• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:46
CET 21:46
KST 05:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy7ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool48Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat Mutation # 516 Specter of Death
Brood War
General
RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site ASL21 General Discussion KK Platform will provide 1 million CNY Recent recommended BW games Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group C [ASL21] Ro24 Group B [ASL21] Ro24 Group A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Darkest Dungeon Path of Exile
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1625 users

[M] (4) Omnivium by prodiG - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
June 28 2012 23:37 GMT
#61
Cliff near 3rd? Like Lost Temple? You really want same mistake?
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2142 Posts
June 29 2012 00:08 GMT
#62
On June 29 2012 08:37 Existor wrote:
Cliff near 3rd? Like Lost Temple? You really want same mistake?

Except that cliff was over the natural. Usually by the time you take a 3rd you have the units or infrastructure to be able to defend a drop.
vibeo gane,
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-29 00:30:10
June 29 2012 00:28 GMT
#63
On June 29 2012 08:22 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2012 08:19 monitor wrote:
On June 29 2012 07:48 Broodie wrote:
On June 27 2012 14:01 prodiG wrote:
I will never, ever make a map cross only. Cross only is a bad bandaid solution to shitty map design.


I think this map needs a band-aid

Thinking cross only is stupid is in itself pretty stupid... Especially with 4 spawn maps, it's an element of the editor and it can broaden your maps ability to be played on, use it...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I would play this map enforced cross, but not in the state it's in now. gg


I don't like enforcing cross positions, and I don't think it is necessary on this map. However I will say that if your map is going to be bad 75% of the time instead of 0%, it makes sense to do the 0% by enforcing cross spawns. But ultimately it is better to just redesign the map as a 2p map or a working 4p map with no space restrictions.

There's also something to be said for designing a map knowing full well it will need spawn restrictions. Metropolis was specifically designed this way, and it's something we almost never do. Like I said, forcing spawns is not just about bad design, it can also be an element of good design.


Forcing spawns to "fix" a map is stupid. You can always just redesign your map, and we're not so hard up for maps that we need to make do with half-measures, even though it seems to go that way.

Suggesting forced cross positions on a 4player rotational is like saying: "I think your car would be better as a wagon, let's just take out the engine." Anything with 4 wheels on 2 axles would suffice, it makes no sense.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-29 00:40:17
June 29 2012 00:35 GMT
#64
On June 29 2012 08:22 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 29 2012 08:19 monitor wrote:
On June 29 2012 07:48 Broodie wrote:
On June 27 2012 14:01 prodiG wrote:
I will never, ever make a map cross only. Cross only is a bad bandaid solution to shitty map design.


I think this map needs a band-aid

Thinking cross only is stupid is in itself pretty stupid... Especially with 4 spawn maps, it's an element of the editor and it can broaden your maps ability to be played on, use it...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I would play this map enforced cross, but not in the state it's in now. gg


I don't like enforcing cross positions, and I don't think it is necessary on this map. However I will say that if your map is going to be bad 75% of the time instead of 0%, it makes sense to do the 0% by enforcing cross spawns. But ultimately it is better to just redesign the map as a 2p map or a working 4p map with no space restrictions.

There's also something to be said for designing a map knowing full well it will need spawn restrictions. Metropolis was specifically designed this way, and it's something we almost never do. Like I said, forcing spawns is not just about bad design, it can also be an element of good design.


Oops, I thought you said Metalopolis:
+ Show Spoiler +
Lol... metalopolis was not designed to be cross only. It was so fucked up in close ground postions that they disabled them. Tournaments decided close air was imbalanced too, so they made it cross and additionally removed the golds. The map was NOT designed well. You might as well have designed the two other mains in cross position to be more interesting and promote harassment instead of just having a gigantic main wasting a quarter of the map space.


Anyway on Metropolis:
Again, I think this map wasn't designed well. First of all its basically a 2p map because the cross spawns are so similar (not even using different parts of the map like Antiga). Second there are 5 easy bases and a wasted main that is caused by the symmetry. Other than the terrible layout, the two useless mains could be redesigned to use the space more efficiently and discourage turtling (yay 200/200 deathballs 5k min 5k gas in the bank every game and nowhere to harass).

My only exception for cross spawns is when you have a 2-in-1 map like the TPW map and Superouman's map he made in the sc2 beta (I forgot both of the map names).
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-29 00:42:31
June 29 2012 00:40 GMT
#65
On June 29 2012 09:28 EatThePath wrote:
Forcing spawns to "fix" a map is stupid. You can always just redesign your map, and we're not so hard up for maps that we need to make do with half-measures, even though it seems to go that way.

Suggesting forced cross positions on a 4player rotational is like saying: "I think your car would be better as a wagon, let's just take out the engine." Anything with 4 wheels on 2 axles would suffice, it makes no sense.

