• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:08
CEST 16:08
KST 23:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End6Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7
Community News
GSTL Returns in 2026!43Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-2212Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-611
StarCraft 2
General
GSTL Returns in 2026! Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Talent Announcement! Protoss AoE skill expression Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) WardiTV Mondays 2026 KungFu Cup Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome Mutation # 538 Media Blackout Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory
Brood War
General
Rush's Odyssey Controversy [ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End BW General Discussion StarCraft 64 is coming to Philly at SC4ALL II Best Games Kespa era
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL22] Ro24 Group A CSLAN 4 is Coming! ASL Season 22 LIVESTREAM with English Commentary
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Any training maps people recommend? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Artificial Intelligence Thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently...
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Chinese Gen Z: Between Dream…
TrAiDoS
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8820 users

[D]Different Natural Design - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
August 09 2012 23:50 GMT
#21
On August 10 2012 08:22 moskonia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2012 08:09 TheFish7 wrote:
Sloppy, but you get the idea, gives the player the option to wall off in 2 different ways, but prevents pylons being built close enough to the rocks to warp in over them. (assume the lowest level of terrain here is either not pathable, or better yet is the corner of the map) (the nat would be on the left in this case)

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Can that wall be blocked by the standard Protoss wall as well? (gate + core + zealot) it seems like it would be a bit problematic.


Just move the gateway backwards 1 square
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
DoubleReed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4130 Posts
August 10 2012 01:02 GMT
#22
Honestly I think it looks like kind of a cool idea.

The main issue I see as a zerg player is that I wouldn't have creep in the right places to defend rushes/contains. Maybe if the base was closer to the ramp it wouldn't be as much of an issue? Or maybe that would make it worse? I'm not sure. I'd have to try it out.
xeqwist
Profile Joined July 2012
55 Posts
August 10 2012 01:37 GMT
#23
Sorry for the relatively late response, but I'm glad to see that so many of you have responded!

Obviously there is some problems with the design in the way I presented it. ex. I'd probably have to add some LoS blockers on the other side of the rocks to prevent warp-ins, and the ramps might have to be rearranged to be more balanced considering zerg's creep spread, etc., but I probably will try to incorporate this into the map I'm making since I've gotten quite a lot of positive feedback!
I have a few ideas after looking through all of your replies!

Thanks to everyone who came with their input!! =D

I'm also particularly interested in seeing OxyGenisis' map with a similar concept.
xeqwist.195 EU | ♥ BitByBit ♥ MarineKing ♥ | Marine good unit.
Callynn
Profile Joined December 2010
Netherlands917 Posts
August 10 2012 09:04 GMT
#24
On August 10 2012 05:44 OxyGenesis wrote:
That's actually exactly the set up that I have for my new map. It's nearly done so I'll probably release it soon. Here's a sneak peek.

[image loading]


I think your wide rocks actually pose a bigger problem than the smaller rocks from the OP. You need that choke towards your natural once the rocks are down.
Comparing BW with SCII is like comparing a beautiful three-master sailing ship with a modern battlecruiser. Both are beautiful in their own way, both perform the same task, but they are worlds apart in how they are built and how they are steered.
OxyGenesis
Profile Joined May 2012
United Kingdom281 Posts
August 10 2012 10:28 GMT
#25
On August 10 2012 18:04 Callynn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2012 05:44 OxyGenesis wrote:
That's actually exactly the set up that I have for my new map. It's nearly done so I'll probably release it soon. Here's a sneak peek.

[image loading]


I think your wide rocks actually pose a bigger problem than the smaller rocks from the OP. You need that choke towards your natural once the rocks are down.


I'm actually not convinced that you do need the smaller choke as I think the rocks take long enough to break down that the defender has ample time to get defences like spine crawlers up, especially has they have the high ground. I did actually do a version with smaller rocks however, just felt the larger rocks were neater. I would love for someone to do some testing in to viable aggressive builds against this setup, based around breaking down your enemies rocks and the pros and cons of large choke vs small choke. Also whether you can hit the rocks from the low ground is something to be considered.

[image loading]

As for the 4gate issue, I think there is probably a way to use invisible LoS blockers in the rocks and then a trigger that destroys them when the rocks are broke down. That's something I might look in to but using regular LoS blockers is also a fine solution.
Maker of Maps inc. Vector, Uncanny Valley and Fissure | Co-Founder of SC2Melee.net
xeqwist
Profile Joined July 2012
55 Posts
August 10 2012 12:56 GMT
#26
Oxy, I love the atmosphere in that map, I'm not sure about the whole small vs. big choke but I think a smaller choke is gonna actually benefit the attacker as forcefields/tanks(/banelings?) have potential to do more "damage" in chokes. So I think your initial design might be more balanced... not completely sure though.
xeqwist.195 EU | ♥ BitByBit ♥ MarineKing ♥ | Marine good unit.
a3den
Profile Joined April 2012
704 Posts
August 10 2012 18:01 GMT
#27
Oxy : I like bigger rocks better, this layout with the small high ground vantage point leading to the ramp is way better though.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-10 21:09:51
August 10 2012 20:09 GMT
#28
On August 10 2012 19:28 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2012 18:04 Callynn wrote:
On August 10 2012 05:44 OxyGenesis wrote:
That's actually exactly the set up that I have for my new map. It's nearly done so I'll probably release it soon. Here's a sneak peek.




I think your wide rocks actually pose a bigger problem than the smaller rocks from the OP. You need that choke towards your natural once the rocks are down.


