TSL Ladder Rankings - Page 27
Forum Index > Razer TSL Forum |
![]()
Chill
Calgary25962 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
| ||
sasal
Germany74 Posts
| ||
ZpuX
Sweden1230 Posts
| ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
| ||
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
On April 22 2008 04:36 sasal wrote: When someone just plays a weaker clanmate up to 7 times in a row to farm points and has sucess with this method you must say it is like a punch in the face of all people who played randomly others which they didnt know and also didnt know that they are weaker to them. Thats beside of exact rule or abuse definitions and it is sad that people try to use every gape to take advantage compared to others. #2 so fcking much.. and @ Incontrol : Why do you call me moron ? Maybe i didnt explain my thought clearly enough. I was for sure not talking about a ladder running for 3-4 weeks and then being randomly ended in a time span between 2 weeks or 1 hour.. more like this : The same as TSL LADDER except that there isnt a countdown or a last day. Maybe they could have announced that the ladder from now on will take from 1 Day up to 3 days. For sure its no good solution either.. maybe even not viable.. but i dont think the idea is that absurd or that bad. Not by any means a reason to call me a moron. I know there must be and there probably are better solutions.. and the admins looking at the game lists and veryfying if it was abuse or not is one.. But as you realized yourself already.. if playing 4-8 games vs your friend is not abusing then its fucked up anyway for people who didnt do so , isnt it ? On the one hand we have the players who will say it was no abuse it was legit and in a way they are simply right but on the other hand we have the players who are out now and in my opinion they are also right : By playing a friend or a random opponent and gaining 4-8 wins in a row at the last time possible.. they do something thats at least not fair.. I know my idea with the 'viable ladder ending/ not being anounced ' is quite insane and not a good solution but dont call me stupid anyways... and im no bastard | ||
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
I didn't make it! lol | ||
Boblion
France8043 Posts
On April 22 2008 05:09 MYM.Testie wrote: o shi! I didn't make it! lol you deserve to die ![]() | ||
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
why 1 point ! sup! | ||
Boblion
France8043 Posts
![]() + Show Spoiler + kidding, i have big respect for you Testie, like Nazgul, Leg, Eriador you showed that even after a long period of inactivity you are still very good. Being #48 or 49 doesnt really matter for us. | ||
stalife
Canada1222 Posts
For all those who dont want their tsl iccup accounts anymore and dont want to play bw again or lost interest, etc. etc.., feel free to send me your ID and pw and ill make sure those stats are transferred to 50CaL.Stalife or my many akas on iccup. | ||
NoNameLoser
United States1508 Posts
| ||
geno
United States1404 Posts
![]() | ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
On April 22 2008 04:58 MaGic~PhiL wrote: #2 so fcking much.. and @ Incontrol : Why do you call me moron ? Maybe i didnt explain my thought clearly enough. I was for sure not talking about a ladder running for 3-4 weeks and then being randomly ended in a time span between 2 weeks or 1 hour.. more like this : The same as TSL LADDER except that there isnt a countdown or a last day. Maybe they could have announced that the ladder from now on will take from 1 Day up to 3 days. For sure its no good solution either.. maybe even not viable.. but i dont think the idea is that absurd or that bad. Not by any means a reason to call me a moron. I know there must be and there probably are better solutions.. and the admins looking at the game lists and veryfying if it was abuse or not is one.. But as you realized yourself already.. if playing 4-8 games vs your friend is not abusing then its fucked up anyway for people who didnt do so , isnt it ? On the one hand we have the players who will say it was no abuse it was legit and in a way they are simply right but on the other hand we have the players who are out now and in my opinion they are also right : By playing a friend or a random opponent and gaining 4-8 wins in a row at the last time possible.. they do something thats at least not fair.. I know my idea with the 'viable ladder ending/ not being anounced ' is quite insane and not a good solution but dont call me stupid anyways... and im no bastard So.. you offer an alternative idea that you yourself admit is probably not better, or viable.. but it is an option... and you dont think that is moronic? The fact you don't see that by yourself.. even after you admitted it was bad/unviable advice to begin with is.. well, confirming my statement. | ||
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
still we cant be satisfied with the way it went at the very end now in the end.. basicaly im just interested in how the admins decide these cases | ||
![]()
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
| ||
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
| ||
![]()
Legionnaire
Australia4514 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
| ||
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
| ||
| ||