[N]A Mostly Normal Game of Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
| ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
| ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 24 2020 14:09 Tictock wrote: Took a quick break from leveling (about 40% in) to read and stretch. I take Trfel's bumbling to be fairly genuine and am ok hand waving Gracks tone as town (honestly have only skimmed his posts though). If I had to shoot anyone right now (who has posted) I would kill FF. See you guys in a few more levels. I saw you throw shade at FF a little yesterday. Why you after him? | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
| ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 24 2020 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote: I dont know if you realised it but i have been kinda being after this from my first post to him. I guess i can reveal my this thing: now. I dont really think Hapa is town atm. I think he should at least maybe have some reads he doesnt atm. What are you basing this off? Is it meta or just that in your opinion everyone should have reads at this point? | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 24 2020 09:00 Trfel wrote: As to the second part, I dunno, I didn't really think a ton about it. I just don't count anything 100% out in terms of setup. It doesn't really matter anyway, no? I am not saying that Alakaslam wouldn't try to make himself mayor as mafia. He likely would. I feel that the way he has gone about it is genuine and towny. Hi trfel! Can you see how his run might not seem to me to come from a town perspective at all? Sure it looks like it but also you can also just as easily look at it as mafia trying to get free protection without having to risk anything because town gets the blame for the lynch and not slam. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 24 2020 15:06 Grackaroni wrote: I don't understand what you mean when you say I threw a wishy-washy backsy-clause in my post, though I don't think you understand the intention of my post to begin with. I wasn't weighing in either way on Hapa's alignment. I was just sharing my own feeling about being expected to make early game reads. For your Slam read I don't agree. It seems like Slam is earnestly trying to become mayor but it seems a bit out of character to me. He pretty frequently tries to lynch himself to avoid being in LYLO as town so I don't know why town Slam would want to place extra responsibility on himself to decide the lynch all by himself. Somehow I missed this post when i first read through the thread. You get +town points and a vote from me. grack for mayor! Drain the swamp! | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 24 2020 21:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well in my opinion everyone should have at least some reads at this moment. I also dont have to go further than last game where hapa's second post in the game is a read, followed by almost all of his posts being reads. So when hap says he doesn't like to give reads early that should raise a huge red flag for you. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 24 2020 06:34 Alakaslam wrote: So, I think the campaign is actually in itself (due to timing) it’s own credence to the fact that my pliability is a good thing. We should vote for him because his campaign validates him as town by its very nature? But he could just as easily be making this argument as mafia and playing the odds of a townkill by consent on day 1 for the free protection. He shouldn't get any towncred for the promise to do what town decides. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 24 2020 08:52 Trfel wrote: I don't think anything people say would change my opinion of Alakaslam, I don't ask to figure out more about Alakaslam's alignment, rather I asked to try and help figure out yours. Your answer isn't particularly helpful, but it's also understandable, so not much was gained. Oh well. For me, Alakaslam's mayor candidacy feels genuine. While I don't necessarily agree with his "pliable" argument, it seems to come from a town perspective. I also like his tone this game, it feels like a good balance between serious and playful, which I think is hard for Alakaslam as scum. I've seen him play both very joking and very serious as mafia, but a balance like shown here is harder to achieve. This post is bizarre. He says he doesn't think anything anyone will say will change his opinion of slam. But then later on: On November 24 2020 15:28 Trfel wrote: That's an interesting point about Alakaslam, I'll have ro think about that. His persistence about the mayor stuff with little substance is giving me pause too. Also: On November 24 2020 08:52 Trfel wrote: For me, Alakaslam's mayor candidacy feels genuine. While I don't necessarily agree with his "pliable" argument, it seems to come from a town perspective. I also like his tone this game, it feels like a good balance between serious and playful, which I think is hard for Alakaslam as scum. I've seen him play both very joking and very serious as mafia, but a balance like shown here is harder to achieve. Slam's pliable argument IS his entire campaign. Vote for him because he must be town because a vote for him is a vote for whatever town decides, therefore he must be town. I don't see how that comes from a town perspective. Trfel's start is all full of contradictions. He seems ultra confident about slam's tone and then seems to drop that line of thought so easily. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 00:42 Hapahauli wrote: @ Jock I have noticed that you have been critical of Slam's "joke" candidacy. Why then are you voting for Grack's campaign? Where are you getting the 'joke' candidacy thing from? I'm more critical of people assuming that slam's campaign makes him town, and i'm critical of slam putting that idea forward too. I have never said anything about slam's campaign being a joke or that i think about it in that way. I don't think he's joking at all. I'm voting for grack because he was thinking along similar lines to me as regards to slam's campaign not making him town, and bought it up in the thread before I did, so I gave him town points. I figure I'm better off voting for someone other than myself as mayor because i'm more likely to be able to pick out a town and help them be mayor than i am to do anything useful if i was mayor. At the moment grack has town points so he has my vote. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 00:56 Grackaroni wrote: Is Rayn also not planning to run for Mayor? I thought so from what he was saying yesterday. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 01:04 Hapahauli wrote: So is it fair to say that of the thread, you consider Grack the "towniest"? Yes. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
