|
On June 03 2017 09:05 Tubesock wrote:
Hard to keep up with the flurry of posts.
BH, it's been an hour since you targeted Vivax. No vote yet, how committed are you to this? You don't seem like you're pushing conversation (haven't answered Grack yet).
the fuck is this shit
hard to keep up with this flurry of 10 posts? that were all one-liners?
and you're tryna call someone out for not pushing their rng?
I can't even keep this post short while trying to vocalize everything stupid about it. if this isn't for reactions I wanna lynch you for being this bad
|
On June 03 2017 10:04 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 09:05 Tubesock wrote:
Hard to keep up with the flurry of posts.
BH, it's been an hour since you targeted Vivax. No vote yet, how committed are you to this? You don't seem like you're pushing conversation (haven't answered Grack yet). the fuck is this shit hard to keep up with this flurry of 10 posts? that were all one-liners? and you're tryna call someone out for not pushing their rng? I can't even keep this post short while trying to vocalize everything stupid about it. if this isn't for reactions I wanna lynch you for being this bad
you don't think that was a hilarious joke?
SOooo you're not having fun are you?
|
VT claim. Will be around in a bit.
|
On June 03 2017 10:09 Tubesock wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 10:04 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 09:05 Tubesock wrote:
Hard to keep up with the flurry of posts.
BH, it's been an hour since you targeted Vivax. No vote yet, how committed are you to this? You don't seem like you're pushing conversation (haven't answered Grack yet). the fuck is this shit hard to keep up with this flurry of 10 posts? that were all one-liners? and you're tryna call someone out for not pushing their rng? I can't even keep this post short while trying to vocalize everything stupid about it. if this isn't for reactions I wanna lynch you for being this bad you don't think that was a hilarious joke? SOooo you're not having fun are you?
which part was the jokr
|
On June 03 2017 10:18 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 10:09 Tubesock wrote:On June 03 2017 10:04 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 09:05 Tubesock wrote:
Hard to keep up with the flurry of posts.
BH, it's been an hour since you targeted Vivax. No vote yet, how committed are you to this? You don't seem like you're pushing conversation (haven't answered Grack yet). the fuck is this shit hard to keep up with this flurry of 10 posts? that were all one-liners? and you're tryna call someone out for not pushing their rng? I can't even keep this post short while trying to vocalize everything stupid about it. if this isn't for reactions I wanna lynch you for being this bad you don't think that was a hilarious joke? SOooo you're not having fun are you? which part was the jokr
uh the not keeping up with half a page of one liners. 4 by one peron....
SInce no one is talking, what are your thoughts on BH's RNG lynch? Do you think anything about it?
|
On June 03 2017 10:20 Tubesock wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 10:18 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 10:09 Tubesock wrote:On June 03 2017 10:04 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 09:05 Tubesock wrote:
Hard to keep up with the flurry of posts.
BH, it's been an hour since you targeted Vivax. No vote yet, how committed are you to this? You don't seem like you're pushing conversation (haven't answered Grack yet). the fuck is this shit hard to keep up with this flurry of 10 posts? that were all one-liners? and you're tryna call someone out for not pushing their rng? I can't even keep this post short while trying to vocalize everything stupid about it. if this isn't for reactions I wanna lynch you for being this bad you don't think that was a hilarious joke? SOooo you're not having fun are you? which part was the jokr uh the not keeping up with half a page of one liners. 4 by one peron.... SInce no one is talking, what are your thoughts on BH's RNG lynch? Do you think anything about it?
basically meaningless. the reason I don't like how you are trying to discuss bh not keeping his push it whatever is because bh has done effectively nothing and you are trying to discuss the nothing
|
On June 03 2017 10:23 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 10:20 Tubesock wrote:On June 03 2017 10:18 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 10:09 Tubesock wrote:On June 03 2017 10:04 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 09:05 Tubesock wrote:
Hard to keep up with the flurry of posts.
