|
On June 04 2020 03:10 CopCake wrote:
Idk what is worse
Tfrl's "I have to sleep" two times consecutive promising reads or Vivax's saying my meta that then later apparently is irrelevant.
So far I think Jock/Jekaka/Tiktock should be in the never lynch forever.
Zey are you there?
On June 04 2020 05:14 CopCake wrote:
Idk, I am ok with a Tfrl lynch too, the only problem is that I wish he was here so I could counter him and discuss.
I hate when I lynch an inactive because if he ends to be town...
Tfrl was inactive that game, I got lynched day one so you cant say is from different days.
|
I honestly like my vote and I won’t change it.
|
Oh it seems you all decided to lynch Tfrl. Anyways, inactivite doesnt equal mafia.
|
On July 09 2020 15:26 CopCake wrote:
Oh it seems you all decided to lynch Tfrl. Anyways, inactivite doesnt equal mafia.
Who’s you all?
|
On July 09 2020 15:46 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2020 15:26 CopCake wrote:
Oh it seems you all decided to lynch Tfrl. Anyways, inactivite doesnt equal mafia. Who’s you all?
Slam, VE, Rayn, Ticktock, Chezinu
|
Shockey I am glad you are here. Tell me, did you consider Tfrl to be active last game? Why do you think he is getting lunched by the citizens?
|
On July 09 2020 07:32 ShoCkeyy wrote:
My current thoughts are:
Alakaslam (1): VisceraEyes
Shockeyy (1): Jockmcplop
VisceraEyes (1): Tictock
Tictock (1): Copcake
jockmcplop (1): Alakaslam
One of these fuckers are mafia 100%.
I meant the ones voting.
shockeyy can you explain to me as if i'm a small moronic being (a child) how you came to this conclusion?
|
Hey Jock, what do you think of all this Tfrl thing?
|
Lynching trfel here seems a bit like guessing. Not a fan of just guessing, even on day 1. If he's town, i think there's probably a mafia on him (at a push i would say its Slam).
|
Slam susses me all day and then without explanation other than 'i can see it being trfel' just switches his vote. What is that? Why?
|
In fact, I really don't like that at all
##unvote
##vote: alakaslam
|
I am going to wait for him to see his defense but I agree with you on that or at least I like your pov.
|
Meh Jock, he did say several times he thinks lynching inactives is good, so makes sense to me.
|
On July 09 2020 17:25 CopCake wrote:
I am going to wait for him to see his defense but I agree with you on that or at least I like your pov.
I'd like to know what VE thinks about it too, considering he was on slam before and now they are on trfel together. VE's vote on slam was an early randomish vote but he continued to suspect him, or at least shade his reads, later on too.
I have a strong reason to sus shockeyy right now but i want to wait until he explains the post i quoted above.
I can't get a good read on ticktock but tbh i don't agree with your reason for sussing him. I'm like 90% sure you're town anyway.
|
On July 09 2020 17:30 Tictock wrote:
Meh Jock, he did say several times he thinks lynching inactives is good, so makes sense to me.
That doesn't make it any more townie in my eyes.
Why trfel over me? He obviously thinks he has a good case on me, because:
On July 09 2020 02:22 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2020 19:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 08 2020 18:59 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2020 18:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 08 2020 18:47 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2020 18:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well TT is town so there is that. I think there is a huge difference already in how he approaches the game in comparison to the last game. You don't think someone playing mafia two games in a row would try consciously to approach the game differently? Or did you mean different specifically in a townie kinda way? Yes, specifically in a townie kind of way. The thing i find a bit weird in your approach is that in case you're actually interested in VE (who had the total 180 approach on shockeyy than you did -- so basically you should), i dont really know why you're "harassing" shockeyy right now instead of him? Like shockeyy did what he did and his posting so far definitely needs explaining. Which is something shockeyy will do anyways when he returns from the hangover land. Or if he doesn't, he is probably mafia. It's like... You progressed on something that will come out regardless of you asking for it, and left something else just be. Aka, from my pov you focused something useless instead of something useful. VE has already said he isn't going to post much on day 1 so i don't see how its more useful to go after him than shockeyy tbh. I dont care who posts how much. - shockeyy needs to explain his shit anyways - VE doesn't need to explain his shit unless someone asks to - Based on your posting you should want VE to explain his shit For other reasons I actually am starting to sus jock
On July 09 2020 07:48 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2020 07:32 ShoCkeyy wrote:
My current thoughts are:
Alakaslam (1): VisceraEyes
Shockeyy (1): Jockmcplop
VisceraEyes (1): Tictock
Tictock (1): Copcake
jockmcplop (1): Alakaslam
One of these fuckers are mafia 100%.