me rn: + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 15:56 Trfel wrote: The more I think about it, the less I like Jockmcplop's criticisms of Alakaslam's mayoral run. I'm not sure how much incentive there is for mafia to want the mayor's bodyguard protection; how likely is it that mafia will be targeted with KP? There is no confirmed town KP, and a third party with KP (while not out of the question) would still have to target him, which is a bit strange too. Nothing Jockmcplop is saying is technically wrong: mafia could campaign to try and get the mayor protection and absolve themselves of responsibility by lynching town's target and getting townreads. But it's just not very compelling. Alakaslam could also be town doing exactly the same thing. The mafia motivation for that kind of play isn't really more compelling than the town motivation, I don't understand how it makes Alakaslam mafia. I feel like I worded that poorly but it's late at night so I'm not sure if I can say it any better right now. Let me know if that doesn't make sense. I think Jockmcplop is likely my top suspect at this time. I thought I made it pretty clear I was more critical of you townreading slam than i was of slam's run. You are exactly right that slam's run *could* be from a town perspective, but my problem was that you immediately assumed it was from a town perspective and didn't even consider the idea that mafia could be doing the same thing for mafia reasons. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
hapa, trfel and vivax have all mentioned that they would expect rayn to be more aggressive, but that's not my experience of rayn on day 1. He tends to come into the game with a strategy and that continues until something triggers him, but that could be on day 1 or day 3 or any time. I've seen him play like this on day 1 before as town and as mafia. I think rayn is town here. His interaction with hapa seems to be that he's trying to get a read on him, and I can see why rayn would focus on that given the player list, and I can't really see any mafia motivation in anything rayn has said/done so far. He just looks like he's trying to figure things out. I really like this whole part of rayn's argument and it it pretty much mirrors what i was thinking at the time: On November 25 2020 06:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: I still don't know why Hapa doesn't want to be mayor. And it stinks. I dont necessarily buy the "i dont wanna be town leader" because to me it doesnt sit right. Why dont you want to lead the town if youre likely to be right (as you should at least think you are if youre town) and you are generally a good scumhunter? I just dont get it. Especially coupled with one of Hapa's later posts: Which of you everyone think Hapa does not fit these categories? Raise your hand and i will immediately call you mafia.... But that was not the main point. The main point was that i think both of Hapa and Trfel thinking it's a good observation that "rayn says he cannot read Slam and then reads him town anyways" is at best crappy as hell because good posts make people town and bad posts make them mafia most of the time. Slam made the best observation (at least in my mind -- and there should be no doubt about it for anyone who is reading the game properly) in the game at that point. No matter if i think i cant read slam i am going to give him town credit for that. Notably aswell, for Hapa this shouldnt be any surprise because in the last game i also said i cant read slam and i cant read acro and i was amongst the first to yell they are mafia.... So yeah there is that. Now i am going to look at the trfel/grack interaction and then post my reads. Hapa always struck me as the kind of player that would step up for town so it set alarms off when he said he didn't want the responsibility. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 21:20 Trfel wrote: @First paragraph: I see, sorry I missed that. @Second paragraph: It's the way that Alakaslam was going about his campaign that seemed towny to me, not the fact about it. Mostly a tonal read at first. I do think that the "pliability" argument is more likely to come from town, as (in my opinion) lynch blame doesn't really exist and as a result, it feels a bit strange for mafia to come up with that argument. But the tonal read was the main part of my read. In other news, I really do want you to be town this game ![]() No you're exactly right. I haven't had a whole lot of time so far but i'm here all day (minus video game playing time of course) today so you'll get more out of me. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 05:00 ShoCkeyy wrote: I guess no one trusts me ![]() Shockeyy is PARANOID, man. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 23:30 Hapahauli wrote: Mornin'. So we have a lynch in 6 hours. This discussion needs to be about a) who is mayor, and b) who town wants dead. There are too many people talking about light suspicions and townreads. That is not important right now. Trfel for mayor. Whoever is mayor should shoot Grack or Shockeyy. I think Grack is mafia, and I think Trfel brought up the best point against him: he has been relatively active and running for mayor, but reading his filter, I have no sense of what is "platform" is and who he even wants lynched. That seems like the hallmark of scum "looking like they want to contribute." Shockeyy is remarkably disengaged in this game. He is existing, but again, no idea of what he wants to accomplish beyond his mayoral preferences. I disagree that townreads aren't important right now. They pretty much narrow down the pool of who can be mayor. Clearly shockeyy has no people townreading him so he won't be mayor. Out of the people claiming they want to be mayor, only slam and ticktock have said what they will do if elected. That's a problem. Out of those two I would probably prefer slam because at least he's been here enough that i'm confident he knows exactly what is happening. I'm unvoting grack because I don't feel like he has continued to engage with the mayor thing at all really like he never really wanted to be mayor in the first place. Trfel seems like an odd choice to me. He hasn't said he wanted to be mayor and has given no indication of what he would do if he was mayor. I can't vote for him anyway. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9438 Posts
On November 25 2020 23:40 Vivax wrote: I think he just wanted to make a funny entrance. Don't really see him being mafia atm. Shockeyy is always like that. If I'd kill him then not because I think he's scum but because I will never be sure about what he is, probably. Someone mentioned earlier that Jock seemed less analytical than in his usual town games and I'll agree. I also find it odd in his case that he doesn't think Trfel is town given when they have been teammates and imo Trfel doesn't post like in that game (the "Trfel help" one). That said my lynch pool atm would be something along Shockeyy, Jock, Fefe. Maybe TickTock because he kinda stopped playing after getting townread by a few. I don't think i've been mafia with trfel. | ||
| ||