• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:02
CEST 13:02
KST 20:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly4Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard"4ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!32Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)101
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) 3kb/s downloading patch..... are we back to 1998? How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly INu's Battles#18 - Cure, herO, Rogue & ByuN Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Industrial Park New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate
External Content
Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL22 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool
Tourneys
Escore Tournament - Season 3 2v2v2v2 Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Star Con San Diego 2026
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread 2026-27 Football Thread placeholder TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Games, Hormones, and "Dark" …
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4773 users

[M] (4) Omnivium by prodiG - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
June 28 2012 23:37 GMT
#61
Cliff near 3rd? Like Lost Temple? You really want same mistake?
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
June 29 2012 00:08 GMT
#62
On June 29 2012 08:37 Existor wrote:
Cliff near 3rd? Like Lost Temple? You really want same mistake?

Except that cliff was over the natural. Usually by the time you take a 3rd you have the units or infrastructure to be able to defend a drop.
vibeo gane,
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-29 00:30:10
June 29 2012 00:28 GMT
#63
On June 29 2012 08:22 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2012 08:19 monitor wrote:
On June 29 2012 07:48 Broodie wrote:
On June 27 2012 14:01 prodiG wrote:
I will never, ever make a map cross only. Cross only is a bad bandaid solution to shitty map design.


I think this map needs a band-aid

Thinking cross only is stupid is in itself pretty stupid... Especially with 4 spawn maps, it's an element of the editor and it can broaden your maps ability to be played on, use it...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I would play this map enforced cross, but not in the state it's in now. gg


I don't like enforcing cross positions, and I don't think it is necessary on this map. However I will say that if your map is going to be bad 75% of the time instead of 0%, it makes sense to do the 0% by enforcing cross spawns. But ultimately it is better to just redesign the map as a 2p map or a working 4p map with no space restrictions.

There's also something to be said for designing a map knowing full well it will need spawn restrictions. Metropolis was specifically designed this way, and it's something we almost never do. Like I said, forcing spawns is not just about bad design, it can also be an element of good design.


Forcing spawns to "fix" a map is stupid. You can always just redesign your map, and we're not so hard up for maps that we need to make do with half-measures, even though it seems to go that way.

Suggesting forced cross positions on a 4player rotational is like saying: "I think your car would be better as a wagon, let's just take out the engine." Anything with 4 wheels on 2 axles would suffice, it makes no sense.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-29 00:40:17
June 29 2012 00:35 GMT
#64
On June 29 2012 08:22 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2012 08:19 monitor wrote:
On June 29 2012 07:48 Broodie wrote:
On June 27 2012 14:01 prodiG wrote:
I will never, ever make a map cross only. Cross only is a bad bandaid solution to shitty map design.


I think this map needs a band-aid

Thinking cross only is stupid is in itself pretty stupid... Especially with 4 spawn maps, it's an element of the editor and it can broaden your maps ability to be played on, use it...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I would play this map enforced cross, but not in the state it's in now. gg


I don't like enforcing cross positions, and I don't think it is necessary on this map. However I will say that if your map is going to be bad 75% of the time instead of 0%, it makes sense to do the 0% by enforcing cross spawns. But ultimately it is better to just redesign the map as a 2p map or a working 4p map with no space restrictions.

There's also something to be said for designing a map knowing full well it will need spawn restrictions. Metropolis was specifically designed this way, and it's something we almost never do. Like I said, forcing spawns is not just about bad design, it can also be an element of good design.


Oops, I thought you said Metalopolis:
+ Show Spoiler +
Lol... metalopolis was not designed to be cross only. It was so fucked up in close ground postions that they disabled them. Tournaments decided close air was imbalanced too, so they made it cross and additionally removed the golds. The map was NOT designed well. You might as well have designed the two other mains in cross position to be more interesting and promote harassment instead of just having a gigantic main wasting a quarter of the map space.


Anyway on Metropolis:
Again, I think this map wasn't designed well. First of all its basically a 2p map because the cross spawns are so similar (not even using different parts of the map like Antiga). Second there are 5 easy bases and a wasted main that is caused by the symmetry. Other than the terrible layout, the two useless mains could be redesigned to use the space more efficiently and discourage turtling (yay 200/200 deathballs 5k min 5k gas in the bank every game and nowhere to harass).

My only exception for cross spawns is when you have a 2-in-1 map like the TPW map and Superouman's map he made in the sc2 beta (I forgot both of the map names).
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-29 00:42:31
June 29 2012 00:40 GMT
#65
On June 29 2012 09:28 EatThePath wrote:
Forcing spawns to "fix" a map is stupid. You can always just redesign your map, and we're not so hard up for maps that we need to make do with half-measures, even though it seems to go that way.

Suggesting forced cross positions on a 4player rotational is like saying: "I think your car would be better as a wagon, let's just take out the engine." Anything with 4 wheels on 2 axles would suffice, it makes no sense.