I meant the ones voting. It is jock my brother Vote with me!
Its not just the lack of a reason to vote for trfel but the lack of a reason to stop voting for me which i'm interested in.
Just 'lynch inactives' isn't really good enough when he seemed sure i was mafia and i made zero posts in the meantime.
|
I read through Cakes filter and her play kinda bugs me. Most of her posts are not really game related, and there just doesnt seem to be much thought going on in her reads.
On July 09 2020 06:04 CopCake wrote:
jockmcplop (first!) I call him town
ShoCkeyy call him super town or at least his tone seems
Tictock mafia
Chezinu mafia???
Trefe mafia??
VisceraEyes carefree, leaning town
raynpelikoneet town
CopCake obvious perfect town
Alakaslam seems carefree, almost as VE, but there is a factor that makes me think he is less town than VE.
This is where I am right now.
Last few posts she is fighting against Trfel being lynched because "he was inactive and town last game" yet here she has him as mafia (and this was after his post) as well as Chez. So basically the 2 most inactive ppl this game.
Her scumread on me is also really off. Like it reads more like she decided to push me and just keeps saying "I dont buy him being town" or "this feels off" but never explains.
I posted about a couple other things earlier that felt off or downright bullshit to me as well, so...
##Vote: Copcake
|
On July 09 2020 17:40 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2020 17:30 Tictock wrote:
Meh Jock, he did say several times he thinks lynching inactives is good, so makes sense to me. That doesn't make it any more townie in my eyes. Why trfel over me? He obviously thinks he has a good case on me, because: Show nested quote +On July 09 2020 02:22 Alakaslam wrote:On July 08 2020 19:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 08 2020 18:59 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2020 18:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 08 2020 18:47 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2020 18:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well TT is town so there is that. I think there is a huge difference already in how he approaches the game in comparison to the last game. You don't think someone playing mafia two games in a row would try consciously to approach the game differently? Or did you mean different specifically in a townie kinda way? Yes, specifically in a townie kind of way. The thing i find a bit weird in your approach is that in case you're actually interested in VE (who had the total 180 approach on shockeyy than you did -- so basically you should), i dont really know why you're "harassing" shockeyy right now instead of him? Like shockeyy did what he did and his posting so far definitely needs explaining. Which is something shockeyy will do anyways when he returns from the hangover land. Or if he doesn't, he is probably mafia. It's like... You progressed on something that will come out regardless of you asking for it, and left something else just be. Aka, from my pov you focused something useless instead of something useful. VE has already said he isn't going to post much on day 1 so i don't see how its more useful to go after him than shockeyy tbh. I dont care who posts how much. - shockeyy needs to explain his shit anyways - VE doesn't need to explain his shit unless someone asks to - Based on your posting you should want VE to explain his shit For other reasons I actually am starting to sus jock Show nested quote +On July 09 2020 07:48 Alakaslam wrote:On July 09 2020 07:32 ShoCkeyy wrote:
My current thoughts are:
Alakaslam (1): VisceraEyes
Shockeyy (1): Jockmcplop
VisceraEyes (1): Tictock
Tictock (1): Copcake
jockmcplop (1): Alakaslam
One of these fuckers are mafia 100%.
I meant the ones voting. It is jock my brother Vote with me! Its not just the lack of a reason to vote for trfel but the lack of a reason to stop voting for me which i'm interested in. Just 'lynch inactives' isn't really good enough when he seemed sure i was mafia and i made zero posts in the meantime.
Explain how any of that indicates "a good case" and not just a feeling?