Not what I'm saying. I'm saying you can design a map that takes advantage of forced spawns, to achieve layouts that are otherwise impossible. The obvious example here is 2-in-1 maps, but I think there's more to it than that. I agree with the notion with regard to normal rotational maps, however.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
June 29 2012 00:54 GMT
#66
Oh, yeah just quoting the conversation not directed at you. ^^
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Aunvilgod
Profile Joined December 2011
2653 Posts
June 29 2012 17:46 GMT
#67
I don´t like the natural textures at manmade cliffs. The rest is awesome quality as always.
ilovegroov | Blizzards mapmaker(s?) suck ass | #1 Protoss hater
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 17:49:51
July 17 2012 17:48 GMT
#68
Map updated to version 1.1!
Changelog - v1.1

-Added a ramp to the cliff overlooking the 3rd. This is to counter harassment from drops and air units and make the expansion more defensible.
-Added a short, narrow bridge connecting the main base to the 4th expansion. This is for units like Blink Stalkers and Reapers/Colossus to have easier access in and out of the main base, but is narrow enough to be easily defended against things like aggressive blink play or elevatoring units into the main base. - pic

See OP for more details!

+ Show Spoiler [Omnivium 1.1 Top-down] +
[image loading]
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
garlicface
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada4196 Posts
July 17 2012 18:07 GMT
#69
Big fan of the cliff/blink bridge. Hope this map gets its time to shine.
#TeamBuLba
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20326 Posts
July 17 2012 18:30 GMT
#70
Looks good, not first pick in any P matchup for me, but im noob
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
HypertonicHydroponic
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
437 Posts
July 17 2012 21:16 GMT
#71
So here's a quick question: do your rock/towers actually work as intended? I assume that you want the tower to only be activated if the rock is broken, right? But those look like 6x6 rocks which, as I've tested before and did again just now to confirm, are not quite large enough to prevent the tower activation (2.5 radius) by any ground unit M-moving to the rock. Did you modify the rock size, the tower capture radius, or do something else (, or does it actually not work as intended -- yet)? (No, I have not opened up the map on B.net yet to see what is actually the case.)

In my quest to solve this problem way back on Blockbuster (TL map contest), I wound up utilizing the alpha-braxis rocks in a ring around the tower since they have an AI that allows them to be broken together as if they were all one unit.
[P] The Watery Archives -- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=279070
oOOoOphidian
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1402 Posts
July 17 2012 21:21 GMT
#72
Clever design. I like that it allows for blink/reaper/elevator play, just without making it overly strong.
Creator of sc2unmasked.com
FakeSteve[TPR]
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Valhalla18444 Posts
July 17 2012 21:34 GMT
#73
your posts are so beautiful josh
Moderatormy tatsu loops r fuckin nice
FroznSmoke
Profile Joined July 2012
Germany8 Posts
July 17 2012 21:42 GMT
#74
Is there the possibility of this map being uploaded to the eu server? Even though it is still in beta i would like to play the map.
MarineKing Thorzain HasuObs
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 22:11:00
July 17 2012 22:07 GMT
#75
On July 18 2012 06:16 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
So here's a quick question: do your rock/towers actually work as intended? I assume that you want the tower to only be activated if the rock is broken, right? But those look like 6x6 rocks which, as I've tested before and did again just now to confirm, are not quite large enough to prevent the tower activation (2.5 radius) by any ground unit M-moving to the rock. Did you modify the rock size, the tower capture radius, or do something else (, or does it actually not work as intended -- yet)? (No, I have not opened up the map on B.net yet to see what is actually the case.)

In my quest to solve this problem way back on Blockbuster (TL map contest), I wound up utilizing the alpha-braxis rocks in a ring around the tower since they have an AI that allows them to be broken together as if they were all one unit.

I dropped the tower capture radius down to 1.5 (might have been 1?) - I don't see this as posing any issues since anyone who wants to take the Tower will just right click the tower anyway (I looked quite heavily at this when I was designing the original Destructible Xel'Naga tower on Destiny last year)

On July 18 2012 06:42 FroznSmoke wrote:
Is there the possibility of this map being uploaded to the eu server? Even though it is still in beta i would like to play the map.

I can look into this ;D

On July 18 2012 06:34 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
your posts are so beautiful josh

Not as beautiful as your face, Steve
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 22:10:51
July 17 2012 22:08 GMT
#76
double post fail
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
tehemperorer
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2183 Posts
July 17 2012 22:22 GMT
#77
As Protoss player I see restricting the proper 3rd to only 1 geyser is pretty much a red flag to veto the map. There's really no reason for that, just like there's no reason to place rocks on the third. Thoughts? What is the reasoning behind restricting the easy third to 1 geyser?