Not what I'm saying. I'm saying you can design a map that takes advantage of forced spawns, to achieve layouts that are otherwise impossible. The obvious example here is 2-in-1 maps, but I think there's more to it than that. I agree with the notion with regard to normal rotational maps, however.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
June 29 2012 00:54 GMT
#66
Oh, yeah just quoting the conversation not directed at you. ^^
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Aunvilgod
Profile Joined December 2011
2653 Posts
June 29 2012 17:46 GMT
#67
I don´t like the natural textures at manmade cliffs. The rest is awesome quality as always.
ilovegroov | Blizzards mapmaker(s?) suck ass | #1 Protoss hater
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 17:49:51
July 17 2012 17:48 GMT
#68
Map updated to version 1.1!
Changelog - v1.1

-Added a ramp to the cliff overlooking the 3rd. This is to counter harassment from drops and air units and make the expansion more defensible.
-Added a short, narrow bridge connecting the main base to the 4th expansion. This is for units like Blink Stalkers and Reapers/Colossus to have easier access in and out of the main base, but is narrow enough to be easily defended against things like aggressive blink play or elevatoring units into the main base. - pic

See OP for more details!

+ Show Spoiler [Omnivium 1.1 Top-down] +
[image loading]
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
garlicface
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada4196 Posts
July 17 2012 18:07 GMT
#69
Big fan of the cliff/blink bridge. Hope this map gets its time to shine.
#TeamBuLba
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20342 Posts
July 17 2012 18:30 GMT
#70
Looks good, not first pick in any P matchup for me, but im noob
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
HypertonicHydroponic
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
437 Posts
July 17 2012 21:16 GMT
#71
So here's a quick question: do your rock/towers actually work as intended? I assume that you want the tower to only be activated if the rock is broken, right? But those look like 6x6 rocks which, as I've tested before and did again just now to confirm, are not quite large enough to prevent the tower activation (2.5 radius) by any ground unit M-moving to the rock. Did you modify the rock size, the tower capture radius, or do something else (, or does it actually not work as intended -- yet)? (No, I have not opened up the map on B.net yet to see what is actually the case.)

In my quest to solve this problem way back on Blockbuster (TL map contest), I wound up utilizing the alpha-braxis rocks in a ring around the tower since they have an AI that allows them to be broken together as if they were all one unit.
[P] The Watery Archives -- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=279070
oOOoOphidian
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1402 Posts
July 17 2012 21:21 GMT
#72
Clever design. I like that it allows for blink/reaper/elevator play, just without making it overly strong.
Creator of sc2unmasked.com
FakeSteve[TPR]
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Valhalla18444 Posts
July 17 2012 21:34 GMT
#73
your posts are so beautiful josh
Moderatormy tatsu loops r fuckin nice
FroznSmoke
Profile Joined July 2012
Germany8 Posts
July 17 2012 21:42 GMT
#74
Is there the possibility of this map being uploaded to the eu server? Even though it is still in beta i would like to play the map.
MarineKing Thorzain HasuObs
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 22:11:00
July 17 2012 22:07 GMT
#75
On July 18 2012 06:16 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
So here's a quick question: do your rock/towers actually work as intended? I assume that you want the tower to only be activated if the rock is broken, right? But those look like 6x6 rocks which, as I've tested before and did again just now to confirm, are not quite large enough to prevent the tower activation (2.5 radius) by any ground unit M-moving to the rock. Did you modify the rock size, the tower capture radius, or do something else (, or does it actually not work as intended -- yet)? (No, I have not opened up the map on B.net yet to see what is actually the case.)

In my quest to solve this problem way back on Blockbuster (TL map contest), I wound up utilizing the alpha-braxis rocks in a ring around the tower since they have an AI that allows them to be broken together as if they were all one unit.

I dropped the tower capture radius down to 1.5 (might have been 1?) - I don't see this as posing any issues since anyone who wants to take the Tower will just right click the tower anyway (I looked quite heavily at this when I was designing the original Destructible Xel'Naga tower on Destiny last year)

On July 18 2012 06:42 FroznSmoke wrote:
Is there the possibility of this map being uploaded to the eu server? Even though it is still in beta i would like to play the map.

I can look into this ;D

On July 18 2012 06:34 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
your posts are so beautiful josh

Not as beautiful as your face, Steve
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 22:10:51
July 17 2012 22:08 GMT
#76
double post fail
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
July 17 2012 22:22 GMT
#77
As Protoss player I see restricting the proper 3rd to only 1 geyser is pretty much a red flag to veto the map. There's really no reason for that, just like there's no reason to place rocks on the third. Thoughts? What is the reasoning behind restricting the easy third to 1 geyser?