BH, it's been an hour since you targeted Vivax. No vote yet, how committed are you to this? You don't seem like you're pushing conversation (haven't answered Grack yet). the fuck is this shit hard to keep up with this flurry of 10 posts? that were all one-liners? and you're tryna call someone out for not pushing their rng? I can't even keep this post short while trying to vocalize everything stupid about it. if this isn't for reactions I wanna lynch you for being this bad you don't think that was a hilarious joke? SOooo you're not having fun are you? which part was the jokr uh the not keeping up with half a page of one liners. 4 by one peron.... SInce no one is talking, what are your thoughts on BH's RNG lynch? Do you think anything about it? basically meaningless. the reason I don't like how you are trying to discuss bh not keeping his push it whatever is because bh has done effectively nothing and you are trying to discuss the nothing
So I should discuss Prison Breaks "Hi" post instead or Gracks? BH had the most "interesting" post at that point. Seemed logical. I did actually entertain filter diving LightningStrike cause I think that's funny too with 4 posts or whatever he had at the time.
With some conditions I'm absolutely fine with a RNG lynch. What do you say to that?
|
On June 03 2017 10:27 Tubesock wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 10:23 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 10:20 Tubesock wrote:On June 03 2017 10:18 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 10:09 Tubesock wrote:On June 03 2017 10:04 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 09:05 Tubesock wrote:
Hard to keep up with the flurry of posts.
BH, it's been an hour since you targeted Vivax. No vote yet, how committed are you to this? You don't seem like you're pushing conversation (haven't answered Grack yet). the fuck is this shit hard to keep up with this flurry of 10 posts? that were all one-liners? and you're tryna call someone out for not pushing their rng? I can't even keep this post short while trying to vocalize everything stupid about it. if this isn't for reactions I wanna lynch you for being this bad you don't think that was a hilarious joke? SOooo you're not having fun are you? which part was the jokr uh the not keeping up with half a page of one liners. 4 by one peron.... SInce no one is talking, what are your thoughts on BH's RNG lynch? Do you think anything about it? basically meaningless. the reason I don't like how you are trying to discuss bh not keeping his push it whatever is because bh has done effectively nothing and you are trying to discuss the nothing So I should discuss Prison Breaks "Hi" post instead or Gracks? BH had the most "interesting" post at that point. Seemed logical. I did actually entertain filter diving LightningStrike cause I think that's funny too with 4 posts or whatever he had at the time. With some conditions I'm absolutely fine with a RNG lynch. What do you say to that?
no. the whole point is what bh did was as nothing as the hi post, and you wouldn't discuss that
and rng lynches are bad because you get 0 information from them, except based on who thinks it's a stupid idea, but that's pretty useless too
|
I still maintain that most of your opinions are bad but I think you're town. fuck
|
RNG votes are cool, an RNG lynch seems horrible, doesn't give any information and turns the game into auto + there's no way to actually check if it's random and you don't know if the person determining the "random" factor is town or scum either
|
Morning.
I think TW has rolled scum again cause his opening post is exaggeratedly aggressive but the followup doesn't carry the same conviction. I don't think he has much faith into his own argument and keeps reluctantly dragging it along afterwards to keep the appearance.
Tone just doesn't appear natural and relaxed to me since we just started out.
Do you agree y/n?
|
On June 03 2017 12:49 Vivax wrote:
Morning.
I think TW has rolled scum again cause his opening post is exaggeratedly aggressive but the followup doesn't carry the same conviction. I don't think he has much faith into his own argument and keeps reluctantly dragging it along afterwards to keep the appearance.
Tone just doesn't appear natural and relaxed to me since we just started out.
Do you agree y/n?
n
of course I don't carry the same conviction after I realize he is joking. still think his comments on bh are hot garbage but I'm not going to continue being aggressive because I think he's town
|
On June 03 2017 13:39 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 12:49 Vivax wrote:
Morning.
I think TW has rolled scum again cause his opening post is exaggeratedly aggressive but the followup doesn't carry the same conviction. I don't think he has much faith into his own argument and keeps reluctantly dragging it along afterwards to keep the appearance.
