• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:19
CEST 22:19
KST 05:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall5HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL33Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) WardiTV Mondays SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 $200 Biweekly - StarCraft Evolution League #1
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL Help: rep cant save Where did Hovz go? BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 621 users

Work In Progress Melee Maps - Page 204

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 202 203 204 205 206 217 Next
Keep our forum clean! PLEASE post your WIP melee maps in this thread for initial feedback. -Barrin
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
April 21 2017 16:01 GMT
#4061
What do you think about this version?

[image loading]
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
April 22 2017 06:23 GMT
#4062
The middle of the map is really featureless. Antiga and Lerilak had similar (though more featureful and smaller) middles and they were still rather dull. Also not a fan of the possible thirds--the way they're placed makes them really hard to defend since any attacking force can very easily "split" them from the natural. In fact I think the core weakness of the map is that to get anywhere at all you have to step into the central donut (the low ground in white). I think a good map has to have a more "connected" architecture.
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-22 13:13:53
April 22 2017 11:53 GMT
#4063
On April 22 2017 15:23 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Also not a fan of the possible thirds--the way they're placed makes them really hard to defend since any attacking force can very easily "split" them from the natural. In fact I think the core weakness of the map is that to get anywhere at all you have to step into the central donut (the low ground in white). I think a good map has to have a more "connected" architecture.


Why do you think this is a bad thing? Because this was intentionally designed to be that way - to force people onto the lowground. Same thing for the other bases - the chokes are small, but you can not defend them by sitting on the highground. That way, was the intention, the bases can be easily defended by static defense and walls on one hand, but the aggressor still has no problem attacking the other player. And in any case, the top base (which is actually the more intended one) does not force you to split your force. I am trying to avoid a situation like on Antiga and Entombed where people just safely camp on their highgrounds.

Agree about the center though.

Another thing, We are basically not seeing blink all-ins any more. Do you think the main is protected enough?
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
April 22 2017 22:34 GMT
#4064
On April 22 2017 20:53 Aunvilgodess wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2017 15:23 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Also not a fan of the possible thirds--the way they're placed makes them really hard to defend since any attacking force can very easily "split" them from the natural. In fact I think the core weakness of the map is that to get anywhere at all you have to step into the central donut (the low ground in white). I think a good map has to have a more "connected" architecture.


Why do you think this is a bad thing? Because this was intentionally designed to be that way - to force people onto the lowground. Same thing for the other bases - the chokes are small, but you can not defend them by sitting on the highground. That way, was the intention, the bases can be easily defended by static defense and walls on one hand, but the aggressor still has no problem attacking the other player. And in any case, the top base (which is actually the more intended one) does not force you to split your force. I am trying to avoid a situation like on Antiga and Entombed where people just safely camp on their highgrounds.

Agree about the center though.

Another thing, We are basically not seeing blink all-ins any more. Do you think the main is protected enough?


The main looks fine to me--I wouldn't worry too much about blink all-ins or reapers. Maybe siege tanks can be problematic if they can reach the main ramp from the third (not sure about that). As for the hole in the main that's present in the bottom main, and not the top main, that's just a mistake right? If it isn't, I don't like it since it just seems to be aggravating to defend terran drops as zerg with that hole there.

The reason why I dislike how everything connects to the central donut is two-fold. First of all I don't think it makes army placement and movements very interesting. Maps like Abyssal Reef are great because of all the different movement options they afford to the player. Secondly, the way the thirds and all the other bases connect to the lowground, means they lack an avenue of retreat. On most maps it's an option to try to defend the attack and retreat to the natural if the defense goes wrong. On this map you'll usually lose an entire mineral line and possibly more if your army gets backed up into the third. It just makes pushes so much more likely to end the game outright.
Shiraq
Profile Joined March 2016
17 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-28 18:04:51
April 28 2017 17:59 GMT
#4065
Looking for feedback on my first map. No textures or doodads yet, since I'll probably have to change the layout. So never mind that it looks depressing! Any blatant mistakes I've made? I'm looking to learn how to make good maps, so don't be shy. Tear it apart if needs be, but please be constructive! Thanks in advance!

