• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:24
CEST 04:24
KST 11:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed7Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension2Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Who will win EWC 2025? Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Starcraft in widescreen BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 491 users

[M] (4) Rapyuta

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Normal
Superouman
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
France2195 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-18 14:51:01
September 18 2012 14:18 GMT
#1
Rapyuta

Published on NA EU
By SUPEROUMAN
V 1.0

[image loading]


60 Degrees
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Special thing about the map:
- The third can be attacked without air vision from behind the wall.
- The map split isn't that obvious because of the position of the four middle expands and towers. In cross positions, it's easier to take the close air position instead of the close ground.
- Rocks have 1000hp because i originally wanted them to block the close position short path but it forced me to use a one-sized ramp there so i enlarged the ramp and divided the rocks in two halves.

Playable: 156x156

Map features:

Main and natural:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Third expand:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Fourth and the area in front of the natural:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Middle with a xel'naga tower:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Area between the naturals in close positions:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]



Tileset
[image loading]

Aesthetics
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


Change Log
+ Show Spoiler +
None yet.

Search "[SO]" on B.net to find all my maps ||| Cloud Kingdom / Turbo Cruise '84 / Bone Temple / Eternal Empire / Zen / Purity and Industry / Golden Wall / Fortitude / Beckett Industries / Waterfall
Deleted User 97295
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1137 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-18 14:23:43
September 18 2012 14:23 GMT
#2
--- Nuked ---
Superouman
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
France2195 Posts
September 18 2012 14:48 GMT
#3
Totally forgot to mention that the rocks have 1000hp since there are two on the path
Search "[SO]" on B.net to find all my maps ||| Cloud Kingdom / Turbo Cruise '84 / Bone Temple / Eternal Empire / Zen / Purity and Industry / Golden Wall / Fortitude / Beckett Industries / Waterfall
Ragoo
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany2773 Posts
September 18 2012 15:04 GMT
#4
Meh, I am not convinced that this is a good map.

Everything looks so chokey, especially the middle with all these trees looks like a complete mess.
I also dislike how everything is just so full of bricks and trees etc, and height levels have very, very similar aesthetics making it a hard to read map imo.
And rocks to prevent close positions...

I mean it's not Blizzard horrible but definitely not one of my favorites or anything I would get exctied about.

+ Show Spoiler +
P.S.: You invested time into a 4p mirrored map in SC 2. You should feel ashamed! Fuck 4p mirrored!!!1
Member of TPW mapmaking team/// twitter.com/Ragoo_ /// "goody represents border between explainable reason and supernatural" Cloud
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 18 2012 15:06 GMT
#5
Great to see this finally released! The changes from the previous version I saw have really taken this map from 'looking balanced but with some awkward bits' to 'holy crap I really hope some tournaments pick this up'.

Finally a 4p mirror map that is balanced for all spawn positions. The tournament map pool has been crying out for one for a long time. My only worry is the 3rd and it's non-standard nature, although I think it could lead to some really interesting dynamics. Can colossi walk over the wall behind the 3rd? The XNT area is really smart.

The aesthetics must have taken an age. I hope they don't negatively impact performance too much. How does it look when it's all creeped up?
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
September 18 2012 16:58 GMT
#6
It will be a huge pain to engage tank positions in the middle because of all the trees. Ultras especially are going to fail path a lot. I'm not sure this is the best map to experiment with the "copious spotty trees" idea.

Not sure the rocks should be 1000hp. The distance is quite close. How has this been in testing? Did you try with normal rocks at any point?

I like the concept but I think I have to go with ragoo on this one. Would like to see some games.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
September 18 2012 17:00 GMT
#7
On September 19 2012 00:04 Ragoo wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
P.S.: You invested time into a 4p mirrored map in SC 2. You should feel ashamed! Fuck 4p mirrored!!!1

I don't really know what you have against 4p mirror maps, other than the notion that they can't work, which is wrong.