I think you are just OMGUSing here
|
On July 09 2020 17:42 Tictock wrote:I read through Cakes filter and her play kinda bugs me. Most of her posts are not really game related, and there just doesnt seem to be much thought going on in her reads. Show nested quote +On July 09 2020 06:04 CopCake wrote:
jockmcplop (first!) I call him town
ShoCkeyy call him super town or at least his tone seems
Tictock mafia
Chezinu mafia???
Trefe mafia??
VisceraEyes carefree, leaning town
raynpelikoneet town
CopCake obvious perfect town
Alakaslam seems carefree, almost as VE, but there is a factor that makes me think he is less town than VE.
This is where I am right now. Last few posts she is fighting against Trfel being lynched because "he was inactive and town last game" yet here she has him as mafia (and this was after his post) as well as Chez. So basically the 2 most inactive ppl this game. Her scumread on me is also really off. Like it reads more like she decided to push me and just keeps saying "I dont buy him being town" or "this feels off" but never explains. I posted about a couple other things earlier that felt off or downright bullshit to me as well, so... ##Vote: Copcake
Do you see the “????”
That is the difference between you and them.
And ofc it bugs you because I want to lunch you.
You change reads very fast Ticktock.
|
On July 09 2020 17:44 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On July 09 2020 17:40 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 09 2020 17:30 Tictock wrote:
Meh Jock, he did say several times he thinks lynching inactives is good, so makes sense to me. That doesn't make it any more townie in my eyes. Why trfel over me? He obviously thinks he has a good case on me, because: On July 09 2020 02:22 Alakaslam wrote:On July 08 2020 19:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 08 2020 18:59 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2020 18:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 08 2020 18:47 Jockmcplop wrote:On July 08 2020 18:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well TT is town so there is that. I think there is a huge difference already in how he approaches the game in comparison to the last game. You don't think someone playing mafia two games in a row would try consciously to approach the game differently? Or did you mean different specifically in a townie kinda way? Yes, specifically in a townie kind of way. The thing i find a bit weird in your approach is that in case you're actually interested in VE (who had the total 180 approach on shockeyy than you did -- so basically you should), i dont really know why you're "harassing" shockeyy right now instead of him? Like shockeyy did what he did and his posting so far definitely needs explaining. Which is something shockeyy will do anyways when he returns from the hangover land. Or if he doesn't, he is probably mafia. It's like... You progressed on something that will come out regardless of you asking for it, and left something else just be. Aka, from my pov you focused something useless instead of something useful. VE has already said he isn't going to post much on day 1 so i don't see how its more useful to go after him than shockeyy tbh. I dont care who posts how much. - shockeyy needs to explain his shit anyways - VE doesn't need to explain his shit unless someone asks to - Based on your posting you should want VE to explain his shit For other reasons I actually am starting to sus jock On July 09 2020 07:48 Alakaslam wrote:On July 09 2020 07:32 ShoCkeyy wrote:
My current thoughts are:
Alakaslam (1): VisceraEyes
Shockeyy (1): Jockmcplop
VisceraEyes (1): Tictock
Tictock (1): Copcake
jockmcplop (1): Alakaslam
One of these fuckers are mafia 100%.
I meant the ones voting. It is jock my brother Vote with me! Its not just the lack of a reason to vote for trfel but the lack of a reason to stop voting for me which i'm interested in. Just 'lynch inactives' isn't really good enough when he seemed sure i was mafia and i made zero posts in the meantime. Explain how any of that indicates "a good case" and not just a feeling? I think you are just OMGUSing here
You're welcome to think that if you want. Its simple though, he was sure i was mafia. I can tell because he said "It is Jock my brother". There's no uncertainty there at all and no room for interpretation. in his eyes I'm the mafia, but for some reason he'd rather lynch an inactive.
|
On July 09 2020 17:47 CopCake wrote:
... because I want to lunch you.
Oh god, I didnt know you were into that.
Seriously though, it's pretty easy to look at my posts and see my thinking. Granted I'm biased, but I think it should be easy to see that I started seeing things that made me start to look more closely at you and really never cared (and still don't) that you think I am scum.
@ Jock, U do you mate, I said what I think. Slam could easily be mafia here, I just don't get that vibe from his posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
