|
On December 02 2020 02:09 raynpelikoneet wrote: If my stuff is plainly false why dont you point it out?
Because: 1) It will never end. 2) Some of the things you bring up are so insufferingly obviously wrong that I feel insulted at having to try and explain them.
|
Finland43268 Posts
EBWOP:
On December 02 2020 01:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On December 02 2020 00:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: I do not at all associate scum Rayn with keeping a discussion focused, especially in the 2nd example.
vs
Rayn is hyper paranoid, stubborn, and a bit of a "steamroller" in his typical town games. explain this pls.
On December 02 2020 01:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why is your case on TT all about "if Vivax is mafia then..." but you say before that there is no difference between TT and Vivax?
|
Why don't you read the first line of my "case" on TT. First paragraph. Then tell me why you are wrong.
|
Finland43268 Posts
This:
The way that TicTock approaches his Vivax read is very scummy. I think it is scummy regardless of Vivax's alignment, but I think it is especially so if Vivax is mafia. ??
|
Great. That's step 1.
Step 2 is now explaining to me why you were wrong.
|
For bonus points, you can find the post on Page 8 of my filter that most clearly explains my stance on my indifference.
|
Finland43268 Posts
I guess i can see that from your pov. Can you tell me why you decided to say this: 'I do not at all associate scum Rayn with keeping a discussion focused, especially in the 2nd example." and this "Rayn is hyper paranoid, stubborn, and a bit of a "steamroller" in his typical town games."
?
|
The buddying is working Rayn! Almost there!
|
Fuck I need to put that in the QT. Oops.
|
Are those statements mutually exclusive?
|
Finland43268 Posts
i am sorry i have to look for what that actually means :D
|
Can those statements both be true at the same time? Yes or no?
|
Finland43268 Posts
i cant tell you that i just want you to answer why you wrote those things at the time you wrote them.
|
Finland43268 Posts
On December 02 2020 02:18 Hapahauli wrote: Can those statements both be true at the same time? Yes or no? yes
|
Finland43268 Posts
i dont think you have to look that up if youre town.
|
What's the question?
Why I changed my read on you, or why my meta assessments of you don't seemingly "match"?
I changed my read on you. Both of those statements are part of your meta. Statement 2 applies in all of your town games. Statement 1 applies in some of your town games, but I believe it rarely, if ever manifests itself in your scumgames.
|
On December 02 2020 02:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: i dont think you have to look that up if youre town.
Look what up?
|
Finland43268 Posts
On December 02 2020 02:22 Hapahauli wrote: What's the question?
Why I changed my read on you, or why my meta assessments of you don't seemingly "match"?
I changed my read on you. Both of those statements are part of your meta. Statement 2 applies in all of your town games. Statement 1 applies in some of your town games, but I believe it rarely, if ever manifests itself in your scumgames. This is the question:
You scumread me early on in the game for: Doing 1, but 'I do not at all associate scum Rayn with keeping a discussion focused'?
|
Finland43268 Posts
That's literally all i did D1 and you called me plausible mafia again or what the fuck ever and called me mafia for me restraining from posting and doing things that were things i was called bad for in last game while i was easily the hottest shit in that game (fuck you iamp).
|
Finland43268 Posts
I also dont like at all you shitting on my reads on FF and Slam because noone in this game has been right so far and it feels like you'd rether attack my credibility in total instead of trying to lynch mafia.
|
|
|
|