|
On June 06 2009 17:26 AttackZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2009 17:02 jtype wrote:
The Metagame includes anything that takes place outside of the existing ruleset. actually that has nothing to do with starcraft at all. wrong.
Lol!! Don't 'wrong' me! That is exactly what the definition of 'metagaming' is. If you don't agree then you don't understand the word.
edit - Actually, I should expand on that. I don't mean that Metagaming is when people break the rules, as such, but rather when people go outside of the rules as prescribed by the creators of the game. The scope of this is very wide. It can include such things as trying to gain a psychological advantage with constant harassment, confusing your enemy with 'ninja' expansions, stacking units, etc.
|
|
|
This is an amazingly grand effort guys, huge thanks to all of you!
Hopefully I can lift my game to the point where I can more consistently contribute here.
|
United States44393 Posts
On June 06 2009 22:49 jtype wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2009 17:26 AttackZerg wrote:On June 06 2009 17:02 jtype wrote:
The Metagame includes anything that takes place outside of the existing ruleset. actually that has nothing to do with starcraft at all. wrong. Lol!! Don't 'wrong' me! That is exactly what the definition of 'metagaming' is. If you don't agree then you don't understand the word. edit - Actually, I should expand on that. I don't mean that Metagaming is when people break the rules, as such, but rather when people go outside of the rules as prescribed by the creators of the game. The scope of this is very wide. It can include such things as trying to gain a psychological advantage with constant harassment, confusing your enemy with 'ninja' expansions, stacking units, etc.
This is what I thought because of my literal interpretation of the word meta. However the general consensus is that the term means something else and until we get a gaming dictionary we should follow the consensus to try and avoid confusion.
|
gah! when is this going up!?!
|
wondering as well! awesome stuff though.
to put it in tasteless words: i'm so pumped to see it in action, tlnet are such ballers!
|
I think 12 more hours? 36 hours from when the thread is made would equal 12 hours from now?
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
hahah we don't work on timelines. We work on whenever programmers have time to put it up lol.
|
On June 07 2009 00:05 Kwark wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2009 22:49 jtype wrote:On June 06 2009 17:26 AttackZerg wrote:On June 06 2009 17:02 jtype wrote:
The Metagame includes anything that takes place outside of the existing ruleset. actually that has nothing to do with starcraft at all. wrong. Lol!! Don't 'wrong' me! That is exactly what the definition of 'metagaming' is. If you don't agree then you don't understand the word. edit - Actually, I should expand on that. I don't mean that Metagaming is when people break the rules, as such, but rather when people go outside of the rules as prescribed by the creators of the game. The scope of this is very wide. It can include such things as trying to gain a psychological advantage with constant harassment, confusing your enemy with 'ninja' expansions, stacking units, etc. This is what I thought because of my literal interpretation of the word meta. However the general consensus is that the term means something else and until we get a gaming dictionary we should follow the consensus to try and avoid confusion.
Oh ok. Well, all the definitions that I've heard of the word are along similar lines to the one that I mentioned, but if there is a general consensus of accepting different one, then that's fair enough.
Although, it would be nice to hear a bit more of an explanation of the "correct" definition here on TL, instead of the rather insulting "wrong" that I was presented with.
|
On June 07 2009 01:26 Kennigit wrote:
hahah we don't work on timelines. We work on whenever programmers have time to put it up lol.
Liquipedia will go online for you to access in approximately 36 hours
A political promise =P
|
thanks
really appreciate it; starcraft is a hard game and i'm a noob at it, and this will really help
|
On June 06 2009 00:43 Plexa wrote:
Liquipedia has been a project that has been worked on by Teamliquid for the past 20 months. It has taken longer than any other project to complete to date. There are a number of forum veterans who were absolutely essential to the completion of Liquipedia - these users will be rewarded with a Liquipedia Icon to replace their regular unit icon. They are:
- Aesop
- cgrinker
- GHOSTCLAW
- Mikeymoo
On behalf of the Teamliquid staff I would like to thank you for the countless hours you have put into Liquipedia over the past months. In addition to those four users, a number of other users have contributed and they are;
- fusionsdf
- Highways
- Kwark
- littlechava
- -orb-
- Ver
- AttackZerg
- Oystein
You 12 are heroes, and deserve a parade. Annually.
|
This brought a tear to my eye. I love teamliquid.
|
United States11393 Posts
On June 07 2009 02:04 dhe95 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2009 01:26 Kennigit wrote:
hahah we don't work on timelines. We work on whenever programmers have time to put it up lol. A political promise =P
A) approximately
B) haven't you watched a TL stream before?
|
Great work guys. This will be HUGE for our community.
|
Less than 8 hours left. Cant wait T_T
|
United States17042 Posts
it's a wiki - we'll never be ready, because the wiki will never be done ^^
|
omg sooo nice!
thanks a lot
|
United States44393 Posts
Also MoC is trolling me in the building pages. :p
|
WoW!!! realy big props to TL for this <3
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
