|
On March 20 2008 09:30 ahrara_ wrote:Show nested quote +Also, why is everyone so confident that Ace and randombum are clean? While Ace's plan is pretty good, that shouldn't guarantee his innocence. We're not, Ace is voted because he has a plan of action that will benefit the town even if he were say mafia. Bum is just voted to kick Emp off because of his irrational approach to being elected. I have a concern with Ace's plan:
suppose that the mayor is townie and all the bodyguards get the right messages
then suppose that a mafia false claims that hes a bodyguard.
that means we'll end up killing several bodyguards and potentially the mayor for a mafiaso. not a good trade. If the mayor is innocent, then he'll straight out deny the fake bodyguards, thus we have free mafia to kill without any wasted effort. This is the 3rd times already that im telling you to learn how to make a proper quote. Stop only quoting what a certain person wrote, Leave His NAME. What do you mean?
Oh I see what you did there.
|
On March 20 2008 09:33 LTT wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2008 09:31 HeRoS)Pink, ahrara_, CDRdude wrote:Also, why is everyone so confident that Ace and randombum are clean? While Ace's plan is pretty good, that shouldn't guarantee his innocence. We're not, Ace is voted because he has a plan of action that will benefit the town even if he were say mafia. Bum is just voted to kick Emp off because of his irrational approach to being elected. I have a concern with Ace's plan:
suppose that the mayor is townie and all the bodyguards get the right messages
then suppose that a mafia false claims that hes a bodyguard.
that means we'll end up killing several bodyguards and potentially the mayor for a mafiaso. not a good trade. If the mayor is innocent, then he'll straight out deny the fake bodyguards, thus we have free mafia to kill without any wasted effort. This is the 3rd times already that im telling you to learn how to make a proper quote. Stop only quoting what a certain person wrote, Leave His NAME. What do you mean? I'm not sure, I think he's talking about Ghar's bad quoting practices though. So THAT's where they all went!
LOL
|
On March 20 2008 10:39 fusionsdf wrote:
any smart mafia will role claim towny
also:
Paramedics: Dont protect Empyrean. The reason should be obvious.
You and your mafia buddies want to kill him tonight?
|
On March 20 2008 10:49 Mynock wrote:
Shallow, will you please stop with the incessant harassments? You have done absolutely nothing else the last 60 pages. And yes, we're all aware you're just "having fun".
I suppose you haven't noticed his harassments of me in the thread, plus the neverending stream of PM's that he keeps sending me. There are things here that you don't know about, I'm sorry to inform you.
|
Bravo Ace. Bravo. Now who's going to upload replays for us?
|
Can I propose we have a detective check up on our mayor? I think a Blue being lynched out of 129 possibilities is really..unlikely.
|
On March 20 2008 13:45 SpiritoftheTuna wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2008 13:44 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:
Can I propose we have a detective check up on our mayor? I think a Blue being lynched out of 129 possibilities is really..unlikely. Think that was part of the plan anyway. Plus, how would the mafia know who's blue?
Well, they'd know who wasn't Red, which is a good enough start :p
|
On March 20 2008 13:46 SpiritoftheTuna wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2008 13:45 Showtime! wrote:
Not only that he didn't even look to see who !@#$%! voted beforehand. He killed someone who wasn't even still in the game = uncool especially with all the damage he could have done. Wait. Who do you propose he should have used the instant lynch on, if at all? I wanna hear your side.
I think Showtime! has made a few dodgy posts, this isn't a flat out accusation but I'm watching him carefully. There are also a few more that I'm being wary of.
|
Showtime!, I'm awaiting your PM response. Please don't keep me waiting long, or I'll think you're taking the time to consort with your mafia buddies.
|
On March 20 2008 14:08 Showtime! wrote:
They did take out the biggest target per say.
phat move
I think I know your role.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On March 20 2008 14:10 Showtime! wrote:
ShaLLoW are you mad because I took over your role from the last game?
I think someone needs a lollipop.
Too bad I don't have any special powers.
Oh, wait: to annoy!
Does this mean that you're the mafioso shitstirrer? Because I'm very inclined to believe it, and I think that your sudden switch to posting bullshit while claiming to be drunk is very suspicious.
|
On March 20 2008 14:15 Showtime! wrote:
How many votes were there again? 111? Odds are almost the entire mob is playing.
Didn't the organizer already say that he made a waiting list, so if people didn't vote or abstrain they would be in the game instead? In other words the other people got cut.
Chances are it would have been better to go with a few other people's hunches or discussed it with the group first.
Gee, this seems like a fairly coherent post from someone who was drunk and babbling about two minutes ago. Please, tell me the secret to sobering up fast!
|
On March 20 2008 14:21 qrs wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2008 14:12 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:On March 20 2008 14:10 Showtime! wrote:
ShaLLoW are you mad because I took over your role from the last game?