Look at it this way: In PvZ it is hard enough as it is to secure a third, why would you lessen the gains from finally achieving this? Protoss basically has no reason to do anything but 2 base builds because the 3rd with normal geysers is too hard to hold, and the 3rd with 1 geyser doesn't pay off. Another example: In PvT you need AoE or you lose. In PvT you typically get colossus first, which can be done on 2 bases. Once Vikings are fielded, you are in the process of getting your 3rd so you can also make Templar to be able to fight cost-effectively; this map cuts your ability to win in the later stages of the game because the lack of gas makes useful unit counts (either HT or Colossus or Stalkers) lower compared to Terran, who has other ways to mitigate the lack of a 6th geyser on the easy 3rd.
Knowing is half the battle... the other half is lasers.
oOOoOphidian
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1402 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-17 22:37:02
July 17 2012 22:32 GMT
#78
On July 18 2012 07:22 tehemperorer wrote:
As Protoss player I see restricting the proper 3rd to only 1 geyser is pretty much a red flag to veto the map. There's really no reason for that, just like there's no reason to place rocks on the third. Thoughts? What is the reasoning behind restricting the easy third to 1 geyser?

Look at it this way: In PvZ it is hard enough as it is to secure a third, why would you lessen the gains from finally achieving this? Protoss basically has no reason to do anything but 2 base builds because the 3rd with normal geysers is too hard to hold, and the 3rd with 1 geyser doesn't pay off. Another example: In PvT you need AoE or you lose. In PvT you typically get colossus first, which can be done on 2 bases. Once Vikings are fielded, you are in the process of getting your 3rd so you can also make Templar to be able to fight cost-effectively; this map cuts your ability to win in the later stages of the game because the lack of gas makes useful unit counts (either HT or Colossus or Stalkers) lower compared to Terran, who has other ways to mitigate the lack of a 6th geyser on the easy 3rd.

The third base here is extremely easy to secure. You can just camp your army and defend all three bases from ground units. The reduced gas makes it so you can't just sit there on 3 base and get a ridiculous gas army with no danger or effort required. Even entombed valley has a harder to defend 3rd/natural, as you have to split your army.

Also, you read the map description in the OP, right? What you are complaining about is the entire purpose of the map. This will probably be a good map for terran as you said, with less need for the gas and difficulty dealing with 6-8 geyser zerg and protoss. Given how terran is having many problems in this patch, introducing a map that changes some things up would be great and it's not at all as terran favored as Antiga.
Creator of sc2unmasked.com
prodiG
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2016 Posts
July 17 2012 22:36 GMT
#79
On July 18 2012 07:22 tehemperorer wrote:
As Protoss player I see restricting the proper 3rd to only 1 geyser is pretty much a red flag to veto the map. There's really no reason for that, just like there's no reason to place rocks on the third. Thoughts? What is the reasoning behind restricting the easy third to 1 geyser?

Look at it this way: In PvZ it is hard enough as it is to secure a third, why would you lessen the gains from finally achieving this? Protoss basically has no reason to do anything but 2 base builds because the 3rd with normal geysers is too hard to hold, and the 3rd with 1 geyser doesn't pay off. Another example: In PvT you need AoE or you lose. In PvT you typically get colossus first, which can be done on 2 bases. Once Vikings are fielded, you are in the process of getting your 3rd so you can also make Templar to be able to fight cost-effectively; this map cuts your ability to win in the later stages of the game because the lack of gas makes useful unit counts (either HT or Colossus or Stalkers) lower compared to Terran, who has other ways to mitigate the lack of a 6th geyser on the easy 3rd.

The concept of the map is that if you want more than five geysers, you have to move out on the map and take the middle expansions. In order to secure them, you have to position your army aggressively, as opposed to straddling your three bases right up next to your main base. Nothing says you have to take the 5m1g expansion at all, let alone as your 3rd (I personally take it as my 4th usually). I simply don't have enough testing data yet to be able to say for certain whether the 3rds as they are are a distinct problem.
ESV Mapmaking Team || http://twitter.com/prodiGsc || Real talk, I don't have time to sugar-coat it for you sir
nicotn
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands186 Posts
July 18 2012 00:25 GMT
#80
I like the ridges in the back of the third, it reminds me of Condemned Ridge.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL
20:00
S22 - Ladder Tour #3
ZZZero.O112
LiquipediaDiscussion
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
15:30
FSL s10 FINALS! PTB vs POG
Freeedom78
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft424
LamboSC2 275
SteadfastSC 66
Vindicta 45
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 18184
Mini 783
EffOrt 511
Shuttle 327
ZZZero.O 132
Soulkey 117
firebathero 104
hero 57
IntoTheRainbow 11
NaDa 7
Dota 2
Gorgc8664
Counter-Strike
byalli1140
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox361
AZ_Axe62
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor572
Liquid`Hasu492
Other Games
summit1g7393
tarik_tv3406
Grubby1989
Beastyqt642
ArmadaUGS542
KnowMe338
mouzStarbuck175
Trikslyr58
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2014
StarCraft 2
angryscii 29
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 35
• davetesta18
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota242
League of Legends
• Jankos1750
Other Games
• imaqtpie1098
• Scarra573
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
13h 15m
ByuN vs Maru
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
WardiTV Team League
15h 15m
BSL
22h 15m
Replay Cast
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 12h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 13h
Light vs Calm
Royal vs Mind
Wardi Open
1d 14h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 19h
OSC
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
BSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-27
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
2026 Changsha Offline CUP
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
NationLESS Cup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.