EPTSQ Leaderboard by Region - Page 10
| Forum Index > News |
|
oldahe
Austria534 Posts
| ||
|
Deckkie
Netherlands1595 Posts
I would love to see the SQ between MUs. A player should get a higher SQ when his income rate is higher. Taking in consideration that players can macro well with every income they have, players should not be able to get very high SQ when playing ZvZ (their income just isnt high enough to get a high SQ). Would like to see if PvP has lower SQ because of low eco play than other MUs (this could also explain HuK and MC scoring low on MLG, they has mostly PvP games) PS. Maybe I do the math wrong, but dont think so. | ||
|
alepov
Netherlands1132 Posts
| ||
|
Deadeight
United Kingdom1629 Posts
| ||
|
Deadeight
United Kingdom1629 Posts
On October 29 2011 20:15 alepov wrote: You gotta remember that goody's money is low cos he has 4 thors queued up per factory lol. It's funny but it's actually not a bad point. Shame there isn't a way to access the replay files and include queued units in unspent resources. | ||
|
Fusil
Germany20 Posts
 | ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
in avg im better than most korean pros ^^ | ||
|
Hypoxia
United States31 Posts
| ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
but wow im TOTALLY confused by the axes. What does the left axis with the games mean? Please some give me an example on how to read a graph. Isnt the games number just the sample size? That shouldn't be in the graph as one of the axes then. Im totally confused, please help lol :D | ||
|
alepov
Netherlands1132 Posts
On October 29 2011 20:39 MasterReY wrote: First of all: great article, good effort, but wow im TOTALLY confused by the axes. What does the left axis with the games mean? Please some give me an example on how to read a graph. Isnt the games number just the sample size? That shouldn't be in the graph as one of the axes then. Im totally confused, please help lol :D the amount of games with the corresponding SQ. So, for example, ToD has submitted 15 games with 90 SQ | ||
|
PopcornColonel
United States769 Posts
| ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
On October 29 2011 20:46 alepov wrote: the amount of games with the corresponding SQ. So, for example, ToD has submitted 15 games with 90 SQ Yeah i thought of that too, but by that logic he also submitted 10 games with SQ 85 and 95 ??? Makes no sense t-t | ||
|
alepov
Netherlands1132 Posts
On October 29 2011 20:52 MasterReY wrote: Yeah i thought of that too, but by that logic he also submitted 10 games with SQ 85 and 95 ??? Makes no sense t-t No, you can see the points where the graph changes steepness, the rest is just a fit. So he also submitted ~6 games with ~82 and ~5 games with ~98. (on the EU graph) | ||
|
TheBamf
Denmark366 Posts
| ||
|
Shounen
Brazil20 Posts
| ||
|
dzovan
Serbia37 Posts
On October 29 2011 11:11 Whitewing wrote: One issue I have: Zergs, when going for muta builds, deliberately pool resources and float them for a while before the mutas come out, which raises their average unspent resources a fair bit. Going for infesters they float a lot of gas as well, etc. Protoss play a heavy gateway style often will gain 600+ minerals and a bunch of gas too before their warp gates come off cooldown and then they burn them all at once. That would raise their average unspent resources. Terran is the only race that doesn't float a lot of resources by design. One should compare the metric between people playing the same race, but not compare across different races. I concur. | ||
|
JoeAWESOME
Sweden1080 Posts
| ||
|
Eufouria
United Kingdom4425 Posts
edit: I also thought it was interesting how IdrA really seems to turn it on for tournaments. I was disappointed with his score on the ladder, considering that his reputation is as one of the best macro Zergs in the world, but seeing his score at MLG, particularly against Bomber you can see that he certainly does deserve his reputation. | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
it also confirms what I knew before: Demuslim is a damn macro monster! | ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
On October 29 2011 20:57 alepov wrote: No, you can see the points where the graph changes steepness, the rest is just a fit. So he also submitted ~6 games with ~82 and ~5 games with ~98. (on the EU graph) So ToD submitted 15 games with SQ of 90, 6 games with SQ of 82, 5 games with SQ of 98 and 1 game with SQ of 106. So he submitted 27 games overall (for EU graph)? I guess it makes some sense, but it just feels kind of unnecessary. Anyways thanks^^ | ||
| ||