[image loading]

Edit: Topdown view:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
April 29 2017 07:39 GMT
#4066
The main has too many openings. The back entrance near the air blockers at the very least should go, since it doesn't seem to serve much purpose for this map. Even the entrance to the pocket natural feels very dangerous due to the way it is placed. I'd suggest changing the layout so that the defender can move more easily between the two ramps than the aggressor. I like the core idea of a pocket base that's blocked off by rocks, but it can be executed better. RQM has made a few maps playing with this idea (Nexon Arena, Stormwind, Geumgangsan at http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/514377-rqm-map-compilation); see if you can get some inspiration from them.

Air blockers are pretty buggy, and I wouldn't use them unless they are really necessary for the map. I don't think these are.

Likewise unusual mineral line values should only be used when they serve the map. For example the 6m/1g bases are already undesirable bases that no one would take until they reach their 5th or 6th base, so why make them more undesirable?

And overall the map especially the middle of the map is really choky and needs more open space. The only way to get across the map are a bunch of tiny ramps.
Shiraq
Profile Joined March 2016
17 Posts
April 29 2017 13:22 GMT
#4067
The main has too many openings. The back entrance near the air blockers at the very least should go, since it doesn't seem to serve much purpose for this map.


I'm not sure which one you mean? The main has only two entrances. The small main ramp, and the bigger ramp to the natural just behind the rocks. Here's a more zoomed in picture of the main in case it's hard to make out from the overview picture. The thing by the northern air blocker is just a reaper/colossi ledge, not a ramp.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]



Even the entrance to the pocket natural feels very dangerous due to the way it is placed. I'd suggest changing the layout so that the defender can move more easily between the two ramps than the aggressor. I like the core idea of a pocket base that's blocked off by rocks, but it can be executed better. RQM has made a few maps playing with this idea (Nexon Arena, Stormwind, Geumgangsan at http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/514377-rqm-map-compilation); see if you can get some inspiration from them.


I personally found the rock entrance pretty scary to attack through in testing, since you can be attacked from the high ground as you pass and it's somewhat tight. I am assuming we are talking some kind of early attack here, since it shouldn't matter much once you've taken your third? I think it's hard to even break those rocks as the aggressor without taking a beating. But maybe there is some matchup/timing attack that I'm not thinking about? I could move the rocks back one step to make it even harder to destroy them. Or move the cliff slightly closer (over what is now unpathable ground just above the rocks) to give the defender an even better vantage point. I thought about doing that before, but felt it was overkill in the end and that the natural would be ridiculously safe with such a tight passage directly overlooked by high ground. Could you expand more on what kind of situations you feel it's dangerous?

I should probably explain what I'm going for in terms of the main-nat-third design. I want a similar interaction as in Dusk Towers, where you could drop the third, but also fly past it and drop the natural, as well as being able to drop the main from the opposite side. I thought that was cool but a bit extreme with the huge deadspace on Dusk Towers, so I wanted to make something similar but with a much tighter dead space outside the third. So that once you've taken your third the nat is still droppable, but less so, since a turret by the dead space at your third can just barely cover the whole dead space. A drop could still move past, especially if it's medivacs and you boost them, but it wouldn't be "free" as in Dusk Towers. You'd take extra damage. That's also why I used the air blocker to narrow down the droppable area of the natural. Perhaps I overdid it though? It's probably almost impossible to drop the natural now after the third is taken, now that I think of it. I think I'll look into opening the nat up a bit more to the deadspace.

I also wanted to make the main-nat-third more easily manoeuvrable by the defender, hence the whole area with the two ramps and the rocks, to promote easier flow of units within the main-nat-third, should you chose to open it up after taking your third.

Any thoughts on the validity of the basic idea as well as the execution of it would be much appreciated!

Likewise unusual mineral line values should only be used when they serve the map. For example the 6m/1g bases are already undesirable bases that no one would take until they reach their 5th or 6th base, so why make them more undesirable?


