• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:09
CEST 03:09
KST 10:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview5[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris42Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195
StarCraft 2
General
2024/25 Off-Season Roster Moves #2: Serral - Greatest Players of All Time #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) Kirktown Chat Brawl #8 - 4.6K max Tonight LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies
Brood War
General
Starcraft at lower levels TvP Post ASL20 Ro24 discussion. BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Easiest luckies way to get out of Asl groups BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro24 Group F [IPSL] CSLAN Review and CSLPRO Reimagined! Small VOD Thread 2.0 Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne General RTS Discussion Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
How Culture and Conflict Imp…
TrAiDoS
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 521 users

[I] Proper Mineral Placement - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-12 07:03:49
December 12 2012 06:58 GMT
#41
Yeah I catch myself obsessing about that sometimes. lol

As far as mineral and geyser placement goes, I have been favoring gases being next to each other much more often lately.
Below is my favorite, as you have the geysers in the least diagonal positions possible (without doing something really weird), which is actually a lot more important than if the minerals are perfect (although the minerals are fine here too) b/c if gas efficiency is affected (when you have geysers that are directly diagonal from the town hall) then you're losing a somewhat significant % of your gas income, compared to if there's a slight mineral inefficiency.. you would only be losing a tiny tiny % of your mineral income.

[image loading]

Besides that, I think gases being next to each other is a tad less annoying on the player (it's slightly easier/faster to command your worker(s) to build 2 geysers when they are next to each other), which is nice.

The other important thing that I don't think has been mentioned: You have to consider if your mineral formation allows units to get through the mineral line (important for defending banshee harass, hellions, or drops).
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 12 2012 07:04 GMT
#42
It's also important for blocking cheesy stuff like cannon wall-ins or bunkers. Daybreak has that problem at the natural which was fixed with random no-build squares that have zero correlation with what the ground looks like. Avoid this.

I like having geysers that way too. Maybe one day we'll have BW style base layouts with gas almost always the same layout, in order to deal with the gas footprint problem.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 14:40:55
December 13 2012 14:39 GMT
#43
Is the gas footprint problem really that big of a deal, the income difference is pretty negligible isn't it?

What I really don't get is why the game doesn't have rotatable minerals to be honest. For a 2 by 1 footprint, there is no reason not to make them able to rotate.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Orek
Profile Joined February 2012
1665 Posts
December 13 2012 15:45 GMT
#44
Nice. Very interesting and ambitious thread.
As for gas location consideration, my [G] ~8% faster gas mining thread should help.

While doing this gas research, I thought of doing a similar research on mineral as well, but I gave up the idea due to sheer number of possible mineral patch locations. (probably a few hundred in total) I doubt anyone has passion & time to do similar mineral line research, so we are bound to conclude that the difference should be negligible when in fact it could be as big as 2~3%. Gas inefficiency turned out to be 4% maximum for 2 geysers at a base {(8+0)/2=4%}, so my wild guess based solely on my hunch is that mineral line inefficiency for 8 mineral patches is probably about 1% among any decent mineral line layout standard or not, but we'll never know without a comprehensive research. Personally, I have hard time calling 1% negligible even if that were the case, though. A fair RTS game design should aim at 0% IMO.
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 16:15:56
December 13 2012 16:15 GMT
#45
Is the gas footprint problem really that big of a deal, the income difference is pretty negligible isn't it?


The reason it's slightly more of a big deal than mineral placement is you have 2 geysers vs. 8 patches. If 1 or 2 of the patches are slightly inefficient, vs. 1 geyser, then that's 12.5 - 25% of your mineral patches that require an extra worker, vs. 50% of your gas geysers requiring an extra worker. While it's not quite that simple, since a bad geyser and a bad mineral patch may not be operating at the exact same level of inefficiency, the basic math is obvious enough.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
December 13 2012 16:20 GMT
#46
On December 14 2012 00:45 Orek wrote:so my wild guess based solely on my hunch is that mineral line inefficiency for 8 mineral patches is probably about 1% among any decent mineral line layout standard or not, but we'll never know without a comprehensive research. Personally, I have hard time calling 1% negligible even if that were the case, though. A fair RTS game design should aim at 0% IMO.


I agree, In a game that's this competitive they really should make sure silly anomalies (however small) like this are weeded out.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
December 13 2012 18:20 GMT
#47
I think the most important thing is that it's positionally balanced. If one map has a slightly different income from another that's really fine, so long as it's the same for both sides on every map.