I'd say overall this map has a very clever use of space, and manages to get the proportions for the spawn points just right as well. I do have one issue with it though - the Xel'Naga towers. It seems to me like they'll end up like they do on Metalopolis(assume for a second that all spawns on that map were ok), where the tower's vision becomes a lot less relevant in close ground positions. I've been thinking about it some, and the solution might just be to use 4 towers, like on Star Station. I don't know how that would work on this map(the middle area is a bit hard to read tbh), but it's not as big an issue.

As for its openness, it does look chokey like Ragoo says, but I think the idea is to encourage positional plays and flanks, just as on Cloud Kingdom. It is a fine line to walk though, so I do worry somewhat about that. Wait and see, I guess. Also a clever trick with the aesthetics, using a foggy sort of look to distinguish between the levels. It's also very pretty close-up.

Looks very good overall.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
September 18 2012 17:13 GMT
#8
It looks like the middle has a 3x3 blocker where it should be a 2x2 blocker, is that correct?

I like the doodad wall at the third. I know that this is the least standard part of this map, but hey, that's what does it for me

Close spawns still seems like it won't go past 4 base without ninja expands, sort of like antiga even in cross positions, so I guess that's okay.

As beautiful as it is I agree that it's a lille hard to distinguish between the levels, even with the fog, though I haven't played it in-game at all.
ArcticRaven
Profile Joined August 2011
France1406 Posts
September 18 2012 19:10 GMT
#9
So you made that texture set work together ? Oo

You're my hero.
[Govie] Wierd shit, on a 6 game AP winning streak with KOTL in the trench. I searched gandalf quotes and spammed them all game long, trenchwarfare247, whateva it takes!
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
September 18 2012 22:37 GMT
#10
On September 19 2012 04:10 ArcticRaven wrote:
So you made that texture set work together ? Oo

You're my hero.

Those were my thoughts as well. It's very good looking, but seeing that tileset, I had to scratch my head.

Also, what are the nat-nat rush distances for the various positions?
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
September 19 2012 02:50 GMT
#11
Idk about balance, but it's pretty and the middle is interesting. It's a well-done temple. "Castle in the Sky".. what is with superouman and sky-related names? :-P
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
September 19 2012 10:51 GMT
#12
Not really a fan of the map layout, but I do love the aesthetics. To be more specific, the things that I don't really like are:

1. The third base design makes me uncomfortable. I can't actually fault it from any balance/gameplay standpoint without any evidence; just gut reaction. Feel free to ignore this subjective criticism.
2. Close positions.
  • Attack path is a straight bee line with short distance -- distance issue being caused by flawed Metalopolis-style layout.
  • Rocks used as a crutch to lengthen the rush distance in the early game and help balance the spawn, but does not help the issue in mid/late game.
  • The third bases, being harass-able without need for air/high-ground vision, are particularly susceptible to pushes via rocked-off path.

3. Fourth bases are awkward in that you're forced to expand toward your opponent in a really awkward location IMO
4. Two watchtowers cover all possible ground attack paths in non-close positions
5. Close-by-air shenanigans, Metalopolis-style

Just my thoughts. All in all it feels like you took the terrain layout of Metalopolis and tried to make it not so bad in a different way than Metropolis attempted, but I really feel the layout concept itself just doesn't work well, be it Metalopolis, Metropolis, or this map. :c
Twitter: @iamcaustic
Aunvilgod
Profile Joined December 2011
2653 Posts
September 19 2012 10:56 GMT
#13
The tileset is interesting but really it just looks like another temple style map. Brown and green, yeah. While I don't think the textures are outstanding the usage of doodads is very nice.
ilovegroov | Blizzards mapmaker(s?) suck ass | #1 Protoss hater
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
September 19 2012 11:12 GMT
#14
I'm intrigued, will have to test in game to gauge proportions correctly.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
AssyrianKing
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Australia2111 Posts
September 19 2012 11:20 GMT
#15
Holy Aesthetics...
John 15:13
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 19 2012 12:01 GMT
#16
On September 19 2012 19:51 iamcaustic wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Not really a fan of the map layout, but I do love the aesthetics. To be more specific, the things that I don't really like are:

1. The third base design makes me uncomfortable. I can't actually fault it from any balance/gameplay standpoint without any evidence; just gut reaction. Feel free to ignore this subjective criticism.
2. Close positions.
  • Attack path is a straight bee line with short distance -- distance issue being caused by flawed Metalopolis-style layout.
  • Rocks used as a crutch to lengthen the rush distance in the early game and help balance the spawn, but does not help the issue in mid/late game.
  • The third bases, being harass-able without need for air/high-ground vision, are particularly susceptible to pushes via rocked-off path.