I'm probably not a good enough player to judge these things, but here are my thoughts/reasons for the altered resource counts:

I felt the 6+1 base was too easy a 5th for a Zerg player. With it being so far away from everything else on the map, but still easily reachable to defend from the 4th. It felt like it was always a better choice than the other two options for a 5th who are both much closer to the center of the map. Therefore I reduced the resource count to make it less attractive. Was that unnecessary?

The 10+1 base, I simply wanted to remove one gas because I was worried a 4 base mech push from that base could be OP. Since the narrow ramp isn't an overly huge barrier to a mech push, especially with the XNT providing vision I feel a meching player would be able to siege crawl his way onto the high ground and then be extremely close to the opponents 4th/5th. I actually don't remember why I added 2 mineral patches, and thinking about it now that's probably stupid as it might make a bio parade push from that base too strong. The whole idea with that base was to give an option for a more aggressive expansion for exactly those kind of attacks (mech, bio parade push), but I was scared of making it too effective. Maybe those concerns were unwarranted?

And overall the map especially the middle of the map is really choky and needs more open space. The only way to get across the map are a bunch of tiny ramps.


In a way that's "a feature, not a bug". The idea is that it's supposed to be hard to get onto your opponents part of the central high ground in the late game, other than through the middle, which is also hard but offers interesting possibilities for manoeuvring (I think?) and that the side paths offer a way to try to get your opponent out of position. Before the late game the same dynamic doesn't exist at all though since you can't really have your army sitting that far out without being super vulnerable to harass, so the map is really open to begin with, and has some pretty good opportunities for flanking as well at that stage. In general the map felt much bigger and more open than I had expected when I started playtesting it.

That said, I'm looking at the middle now and I realise it is far too cramped for big lategame armies. I shall try to expand it a bit! And, I think, also increase the ramps by the XNT from 2 to 3 wide.

The map used to be bigger, by the way, but I reduced it in size several times because it felt incredibly Zerg favoured at first. So I don't (yet, at least, but feel free to wheigh in!) want to open it up too much. But the mid, definitely.
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-04-29 16:20:17
April 29 2017 16:15 GMT
#4068
New update:

[image loading]

what do you think? I am looking for feedback especially regarding the 6 and 12 o'clock bases and their connection to the potential 3rd. I hope you can make out everything properly. The goal is to make bases that are easy to take but difficult to turtle on. Another goal is to make chokepoints stronger, so that it is more like Broodwar in that regard. I want to make it possible to really seal off an expansion with pylons, cannons, depots etc.. While sentries will be strong on this map I don't think they would be overwhelming. Helps that 2 base sentry all ins are not a thing any more.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
April 30 2017 00:02 GMT
#4069
@Shiraq

Oh yeah I thought the reaper ledge was a ramp.

There are two reason why I find the main/natural setup dangerous. The first is siege tanks. Sticking siege tanks below or beside the rocks really allows a terran to bottle up the natural and really abuse the defender. Entombed Valley had a somewhat similar setup (though less vulnerable since it was the third not the natural, and there wasn't a ramp that could be cut off from the low ground) and there were some really difficult pushes. The second is more general. If there's an early timing it's easier for the attacking player to switch between the main and the natural than the defender. Yeah the high ground is pretty good for the defender, but you can easily slip in a few lings past that, and distance-wise the attacker has the advantage which I don't really like. I do like the basic idea of the main/nat/third (except for the air blockers, since air blockers are too buggy to be used). Maybe you could rotate all the bases a bit counter-clockwise? I think it would help the idea.

I don't think your reasons for using the altered resources are enough to justify them. The 6m/1g is all the way across the map: that alone makes it not "too safe". Besides there's a lot of things I'd worry about before worrying about whether a fifth base is too safe enough to need a 2m/1g difference. I can appreciate the reasoning behind the 10m/1g better, but I don't think people will take that base as a fourth in the first place, so I also think it isn't a problem.

