| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 20 2008 02:14 Ace wrote: Guys seriously, stop worrying about the Double Lynches. That can do more harm than good if not used at the right time  We learned that last game, didn't we? | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 20 2008 03:51 Ghar wrote: In Australia, voting is mandatory. Though I don't have statistics on the turn out rate, Quite high I'm sure. We really need to make voting mandatory here. The confirmation post is supposed to ensure that people will at least get out once a day to vote, but it seems some people confirm and that's the extent of their participation. BTW I think the latest vote tally is about: Ace 29 Randombum 25 Empyrean 17 Anybody can confirm? | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 20 2008 09:26 Showtime! wrote: We're the mob. What do you expect?  | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 20 2008 11:01 Mynock wrote: Bah, another horrible move by Empyrean (assuming he is what he says he is). I was considering the chance that Emp was a townie, in which case what he was doing would have made some sense. First, he could draw the saboteur's ability away from the real roles, second, he might have wasted some of the mafia's killing power or even a suicide bomber. Now, if he's indeed a townie he's made another crucial mistake, instead of confusing the mafia (and possibly sacrificing himself) he's confusing the town even further. This is getting really weird now. But for now, I want to hear what others think tho. You just confused me :\ If he was a vanilla townie then we could have been wasting mafia roles, but they might have realized and ignored Emp. Or Emp really is a detective and he's trying to now avert attention from himself. | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
The descrepancy between "drunk" and "sober" posts is enough to give me pause. The only defense he has is "the mafia couldn't possibly be that stupid" | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 20 2008 14:37 CDRdude wrote: I request that a mafia or vigilante kill Showtime! on the grounds that he's a douche. And then there's this. The same reason I argued fakesteve should die last game | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 20 2008 14:39 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: This sounds a lot like the Saboteur role to me, but again, like I said, the mafia couldn't possibly be that stupid! I'm going to do what pisses me off, and point out last game. "ShaLLoW wouldn't be stupid enough to blatantly forge a PM". You've got a pretty good point here | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
This is so exciting | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
I vote mandalor (yes i'm putting it in the vote thread too) | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 24 2008 07:47 ZBiR wrote: Yeah, I vote for them being dismembered by four polar bears! Make it five and I'm in | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
Dumb idea. I'm not going to go so far as to say you're worth an investigation (though I have my suspicions). The Mafia wouldn't waste their effort scattering votes on random individuals, putting themselves to scrutiny. You can make the counter argument, "But they would want us not to suspect them. They know the townies would say 'that's too obvious!', which is dumb. By any measure of smart play, the Mafiosos either voted Ghar or Mandalor | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
| ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 24 2008 23:48 ~OpZ~ wrote: Lol...Why don't we link the tactics in attack to you, I don't know. But I'ma look at it now. I'm hardly worth it, but let them. Seriously, use a Jack's role check on me. It'd be a waste of time tho... I'm encouraging anybody to use checks on you, but to use them on the odd vote stragglers is a sheer waste. As for the first sentence . . . what?! | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
That's a bold assertion. I'm curious how we know so certainly, as we certainly haven't had 58 detective checks. BTW Good job Ace. We're going to win this game. | ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
On March 25 2008 00:28 Falcynn wrote: You do know that detectives are allowed to ask how many people voted for someone right? No That's an imba abilility Mafia watch out! We've got you in our crosshairs ^^. This is so different than the last game. I feel like the town has competent leadership, a plan, and that this time the mafia is on the run. | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