3. Fourth bases are awkward in that you're forced to expand toward your opponent in a really awkward location IMO
4. Two watchtowers cover all possible ground attack paths in non-close positions
5. Close-by-air shenanigans, Metalopolis-style

Just my thoughts. All in all it feels like you took the terrain layout of Metalopolis and tried to make it not so bad in a different way than Metropolis attempted, but I really feel the layout concept itself just doesn't work well, be it Metalopolis, Metropolis, or this map. :c


Welcome to making a 4p mirror map

I disagree with most of the criticisms laid out in this thread. I haven't played the map and it's difficult to tell proportions from an overview but I really don't think the rush distances are too bad. The rocks don't make the rush distances that much longer, they just help the flow of the early/mid game. I think 4th to 4th distance in close positions looks about the same as 4th to 5th on Cloud Kingdom and we have all seen that that can create some really awesome back and forth tug of war games. Let's not also forget that it doesn't have to create really long macro games in all positions, the close spawns here are infinitely better than all the 4p maps we have had in the tournament map pool so far, and probably the best I have seen in a 4p mirror map. As for the 3rd, I like it, it strikes a good balance. It encourages you to push out to take engagements rather than turtle.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
September 19 2012 17:14 GMT
#17
On September 19 2012 21:01 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2012 19:51 iamcaustic wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Not really a fan of the map layout, but I do love the aesthetics. To be more specific, the things that I don't really like are:

1. The third base design makes me uncomfortable. I can't actually fault it from any balance/gameplay standpoint without any evidence; just gut reaction. Feel free to ignore this subjective criticism.
2. Close positions.
  • Attack path is a straight bee line with short distance -- distance issue being caused by flawed Metalopolis-style layout.
  • Rocks used as a crutch to lengthen the rush distance in the early game and help balance the spawn, but does not help the issue in mid/late game.
  • The third bases, being harass-able without need for air/high-ground vision, are particularly susceptible to pushes via rocked-off path.

3. Fourth bases are awkward in that you're forced to expand toward your opponent in a really awkward location IMO
4. Two watchtowers cover all possible ground attack paths in non-close positions
5. Close-by-air shenanigans, Metalopolis-style

Just my thoughts. All in all it feels like you took the terrain layout of Metalopolis and tried to make it not so bad in a different way than Metropolis attempted, but I really feel the layout concept itself just doesn't work well, be it Metalopolis, Metropolis, or this map. :c


Welcome to making a 4p mirror map

I disagree with most of the criticisms laid out in this thread. I haven't played the map and it's difficult to tell proportions from an overview but I really don't think the rush distances are too bad. The rocks don't make the rush distances that much longer, they just help the flow of the early/mid game. I think 4th to 4th distance in close positions looks about the same as 4th to 5th on Cloud Kingdom and we have all seen that that can create some really awesome back and forth tug of war games. Let's not also forget that it doesn't have to create really long macro games in all positions, the close spawns here are infinitely better than all the 4p maps we have had in the tournament map pool so far, and probably the best I have seen in a 4p mirror map. As for the 3rd, I like it, it strikes a good balance. It encourages you to push out to take engagements rather than turtle.

The map is a decent bit larger overall, but the layout inherently makes close positions pretty darn close regardless. Superouman does a good job trying to mitigate the issue as much as possible, but I still feel the very concept is flawed just due to how the Metalopolis-style ends up putting those close position bases so close together while having a straight path connecting them.

