Hmm.. I think I'm understanding the situation more. And it looks like it's the fault of OGN and MBC for giving KeSPA too much power. They should have created an organization that just keeps track of pro gamers' records in reputable tournaments -- just that, no more. By allowing KeSPA to organize the tournaments, OGN and MBC brought this upon themselves.
Now, I'm starting to wonder why OGN and MBC aren't just breaking their ties with KeSPA and start fresh. Maybe because it'll ruin e-sports? >__<
Those folks in Korea probably know a heck of a lot more than me in business management so I'm sure their decision was the right one (I hope, anyway).
On March 08 2007 17:34 muramasa wrote: I'm glad that the ProLeague is going to be coming back, but I'm fairly sure this is a bad thing for pro gaming, long term.
I don't know how profitable OGN and MBCgame are (obviously), but having to buy the broadcast rights from KeSPA is going to cut into that profitability. I hope we don't see a decrease in production values or, even worse, a loss of interest in pro gaming by the broadcasters parent companies.
I have absolutely no proof, but I think OGN and MBC have been raking in too much money with ProLeague. The fact that they have accepted the offer means that there are still tons of profits to be realized even after paying the fees. The introduction of new competition can only do good for the whole e-sports community. All the companies will try to be better than others, offer more attractive features, etc. Who wins? The consumers ^^ Even if OGN and MBC give up Pro League, other companies will be able to take their place (I'm not guaranteeing it will be as good) and continue the development of e-sports.
I don't think it's a matter of OGN and MBC making "too much profit" so much as it was their crappy negotiating position. Through slight of hand KeSPA "got the rights" to broadcast the proleague that OGN and MBC ran and then sold off those rights, and now the new company is making OGN and MBC pay to broadcast the pro league that they created and run, even if KeSPA provides more than superficial assistance.
This doesn't create more competition. It puts the broadcast rights in the hands of one company who can do whatever it damn well pleases with them. The old system worked. The companies that make the tournament have incentive to do a good job broadcasting it. And with multiple tournaments each tournament creator is going to do the best tournament they can. Merging the OGN and MBC proleagues was not a good thing IMO, and now the ability to broadcast them is in the hands of one company.
The consumer got fucked, hard. As did OGN, MBC, and all of pro gaming.
According to the IEG guy, "KeSPA is and has been in charge of Proleague for awhile."
As I understand it, based on the FiFo translations and the news thread:
MBC and OGN had their own team leagues. They merged to form Voltron Proleague with KeSPA's help, and at some point (at the beginning?) KeSPA took over pretty much all the responsibilities except for broadcasting, which they left to MBC and OGN.
MBC and OGN are both represented on KeSPA's board. KeSPA is not stealing from them. They objected because they didn't like the idea of paying for what they've been getting for free.
Now the league (run by KeSPA) is fully independent of the broadcasters (and their respective pro teams), which makes everything more "professional".
The compromise they agreed to is that MBC and OGN will now pay for broadcasting rights, but they are guaranteed to be the primary Proleague broadcasters for the next 3 years.
I think you're right, if not, at least on the right track. Now, I think OGN and MBC made a bad decision to give too much power to KeSPA (i.e. allowing them to organize the tournament) because now it's that much harder to separate themselves from it.
KeSPA seems like exactly the right group to be running Proleague. As far as I know, every team sponsor (which includes OGN and MBC) has a spot on the board. I don't know who else does though.
On March 08 2007 20:03 SonuvBob wrote: KeSPA seems like exactly the right group to be running Proleague. As far as I know, every team sponsor (which includes OGN and MBC) has a spot on the board. I don't know who else does though.
I made a mistake while copying & pasting from MSWord D: Corrected part:
1)First Negotiation •Demands exclusive broadcasting rights for cable and satellite TV •Accepts IEG’s rights on additional broadcasting material •IEG and the two companies (OGN and MBC) cooperate to create a new ProLeague enterprise
lol it took me like 2 minutes to find out that this thread was moved to News >__< "zOMG where did my beautiful thread go?"
So that means SC will stay alive for at least 3 more years? XD
Anyways, I think as long as Kespa pays for all the production and OGN/MBC only does the broadcasting, everything is fine. I originally thought Kespa wanted OGN/MBC to do the broadcasting AND pay for all the production costs while paying Kespa -.-