Tone just doesn't appear natural and relaxed to me since we just started out.
Do you agree y/n? n of course I don't carry the same conviction after I realize he is joking. still think his comments on bh are hot garbage but I'm not going to continue being aggressive because I think he's town
Why do you look so upset about that post? I don't get why it warrants such emotionality.
|
On June 03 2017 13:43 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2017 13:39 Tumblewood wrote:On June 03 2017 12:49 Vivax wrote:
Morning.
I think TW has rolled scum again cause his opening post is exaggeratedly aggressive but the followup doesn't carry the same conviction. I don't think he has much faith into his own argument and keeps reluctantly dragging it along afterwards to keep the appearance.
Tone just doesn't appear natural and relaxed to me since we just started out.
Do you agree y/n? n of course I don't carry the same conviction after I realize he is joking. still think his comments on bh are hot garbage but I'm not going to continue being aggressive because I think he's town Why do you look so upset about that post? I don't get why it warrants such emotionality.
gonna have to disagree on that being emotional
|
On June 03 2017 12:49 Vivax wrote:
Morning.
I think TW has rolled scum again cause his opening post is exaggeratedly aggressive but the followup doesn't carry the same conviction. I don't think he has much faith into his own argument and keeps reluctantly dragging it along afterwards to keep the appearance.
Tone just doesn't appear natural and relaxed to me since we just started out.
Do you agree y/n?
Disagree because his point in the first post was focused more on Tubesock's post being dumb than Tubesock being scum.
|
I can sort of live with TW just going on a tirade about bad plays. At least it has an end result: He ends up thinking that TS is town.
What I can't live with is Grack just being sort of in the thread without doing anything besides asking an useless question to bh and reacting to my post. I appreciate the answer but everything about him otherwise screams disinterest in contrast to TWs approach. Also a noticeable lack of suspicion towards TW. I don't think it was that obvious like for Grack that TW wasn't using that to form a scumread instead of using that to criticize Tube without scumhunting purposes.
|
Early reads:
Tube town for pushing game forward and being proactive.
TW town for lashing out at something he didn't like and avoiding his scum play lazy buddying. It looked overly emotional to me but he claims it wasn't.
Grack scum for being lazy, passive and kind of just reacting to things around him without attempting to reach a satisfactory conclusion or looking like he wanted to. Neither shitpost-y grack nor tryhard-y grack. Just bore-y grack.
Rest null.
|
On June 03 2017 16:08 Vivax wrote:
I don't think it was that obvious like for Grack that TW wasn't using that to form a scumread instead of using that to criticize Tube without scumhunting purposes.
Nonsense. I'm best known for my reading comprehension.
|
United Kingdom30775 Posts
At a wedding all day. Tw looks too forced, only read so far.
|
Hi all! Long time no speak for a lot of you. I've played a bit of video Mafia since I've been away (which I'm horrible at, it turns out) but I'm excited to get back into forums.
I think TW's thinking makes sense if you assume he doesn't know TS's usual posting style (which I think is like almost comically formal); it wasn't immediately obvious to me that TS was joking either. But that said, I'm not sure that I buy TW's switch to town reading TS? TW doesn't recant on his thinking TS is dumb - but if TS is joking then obviously he doesn't believe it, and so isn't dumb?
I also don't like Vivax's read on TS. Asking about RNG lynches isn't driving the game forward either. I'd say TS is null and TW is scummy null; giving them both a town pass at this stage is waaay premature. But at the same time, I do really like Vivax pinging Grack. So overall TR.
The people I really don't like are Onegu, BH, Grack and LS. Everyone else can be forgiven for not being in the thread (HF is British I think, so he gets a pass as well) but each of those has been here and has studiously avoided saying anything meaningful. LS has, what, four or five posts, none saying anything even vaguely game related. I seem to recall LS has trouble getting started as Mafia... this would fit right into that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