4th to 4th distances do seem similar to those Cloud Kingdom distances between 4th and 5th, but you also have to remember that Cloud Kingdom gave alternative 4th/5th locations that increased the distance significantly when players expanded across rather than adjacent, where this map does not. With every game having such a short 4th to 4th distance I don't see how you're really going to get a 4th without doing ninja expansions -- or getting lucky with cross positions, perhaps.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
September 19 2012 22:11 GMT
#18
On September 20 2012 02:14 iamcaustic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2012 21:01 OxyGenesis wrote:
On September 19 2012 19:51 iamcaustic wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Not really a fan of the map layout, but I do love the aesthetics. To be more specific, the things that I don't really like are:

1. The third base design makes me uncomfortable. I can't actually fault it from any balance/gameplay standpoint without any evidence; just gut reaction. Feel free to ignore this subjective criticism.
2. Close positions.
  • Attack path is a straight bee line with short distance -- distance issue being caused by flawed Metalopolis-style layout.
  • Rocks used as a crutch to lengthen the rush distance in the early game and help balance the spawn, but does not help the issue in mid/late game.
  • The third bases, being harass-able without need for air/high-ground vision, are particularly susceptible to pushes via rocked-off path.

3. Fourth bases are awkward in that you're forced to expand toward your opponent in a really awkward location IMO
4. Two watchtowers cover all possible ground attack paths in non-close positions
5. Close-by-air shenanigans, Metalopolis-style

Just my thoughts. All in all it feels like you took the terrain layout of Metalopolis and tried to make it not so bad in a different way than Metropolis attempted, but I really feel the layout concept itself just doesn't work well, be it Metalopolis, Metropolis, or this map. :c


Welcome to making a 4p mirror map

I disagree with most of the criticisms laid out in this thread. I haven't played the map and it's difficult to tell proportions from an overview but I really don't think the rush distances are too bad. The rocks don't make the rush distances that much longer, they just help the flow of the early/mid game. I think 4th to 4th distance in close positions looks about the same as 4th to 5th on Cloud Kingdom and we have all seen that that can create some really awesome back and forth tug of war games. Let's not also forget that it doesn't have to create really long macro games in all positions, the close spawns here are infinitely better than all the 4p maps we have had in the tournament map pool so far, and probably the best I have seen in a 4p mirror map. As for the 3rd, I like it, it strikes a good balance. It encourages you to push out to take engagements rather than turtle.

The map is a decent bit larger overall, but the layout inherently makes close positions pretty darn close regardless. Superouman does a good job trying to mitigate the issue as much as possible, but I still feel the very concept is flawed just due to how the Metalopolis-style ends up putting those close position bases so close together while having a straight path connecting them.

4th to 4th distances do seem similar to those Cloud Kingdom distances between 4th and 5th, but you also have to remember that Cloud Kingdom gave alternative 4th/5th locations that increased the distance significantly when players expanded across rather than adjacent, where this map does not. With every game having such a short 4th to 4th distance I don't see how you're really going to get a 4th without doing ninja expansions -- or getting lucky with cross positions, perhaps.


Antiga has an even harder 4th and has been in the map pool for well over a year. The whole point in a map with multiple spawns is to give varied games.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-19 23:29:18
September 19 2012 23:19 GMT
#19
On September 20 2012 07:11 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2012 02:14 iamcaustic wrote:
On September 19 2012 21:01 OxyGenesis wrote:
On September 19 2012 19:51 iamcaustic wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Not really a fan of the map layout, but I do love the aesthetics. To be more specific, the things that I don't really like are:

1. The third base design makes me uncomfortable. I can't actually fault it from any balance/gameplay standpoint without any evidence; just gut reaction. Feel free to ignore this subjective criticism.
2. Close positions.
  • Attack path is a straight bee line with short distance -- distance issue being caused by flawed Metalopolis-style layout.
  • Rocks used as a crutch to lengthen the rush distance in the early game and help balance the spawn, but does not help the issue in mid/late game.
  • The third bases, being harass-able without need for air/high-ground vision, are particularly susceptible to pushes via rocked-off path.

