other is a tad less annoying on the player (it's slightly easier/faster to command your worker(s) to build 2 geysers when they are next to each other), which is nice.

The other important thing that I don't think has been mentioned: You have to consider if your mineral formation allows units to get through the mineral line (important for defending banshee harass, hellions, or drops).
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 12 2012 07:04 GMT
#42
It's also important for blocking cheesy stuff like cannon wall-ins or bunkers. Daybreak has that problem at the natural which was fixed with random no-build squares that have zero correlation with what the ground looks like. Avoid this.

I like having geysers that way too. Maybe one day we'll have BW style base layouts with gas almost always the same layout, in order to deal with the gas footprint problem.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 14:40:55
December 13 2012 14:39 GMT
#43
Is the gas footprint problem really that big of a deal, the income difference is pretty negligible isn't it?

What I really don't get is why the game doesn't have rotatable minerals to be honest. For a 2 by 1 footprint, there is no reason not to make them able to rotate.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Orek
Profile Joined February 2012
1665 Posts
December 13 2012 15:45 GMT
#44
Nice. Very interesting and ambitious thread.
As for gas location consideration, my [G] ~8% faster gas mining thread should help.

While doing this gas research, I thought of doing a similar research on mineral as well, but I gave up the idea due to sheer number of possible mineral patch locations. (probably a few hundred in total) I doubt anyone has passion & time to do similar mineral line research, so we are bound to conclude that the difference should be negligible when in fact it could be as big as 2~3%. Gas inefficiency turned out to be 4% maximum for 2 geysers at a base {(8+0)/2=4%}, so my wild guess based solely on my hunch is that mineral line inefficiency for 8 mineral patches is probably about 1% among any decent mineral line layout standard or not, but we'll never know without a comprehensive research. Personally, I have hard time calling 1% negligible even if that were the case, though. A fair RTS game design should aim at 0% IMO.
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 16:15:56
December 13 2012 16:15 GMT
#45
Is the gas footprint problem really that big of a deal, the income difference is pretty negligible isn't it?


The reason it's slightly more of a big deal than mineral placement is you have 2 geysers vs. 8 patches. If 1 or 2 of the patches are slightly inefficient, vs. 1 geyser, then that's 12.5 - 25% of your mineral patches that require an extra worker, vs. 50% of your gas geysers requiring an extra worker. While it's not quite that simple, since a bad geyser and a bad mineral patch may not be operating at the exact same level of inefficiency, the basic math is obvious enough.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
December 13 2012 16:20 GMT
#46
On December 14 2012 00:45 Orek wrote:so my wild guess based solely on my hunch is that mineral line inefficiency for 8 mineral patches is probably about 1% among any decent mineral line layout standard or not, but we'll never know without a comprehensive research. Personally, I have hard time calling 1% negligible even if that were the case, though. A fair RTS game design should aim at 0% IMO.


I agree, In a game that's this competitive they really should make sure silly anomalies (however small) like this are weeded out.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
December 13 2012 18:20 GMT
#47
I think the most important thing is that it's positionally balanced. If one map has a slightly different income from another that's really fine, so long as it's the same for both sides on every map.

For some mineral layouts and symmetry types, it would be nice to be able to rotate minerals, though. And having geysers with symmetrical footprints would be nice, as well.
all's fair in love and melodies
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 13 2012 19:34 GMT
#48
In fact, I like oddities that produce minor asymmetries, as long as they don't create demonstrable imbalance. While rotating 2x1 patches would make for precise symmetry, most of the time you can create equivalent or nearly-equivalent formations (think of tetris pieces) to the point where it doesn't change balance, which would only be positionally in mirror matchups anyway. Not sure why I like the idea of minor differences but something about it appeals to me, kind of like in sports how one team gets to randomly choose a side of the field to have.

The gas thing should be fixed, though. Otherwise we have to use only east and west gas placements, and in certain situations like ling/bling wars, it's definitely impactful to have 8% faster gas mining.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
December 13 2012 19:41 GMT
#49
On December 14 2012 04:34 EatThePath wrote:
In fact, I like oddities that produce minor asymmetries, as long as they don't create demonstrable imbalance. While rotating 2x1 patches would make for precise symmetry, most of the time you can create equivalent or nearly-equivalent formations (think of tetris pieces) to the point where it doesn't change balance, which would only be positionally in mirror matchups anyway. Not sure why I like the idea of minor differences but something about it appeals to me, kind of like in sports how one team gets to randomly choose a side of the field to have.

The gas thing should be fixed, though. Otherwise we have to use only east and west gas placements, and in certain situations like ling/bling wars, it's definitely impactful to have 8% faster gas mining.
8% is the worst ever case though, no one positions geysers in a way that you need 4 workers on it.

That said, being able to rotate patches really doesn't hurt in any way so why not put it in the game?
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 13 2012 20:01 GMT
#50
Like I said, something appeals to me about it. Connection to the first game? To put it into words would be to put it into way too many words. The gas thing just seems like a silly oversight in footprint creation. Maybe I am being arbitrary.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
December 14 2012 00:01 GMT
#51
8% is the worst ever case though, no one positions geysers in a way that you need 4 workers on it.


Well that's not true. If you look at the post, most of the ladder maps have at least 1 important geyser (geysers in either the main or nat) that are positioned that way.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
HoLe
Profile Joined August 2012
Canada183 Posts
January 30 2013 19:36 GMT
#52
I just started making maps, this thread had been super helpful.

Can anybody tell me how to copy paste a mineral template in the editor?
Ideally I'd like to get a perfect template for each possible position on a map because right now I'm doing it all by hand and it sucks a rat.
Terran.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
January 30 2013 19:55 GMT
#53
--- Nuked ---
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
February 19 2013 23:19 GMT
#54
I guess it's important now to make sure that the workers don't get too messed up when auto-splitting in the mains.

+ Show Spoiler [side] +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler [top] +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler [corner] +
[image loading]


Here I've shown some of the ones I tested. Some of them end up with workers going behind the minerals and some don't.

I only tested formations which allowed for 3-worker geysers... I think any of these formations would be fine in a non-main position.
all's fair in love and melodies
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
Mid Season Playoffs #2
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ROOTCatZ 61
StarCraft: Brood War
soO 95
Noble 57
JulyZerg 34
ajuk12(nOOB) 23
sSak 19
Bale 11
Icarus 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever414
NeuroSwarm128
League of Legends
JimRising 637
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K682
semphis_31
Other Games
summit1g5856
shahzam834
C9.Mang0355
Maynarde114
SortOf99
Trikslyr40
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick874
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1398
• Lourlo919
• Stunt288
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5h 18m
Afreeca Starleague
5h 18m
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
2v2
6h 18m
OSC
8h 18m
PiGosaur Monday
19h 18m
LiuLi Cup
1d 6h
RSL Revival
2 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Online Event
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.