Look at it this way: In PvZ it is hard enough as it is to secure a third, why would you lessen the gains from finally achieving this? Protoss basically has no reason to do anything but 2 base builds because the 3rd with normal geysers is too hard to hold, and the 3rd with 1 geyser doesn't pay off. Another example: In PvT you need AoE or you lose. In PvT you typically get colossus first, which can be done on 2 bases. Once Vikings are fielded, you are in the process of getting your 3rd so you can also make Templar to be able to fight cost-effectively; this map cuts your ability to win in the later stages of the game because the lack of gas makes useful unit counts (either HT or Colossus or Stalkers) lower compared to Terran, who has other ways to mitigate the lack of a 6th geyser on the easy 3rd.
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
oOOoOphidian
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1402 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 22:37:02
July 17 2012 22:32 GMT
#78
On July 18 2012 07:22 tehemperorer wrote:
As Protoss player I see restricting the proper 3rd to only 1 geyser is pretty much a red flag to veto the map. There's really no reason for that, just like there's no reason to place rocks on the third. Thoughts? What is the reasoning behind restricting the easy third to 1 geyser?

Look at it this way: In PvZ it is hard enough as it is to secure a third, why would you lessen the gains from finally achieving this? Protoss basically has no reason to do anything but 2 base builds because the 3rd with normal geysers is too hard to hold, and the 3rd with 1 geyser doesn't pay off. Another example: In PvT you need AoE or you lose. In PvT you typically get colossus first, which can be done on 2 bases. Once Vikings are fielded, you are in the process of getting your 3rd so you can also make Templar to be able to fight cost-effectively; this map cuts your ability to win in the later stages of the game because the lack of gas makes useful unit counts (either HT or Colossus or Stalkers) lower compared to Terran, who has other ways to mitigate the lack of a 6th geyser on the easy 3rd.

The third base here is extremely easy to secure. You can just camp your army and defend all three bases from ground units. The reduced gas makes it so you can't just sit there on 3 base and get a ridiculous gas army with no danger or effort required. Even entombed valley has a harder to defend 3rd/natural, as you have to split your army.

Also, you read the map description in the OP, right? What you are complaining about is the entire purpose of the map. This will probably be a good map for terran as you said, with less need for the gas and difficulty dealing with 6-8 geyser zerg and protoss. Given how terran is having many problems in this patch, introducing a map that changes some things up would be great and it's not at all as terran favored as Antiga.
Creator of sc2unmasked.com
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
July 17 2012 22:36 GMT
#79
On July 18 2012 07:22 tehemperorer wrote:
As Protoss player I see restricting the proper 3rd to only 1 geyser is pretty much a red flag to veto the map. There's really no reason for that, just like there's no reason to place rocks on the third. Thoughts? What is the reasoning behind restricting the easy third to 1 geyser?

Look at it this way: In PvZ it is hard enough as it is to secure a third, why would you lessen the gains from finally achieving this? Protoss basically has no reason to do anything but 2 base builds because the 3rd with normal geysers is too hard to hold, and the 3rd with 1 geyser doesn't pay off. Another example: In PvT you need AoE or you lose. In PvT you typically get colossus first, which can be done on 2 bases. Once Vikings are fielded, you are in the process of getting your 3rd so you can also make Templar to be able to fight cost-effectively; this map cuts your ability to win in the later stages of the game because the lack of gas makes useful unit counts (either HT or Colossus or Stalkers) lower compared to Terran, who has other ways to mitigate the lack of a 6th geyser on the easy 3rd.

The concept of the map is that if you want more than five geysers, you have to move out on the map and take the middle expansions. In order to secure them, you have to position your army aggressively, as opposed to straddling your three bases right up next to your main base. Nothing says you have to take the 5m1g expansion at all, let alone as your 3rd (I personally take it as my 4th usually). I simply don't have enough testing data yet to be able to say for certain whether the 3rds as they are are a distinct problem.
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
nicotn
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands186 Posts
July 18 2012 00:25 GMT
#80
I like the ridges in the back of the third, it reminds me of Condemned Ridge.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Weekly
11:00
WardiTV Mondays #97
IntoTheiNu 222
WardiTV66
Rex21
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko212
ProTech75
Rex 21
Zoun (SOOP) 17
SHIN 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 9745
Shuttle 1107
Bisu 1066
actioN 834
firebathero 495
BeSt 408
PianO 393
Jaedong 345
Mini 288
ZerO 183
[ Show more ]
Leta 160
Hyun 159
Light 148
EffOrt 108
Pusan 106
Sharp 75
JulyZerg 64
JYJ 54
Mind 50
Stork 46
Free 37
soO 29
Killer 26
yabsab 21
sorry 17
Hm[arnc] 17
Barracks 14
Sacsri 13
Shine 3
Sexy 1
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss1260
byalli548
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King160
Other Games
summit1g6776
singsing1469
Pyrionflax280
crisheroes267
Happy227
Fuzer 162
XaKoH 151
B2W.Neo86
ZerO(Twitch)21
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH315
• StrangeGG 83
• LUISG 12
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV397
League of Legends
• Stunt370
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
4h 58m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
22h 58m
INu's Battles
23h 58m
Cure vs herO
ByuN vs Rogue
PiGosaur Cup
1d 12h
The PondCast
1d 22h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 23h
Patches Events
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Escore
3 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Solar vs Lambo
WardiTV Summer Champion…
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Clem vs Serral
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4
SCTL 2026 Spring
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W5
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #2
Acropolis #5
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Acropolis #5 - TRS
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Light Tournament 2026
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.