I'm actually not convinced that you do need the smaller choke as I think the rocks take long enough to break down that the defender has ample time to get defences like spine crawlers up, especially has they have the high ground. I did actually do a version with smaller rocks however, just felt the larger rocks were neater. I would love for someone to do some testing in to viable aggressive builds against this setup, based around breaking down your enemies rocks and the pros and cons of large choke vs small choke. Also whether you can hit the rocks from the low ground is something to be considered.

The rocks take too long to break for a rush to be "unbeatable". Any rush requiring a wall will be easy enough to beat, you only need to wall your initial entrance and then secure your natural with wall/units. Any rush relying on a straight up fight will be so delayed by rocks that the defender will have ample time to prepare. It's not very different from a normal natural at all, there is a slight increased opportunity for the attacker because of the 2 paths, but there will be a wall there anyway if it matters. This design, in general, is just fine. Frankly, it doesn't add that much to the dynamics of the natural; you can just defend in front of the rocks, like a normal FE but with the expo tucked far away from the wall -- beyond the main base in fact. But a little change of pace is good.

You can re-envision this setup as one large main base with an in-base expo, and a block of negative space inside the main base. The real entrance to the main base is probably wider than a 1ramp, but until the rocks obscuring one side of the negative space are broken, the 1ramp is your functional main entrance. Beyond 6 minutes it's a completely normal game except you have this blob of unbuildable terrain in your main base.

On August 10 2012 19:28 OxyGenesis wrote:
As for the 4gate issue, I think there is probably a way to use invisible LoS blockers in the rocks and then a trigger that destroys them when the rocks are broke down. That's something I might look in to but using regular LoS blockers is also a fine solution.

You could also just use the data editor to make the rocks block vision. ^^

But I think normal LosB are fine, it doesn't really hurt anything. Very minor reduction in buildable space which shoudn't have a real effect if you have enough build space in the main base.

edit: I should add that PvZ and TvZ are the only real things you need to consider. The other matchups depend on a "fair fight" compared to the zerg swarming past your wall in XvZ. This is why you can just make a wall at your 1ramp and be fine, the rocks take too long to break for a "rush" to succeed. The design has far more impact in a later attack before the 3base stage of the game, where you can use some tech units with good position to really mangle defensive efforts. But at that point, the defender should have been trying to hold the front area before he gets his position split.

edit2: Actually this does change one thing significantly. Protoss can't deny the natural with forcefields for nearly as long. Usually trapped player has to wait for blink or colossus, or medivacs or tanks, or zerg can be broken in half (literally) with a sentry prism gateway all-in.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
iamcaustic
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada1509 Posts
August 11 2012 17:57 GMT
#29
On August 10 2012 19:28 OxyGenesis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2012 18:04 Callynn wrote:
On August 10 2012 05:44 OxyGenesis wrote:
That's actually exactly the set up that I have for my new map. It's nearly done so I'll probably release it soon. Here's a sneak peek.

[image loading]


I think your wide rocks actually pose a bigger problem than the smaller rocks from the OP. You need that choke towards your natural once the rocks are down.


I'm actually not convinced that you do need the smaller choke as I think the rocks take long enough to break down that the defender has ample time to get defences like spine crawlers up, especially has they have the high ground. I did actually do a version with smaller rocks however, just felt the larger rocks were neater. I would love for someone to do some testing in to viable aggressive builds against this setup, based around breaking down your enemies rocks and the pros and cons of large choke vs small choke. Also whether you can hit the rocks from the low ground is something to be considered.

[image loading]

As for the 4gate issue, I think there is probably a way to use invisible LoS blockers in the rocks and then a trigger that destroys them when the rocks are broke down. That's something I might look in to but using regular LoS blockers is also a fine solution.

It's starting to look a lot like a more turtle-friendly version of the Entombed Valley 3-base layout, with that third base just outside the other main base ramp. Can't say I'm the biggest fan of that.
Twitter: @iamcaustic
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Weekly
11:00
WardiTV Mondays #100
IntoTheiNu 1190
WardiTV977
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 212
Rex 150
BRAT_OK 70
SHIN 27
RushiSC 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 7752
Mini 1466
BeSt 892
Shuttle 880
EffOrt 806
Soulkey 728
Soma 426
Stork 403
Larva 195
ggaemo 176
[ Show more ]
Mong 154
Snow 139
ZerO 113
Hyun 96
Pusan 92
Mind 70
sSak 50
Sexy 49
Bale 33
sorry 19
zelot 19
Terrorterran 13
Noble 10
Icarus 9
Dota 2
Gorgc8760
Dendi2498
qojqva1657
BananaSlamJamma375
Counter-Strike
markeloff128
Other Games
singsing2323
hiko738
B2W.Neo523
Lowko418
crisheroes334
Liquid`VortiX206
Hui .167
RotterdaM101
QueenE63
Mew2King58
Livibee45
ArmadaUGS35
amsayoshi30
ZerO(Twitch)18
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV840
League of Legends
• Jankos725
• TFBlade703
Upcoming Events
The Patches Monday
1h 52m
Afreeca Starleague
19h 52m
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
GSL
20h 52m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 19h
BeSt vs Paralyze
Jaedong vs Speed
Kung Fu Cup
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
PiG Sty Festival
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiG Sty Festival
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLAN 4
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
RSL Revival: Season 6
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
META DYMY #4
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 22: Qualifier 1
Escore Tournament S3: W8
CSL Season 22: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.