I think someone needs a lollipop.
Too bad I don't have any special powers.
Oh, wait: to annoy! Does this mean that you're the mafioso shitstirrer? Because I'm very inclined to believe it, and I think that your sudden switch to posting bullshit while claiming to be drunk is very suspicious. Shallow, we should get one thing clear: you're the crapstirrer. You did it all last game, you're doing it again this game. (Not that it bothers me, but he who accuses...)
...
did you READ THE POST OF HIS I QUOTED? OR THE ONE BEFORE IT ABOUT INCONTROL? Have you read any of this guys posts? Your sudden jump to believe his story about being drunk, while he's still capable of posting a vastly contrasting, logical post, is a bit iffy.
Last game, I was mafia.
It was my prerogative.
|
On March 20 2008 14:24 Showtime! wrote:let him be I find it quite amusing just ignore him if he bothers you that much you may very well be this game as well too bad I don't have any bombs to tie you up on 
I think Teamliquid should implement a [/squelch] button.
|
Showtime! is an idiot. That's all I'll say about the matter.
qrs : I'm just a bit frustrated that everyone's taking my role from last game, and keeps bringing it up when we're in a completely different round of Mafia. Yes, I stirred shit. Why would I want to cause confusion this game? Get a detective to check on me, I'm Green through and through.
btw, I changed my signature. My old one is still available for reference in araav's list.
|
On March 20 2008 14:35 qrs wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2008 14:27 Ace wrote:
The ONLY reason people are upset is because Inc turned out to be blue instead of green. I say we just move on with the plan and stop trying to be disgruntled. It's only adding confusion and a bad start. This is the last time I'm addressing this. Look, in hindsight, I think it's clear that araav had the better plan. This Mafia game is different from others you may have played because there are a lot of special town roles. In fact, there are more special town roles than Mafia roles (without counting bodyguard). That being the case, it probably would have been smarter not to lynch (if you have that option) or to pardon your lynch (if you don't) rather than risk take the 1 in 5 chance of killing a valuable towny. By the second day, you should hopefully have more information about the roleplayers, so that would no longer be an issue. But it's water under the bridge now.
If only I hadn't renounced my campaign against Showtime! I'd make some sort of joke about Trolls also living under a bridge.
Thank God I didn't do it 
I have a question though, which is probably easily answered.
Did randombum know who you (Ace) intended to lynch before you did it, so that he had the option of pardon?
ps. LOL Sonuvbob ^^
|
On March 20 2008 14:38 GeneralStan wrote:
Showtime seems most suspicious to me.
The descrepancy between "drunk" and "sober" posts is enough to give me pause.
The only defense he has is "the mafia couldn't possibly be that stupid"
On March 20 2008 14:37 Showtime! wrote:
should be able to toss beer bottles at people or have the option of slipping a roofie into someone's drink rendering them useless for one night. That would be a cool role.
This sounds a lot like the Saboteur role to me, but again, like I said, the mafia couldn't possibly be that stupid!
I'm going to do what pisses me off, and point out last game. "ShaLLoW wouldn't be stupid enough to blatantly forge a PM".
|
Just as a sidenote, I'm aware that I am posting A LOT, so I'll be editing my upcoming posts more frequently instead of simply posting again. Make of it what you will.
EDIT : What has come up in the plan, Ace?
|
On March 20 2008 17:04 Naib wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2008 15:07 Ace wrote:On March 20 2008 15:04 ahrara_ wrote:
Well, I still don't think you're worth trusting even with strats and suspicions.
Alven:
I sure as hell hope detectives aren't revealing their roles to him. If the Detectives investigate me, then reveal their roles to me and see I'm innocent then why wouldn't they PM me? As for Showtime: Another shitstrirrer (so is Shallow, but if you look at his usual TL posts...well...go figure) I believe both even being innocent, can cause more harm than good, so we might as well get them out of the way...
Sorry, but...you're a fucking idiot!
|
On March 21 2008 08:11 Naib wrote:
The "selfish" part wasn't actually directed at you in person, just in general.
Oh and Shallow: ur mum ;(
See: the above one-liner is the quality of most of your posts made here. And it's not only me noticing / saying (Hell, it's not even only about Mafia but TL in general, just look around). Maybe everyone on the road is going on the wrong side...but maybe it's you?
/derailment off
Can't wait to see who dies when they day arises...That'll be how much hours approximately from here on?
Stir away, I'm not posting in the thread any more if this is how everyone's going to bandwagon against me. PM me if you want to discuss anything.
Any comments directed against my person or my posting habits can wind up in my PM box, rather than cluttering up the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