As for how choky it is I'll only say that it is by far the most prevalent problem I see in maps by people that are trying to get into mapmaking (myself included). If you really feel hindered by terrain when moving around the map it usually means the map is too choky and lacks flow. Try moving a zerg army around the map and see if you are able to find places where you can engage a siege tank based army.

@Aunvilgodess

Some of your gas geysers (natural and third) look placed incorrectly. Some of the mineral lines too I think, though I can't be sure from the overview. And the natural and thirds are definitely not symmetrical right now.

Making the bases more BW-like is laudable, but I'm not convinced it's possible. Sentries are definitely broken on this map as are siege tanks and liberators. The main/nat/third of the original version of Namaste was somewhat similar in concept and had tons and tons of problems. Maybe try reducing the size of the main (which is much bigger than it needs to be) to give more space to the third.
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-01 12:29:21
May 01 2017 12:28 GMT
#4070
thx for the feedback. I opened up a lot of chokes on the map.

[image loading]

By the way, does anybody know how I can export a map image into a format that isn't tga? I can only open tgas in Libre office and when I export from there it gets compressed like crazy.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
May 01 2017 16:24 GMT
#4071
I usually export as tga, then open it in Gimp to get it in another format.
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
May 03 2017 22:31 GMT
#4072
Any thoughts on the changes?
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
May 04 2017 14:15 GMT
#4073
I'm at work right now (shhhh) so can't really draw anything out but I'll briefly share some thoughts.

Main base seems a little too big / awkward. There is a lot of space for reapers/blink/drops/harass that covering your entire main could be more of a pain in the butt. Also, the random parts you have "jutting" out I think are unnecessary.

The Northwest and Southeast sides of the map I just can't see being used all that much. Maybe you'll take one of the bases as a 4th if you expand vertically but otherwise it might be easier just to take "your corner" (so SW & NE sides) of the map and each get 5 bases. The corner island bases...no..I don't like them one bit and they just look thrown in there just because. I'd just get rid of them.

The Five paths are neat and I think it works out pretty nice. I think you should just mold the map around that. Although as I said with the 3 corner bases (NW and SE corners) I almost would rather those get deleted and rework the lower ground paths to open them up a little bit. As of right now it seems the only non-choky part of the map is the middle, which is also the best push path, which means the majority of attacks will come from it.

It would be kind of cool to have the 5 paths where it goes Low ground (edges) > high(where golds are) > low (middle) > high (golds) > low (edges).

I'd also then put the vertical 3rd bases on the low ground so they are connected to that low ground path. I'd also open up the high ground paths a little bit so they aren't so choked, especially around the golds.

I'd love to go into more detail and draw out on photoshop just exactly I'm thinking and maybe I can do that sometime later today or this weekend, but as of right now...gotta get back to work! <3 Keep up the good mapping!
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-04 18:46:35
May 04 2017 18:43 GMT
#4074
On May 04 2017 23:15 SidianTheBard wrote:The Northwest and Southeast sides of the map I just can't see being used all that much. Maybe you'll take one of the bases as a 4th if you expand vertically but otherwise it might be easier just to take "your corner" (so SW & NE sides) of the map and each get 5 bases. The corner island bases...no..I don't like them one bit and they just look thrown in there just because. I'd just get rid of them.


Finally the myth of dead space is dead!

thx for the feedback though. Ill try to make the bases next to the bridges more viable, but the bridges are one of the central elements of the map for me so Ill try to keep them. Do you think I can get rid of the small ramps next to the gold bases? I mean the one below the bottom gold and above the top gold base. That way the 5 paths would be more defined and the other paths would be more defined but I think Zerg might need them.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
May 05 2017 00:20 GMT
#4075
i've never got why having dead space is a valid complaint. maybe as a balance concern regarding air units, but definitely not the design issue people have treated it as. this isn't bw where you only have several fixed map sizes to work with...
vibeo gane,
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-05 01:01:30
May 05 2017 01:00 GMT
#4076
[image loading]

I think you could make it really cool with the whole 5 paths theme. Make the two higher ground paths choked with rocks on all the smaller chokes so unless you break the rocks your army gets "stuck" in that path.