3. Fourth bases are awkward in that you're forced to expand toward your opponent in a really awkward location IMO
4. Two watchtowers cover all possible ground attack paths in non-close positions
5. Close-by-air shenanigans, Metalopolis-style

Just my thoughts. All in all it feels like you took the terrain layout of Metalopolis and tried to make it not so bad in a different way than Metropolis attempted, but I really feel the layout concept itself just doesn't work well, be it Metalopolis, Metropolis, or this map. :c


Welcome to making a 4p mirror map

I disagree with most of the criticisms laid out in this thread. I haven't played the map and it's difficult to tell proportions from an overview but I really don't think the rush distances are too bad. The rocks don't make the rush distances that much longer, they just help the flow of the early/mid game. I think 4th to 4th distance in close positions looks about the same as 4th to 5th on Cloud Kingdom and we have all seen that that can create some really awesome back and forth tug of war games. Let's not also forget that it doesn't have to create really long macro games in all positions, the close spawns here are infinitely better than all the 4p maps we have had in the tournament map pool so far, and probably the best I have seen in a 4p mirror map. As for the 3rd, I like it, it strikes a good balance. It encourages you to push out to take engagements rather than turtle.

The map is a decent bit larger overall, but the layout inherently makes close positions pretty darn close regardless. Superouman does a good job trying to mitigate the issue as much as possible, but I still feel the very concept is flawed just due to how the Metalopolis-style ends up putting those close position bases so close together while having a straight path connecting them.

4th to 4th distances do seem similar to those Cloud Kingdom distances between 4th and 5th, but you also have to remember that Cloud Kingdom gave alternative 4th/5th locations that increased the distance significantly when players expanded across rather than adjacent, where this map does not. With every game having such a short 4th to 4th distance I don't see how you're really going to get a 4th without doing ninja expansions -- or getting lucky with cross positions, perhaps.


Antiga has an even harder 4th and has been in the map pool for well over a year. The whole point in a map with multiple spawns is to give varied games.

Antiga is also a pretty terrible map, and only becomes remotely playable for tournaments by disabling everything except cross-spawns. I don't really see that as a valid argument. I would definitely rank this map as being better than Antiga any day.

Edit: one thing I will say, though, is that if the map is intentionally made by design to discourage 4+ base games and focus on aggressive, early/mid game plays, then that's fine (e.g. I designed my map Secluded Mesa with the intention that very few games would ever see all 5 bases being taken). It's up to the mapmaker to determine how he/she wants the map to play out. My opinions come squarely on the idea that 4p maps are usually designed to be more macro-oriented in nature, in which case I find this map would make it quite difficult for macro play to occur for the reasons I've stated.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
sorrowptoss
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada1431 Posts
September 20 2012 00:54 GMT
#20
Sweet Jesus Lord... That's a whole lot of details you got going on there. It struck me like the sound of the initial thunder that gives way to the very first raindrops in the middle of a summer night.

How long did it take you to make this?
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
September 20 2012 03:18 GMT
#21
This map is beautiful. Also props for basing a map on Castle in the Sky.
Hello
Whiplash
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2928 Posts
September 20 2012 04:25 GMT
#22
This is one of the coolest maps I've seen in a long time. I LOVE the detail and work you put into the aethestics and the map looks like it could be really fun to play as well. Looks like theres lots of chokes and ramps which I think could make for some really good micro scenarios/flanks. Keep it up Superouman, I definiately want to see this map being used by pros.
Cinematographer / Steadicam Operator. Former Starcraft commentator/player
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
SEL Masters #4 - Day 2
CranKy Ducklings82
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 243
ProTech54
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 15213
Artosis 932
NaDa 37
Icarus 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1055
NeuroSwarm140
League of Legends
JimRising 782
Trikslyr88
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1531
taco 307
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox798
Other Games
summit1g15807
shahzam1303
Day[9].tv501
C9.Mang0248
WinterStarcraft214
Maynarde168
Mew2King33
RuFF_SC219
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3454
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH208
• Mapu9
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2504
• Rush1461
Other Games
• Day9tv501
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 36m
WardiTV European League
13h 36m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
21h 36m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 13h
Replay Cast
1d 21h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.