For some mineral layouts and symmetry types, it would be nice to be able to rotate minerals, though. And having geysers with symmetrical footprints would be nice, as well.
all's fair in love and melodies
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 13 2012 19:34 GMT
#48
In fact, I like oddities that produce minor asymmetries, as long as they don't create demonstrable imbalance. While rotating 2x1 patches would make for precise symmetry, most of the time you can create equivalent or nearly-equivalent formations (think of tetris pieces) to the point where it doesn't change balance, which would only be positionally in mirror matchups anyway. Not sure why I like the idea of minor differences but something about it appeals to me, kind of like in sports how one team gets to randomly choose a side of the field to have.

The gas thing should be fixed, though. Otherwise we have to use only east and west gas placements, and in certain situations like ling/bling wars, it's definitely impactful to have 8% faster gas mining.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
December 13 2012 19:41 GMT
#49
On December 14 2012 04:34 EatThePath wrote:
In fact, I like oddities that produce minor asymmetries, as long as they don't create demonstrable imbalance. While rotating 2x1 patches would make for precise symmetry, most of the time you can create equivalent or nearly-equivalent formations (think of tetris pieces) to the point where it doesn't change balance, which would only be positionally in mirror matchups anyway. Not sure why I like the idea of minor differences but something about it appeals to me, kind of like in sports how one team gets to randomly choose a side of the field to have.

The gas thing should be fixed, though. Otherwise we have to use only east and west gas placements, and in certain situations like ling/bling wars, it's definitely impactful to have 8% faster gas mining.
8% is the worst ever case though, no one positions geysers in a way that you need 4 workers on it.

That said, being able to rotate patches really doesn't hurt in any way so why not put it in the game?
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
December 13 2012 20:01 GMT
#50
Like I said, something appeals to me about it. Connection to the first game? To put it into words would be to put it into way too many words. The gas thing just seems like a silly oversight in footprint creation. Maybe I am being arbitrary.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
December 14 2012 00:01 GMT
#51
8% is the worst ever case though, no one positions geysers in a way that you need 4 workers on it.


Well that's not true. If you look at the post, most of the ladder maps have at least 1 important geyser (geysers in either the main or nat) that are positioned that way.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
HoLe
Profile Joined August 2012
Canada183 Posts
January 30 2013 19:36 GMT
#52
I just started making maps, this thread had been super helpful.

Can anybody tell me how to copy paste a mineral template in the editor?
Ideally I'd like to get a perfect template for each possible position on a map because right now I'm doing it all by hand and it sucks a rat.
Terran.
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
January 30 2013 19:55 GMT
#53
--- Nuked ---
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
February 19 2013 23:19 GMT
#54
I guess it's important now to make sure that the workers don't get too messed up when auto-splitting in the mains.

+ Show Spoiler [side] +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler [top] +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler [corner] +
[image loading]


Here I've shown some of the ones I tested. Some of them end up with workers going behind the minerals and some don't.

I only tested formations which allowed for 3-worker geysers... I think any of these formations would be fine in a non-main position.
all's fair in love and melodies
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 52m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft381
Nina 144
WinterStarcraft89
ProTech78
RuFF_SC2 28
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 843
sSak 608
firebathero 233
NaDa 32
Noble 18
Dota 2
monkeys_forever421
League of Legends
JimRising 795
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K145
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe319
Other Games
tarik_tv13280
summit1g9571
FrodaN5372
shahzam576
C9.Mang0438
KnowMe165
Maynarde154
Mew2King68
kaitlyn47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1950
BasetradeTV19
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta20
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki19
• iopq 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21966
• Ler47
League of Legends
• Doublelift4403
Other Games
• Scarra929
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
8h 52m
Soulkey vs BeSt
Snow vs Light
Wardi Open
9h 52m
Monday Night Weeklies
14h 52m
Replay Cast
22h 52m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 8h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 22h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs SHIN
MaNa vs MaxPax
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs Astrea
Classic vs sOs
BSL Team Wars
4 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
GuMiho vs Cham
ByuN vs TriGGeR
Cosmonarchy
5 days
TriGGeR vs YoungYakov
YoungYakov vs HonMonO
HonMonO vs TriGGeR
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Bunny
Creator vs Zoun
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS1
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Maestros of the Game
Sisters' Call Cup
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

LASL Season 20
2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
Skyesports Masters 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.