Maybe you could move the island base closer. Wasn't sure how it'd look.

Put some water or rock doodads in the middle low ground area and throw some LoSB to make it a little less push friendly.

I know you might feel the map revolves around those corner bridges but it doesn't, it revolves around your pathways in the middle because those bridges on the corners will never (well...rarely) get used. I'm under the impression you started creating the map with those bridges in mind and now want to work around them no matter what. I look at the map and those bridges just seem awkward as heck. Now, if you want them in your map, by all means, it's your map so please do! I'm just sharing my thoughts when looking at it.

I hope I"m not sounding condescending, I'm not trying to, just sharing my thoughts! Looking forward to your next update on it!

Cheers!
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
May 05 2017 15:25 GMT
#4077
The thing is that I don't really see the 5 paths being enough of a sufficiently distinctive theme, and not the one i was going for anyway. It would feel too generic. Just like Cloud Kingdom where the S shape was looking cool in the overview but had hardly any impact.

I want a more horizontal, long "front line" instead of a deep line where you expand towards the opponent where your bases are easy to defend through static defense due to small ramps (or narrow bridges!), but the attacker having more possible paths of attack instead. The outer paths are an element of that. If I delete the bridges the front line would be too narrow and might develop in Daybreak Variation # 9000. I think I will move the bases adjacent to the bridge further towards their respective mains, especially the vertical one, so vertical expanding is encouraged.

I think I might just delete the central golds to make the outer lowground paths more viable. I think I would like to try to keep the small chokes on the highground path though. IMO small chokes are mostly a problem if you don't control your army properly.

I also deleted the islands and moved the vertical 3rds to the low ground. I'll post pics tomorrow I think.

thx for the feedback
Aunvilgodess
Profile Joined May 2016
954 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-05-08 22:02:55
May 06 2017 14:59 GMT
#4078
[image loading]

what do you think?
lorestarcraft
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1049 Posts
May 19 2017 03:50 GMT
#4079
This is a WIP I was working on, trying to get the high ground concept to work. Thoughts, anyone?

[image loading]
SC2 Mapmaker
Lycanthoss
Profile Joined April 2017
Lithuania29 Posts
May 19 2017 07:28 GMT
#4080
On May 19 2017 12:50 lorestarcraft wrote:
This is a WIP I was working on, trying to get the high ground concept to work. Thoughts, anyone?

[image loading]


the expansion under the main would basically never be taken as from this picture i presume this map is rather small-medium size and extreme late game wouldnt be reached. The small pillars in the middle could make some pathing issues if playing against a protoss.
Zerashk Gulida
Prev 1 202 203 204 205 206 217 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
20:00
Mid Season Playoffs
SHIN vs Bunny
Cham vs MaNa
SKillous vs TBD
PAPI vs Jumy
Gerald vs Moja
ArT vs TBD
SteadfastSC269
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 269
IndyStarCraft 209
UpATreeSC 131
goblin 126
ProTech83
Livibee 52
StarCraft: Brood War
Aegong 78
scan(afreeca) 34
yabsab 15
Dota 2
Gorgc7438
Pyrionflax171
League of Legends
Grubby4062
Dendi1103
Counter-Strike
fl0m2095
pashabiceps607
Foxcn216
sgares13
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu563
Khaldor173
Other Games
summit1g5936
FrodaN1777
Beastyqt636
mouzStarbuck446
Trikslyr84
Sick73
Mew2King66
ZombieGrub54
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 39
• davetesta32
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 23
• Eskiya23 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV644
League of Legends
• Jankos2597
• Doublelift2080
• TFBlade1363
• masondota2486
Other Games
• Scarra1041
• imaqtpie1040
• Shiphtur232
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 41m
The PondCast
13h 41m
RSL Revival
13h 41m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
19h 41m
Replay Cast
1d 3h
RSL Revival
1d 13h
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
1d 19h
FEL
1d 19h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.