|
On March 25 2017 16:25 Tumblewood wrote: in order, the scumteams that make the most sense by association are: damdred/disfo > amg/disfo > damdred/xata > amg/damdred > disfo/xata > amg/xata > any team with Koshi > any team with rayn or df and I think damdred/disfo might be a winner What is "any team with rayn or df"?
|
I actually liked Tumble's posts in the recent pages. Didn't feel like he planned any of that in advance, but rather started rethinking things and his conclusions flowed directly from whatever he was thinking. Dunno if I explained that well, but basically I don't get the feeling there was an agenda in there or that he wanted to especially "look good" at all.
|
Tumble: who do you think would be the "pushover" scum in your theory for why ritoky was killed? I like the theory otherwise, but I don't really see who would just let Eden control the kill.. When he was barely even playing by N1.
|
On March 25 2017 18:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2017 16:25 Tumblewood wrote: in order, the scumteams that make the most sense by association are: damdred/disfo > amg/disfo > damdred/xata > amg/damdred > disfo/xata > amg/xata > any team with Koshi > any team with rayn or df and I think damdred/disfo might be a winner What is "any team with rayn or df"?
Just that, rayn + X or DF + X?
|
On March 25 2017 14:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am going to be so mad at Xatalos if Damdred is mafia in this game.
If that's the case, I'll admit I was wrong when I said "at least I've been more correct than you". I really hope that's not the case though
|
On March 25 2017 19:45 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2017 18:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 25 2017 16:25 Tumblewood wrote: in order, the scumteams that make the most sense by association are: damdred/disfo > amg/disfo > damdred/xata > amg/damdred > disfo/xata > amg/xata > any team with Koshi > any team with rayn or df and I think damdred/disfo might be a winner What is "any team with rayn or df"? Just that, rayn + X or DF + X? so. how does a team work that is e.g. df+x where x is not rayn?
|
On March 25 2017 11:41 Tumblewood wrote: maybe I could just go with the "never wrong on TvT arguments" theory and lynch amg and damdred. seems like a mighty easy play
What's this theory? Thread shitfights are always TvT? >.> I'll admit I've never participated in one as scum, but I've seen cases of that happening. Me (town) vs rayn (scum) for example haha
|
On March 25 2017 19:49 disformation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2017 19:45 Xatalos wrote:On March 25 2017 18:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 25 2017 16:25 Tumblewood wrote: in order, the scumteams that make the most sense by association are: damdred/disfo > amg/disfo > damdred/xata > amg/damdred > disfo/xata > amg/xata > any team with Koshi > any team with rayn or df and I think damdred/disfo might be a winner What is "any team with rayn or df"? Just that, rayn + X or DF + X? so. how does a team work that is e.g. df+x where x is not rayn?
That's a good point... it doesn't even work. You're both fake claiming or genuinely claiming after all.
|
On March 25 2017 19:50 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2017 11:41 Tumblewood wrote: maybe I could just go with the "never wrong on TvT arguments" theory and lynch amg and damdred. seems like a mighty easy play What's this theory? Thread shitfights are always TvT? >.> I'll admit I've never participated in one as scum, but I've seen cases of that happening. Me (town) vs rayn (scum) for example haha if i remember correctly he had like calix and me as tvt for our d1 argument.
|
On March 25 2017 19:52 disformation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2017 19:50 Xatalos wrote:On March 25 2017 11:41 Tumblewood wrote: maybe I could just go with the "never wrong on TvT arguments" theory and lynch amg and damdred. seems like a mighty easy play What's this theory? Thread shitfights are always TvT? >.> I'll admit I've never participated in one as scum, but I've seen cases of that happening. Me (town) vs rayn (scum) for example haha if i remember correctly he had like calix and me as tvt for our d1 argument. yeah:
On March 17 2017 23:50 Tumblewood wrote: ALSO disfo v calix is a TvT argument. no way scum!disfo goes into an argument against someone way more widely TR b/c he knows he won't win
On March 18 2017 00:54 Tumblewood wrote: you can poke holes in my TvT argument but I know I'm right, I've never missed a read like this. and if you are baffled by how else disfo could respond to an accusation, look at what I've done all game
|
On March 25 2017 19:52 disformation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2017 19:50 Xatalos wrote:On March 25 2017 11:41 Tumblewood wrote: maybe I could just go with the "never wrong on TvT arguments" theory and lynch amg and damdred. seems like a mighty easy play What's this theory? Thread shitfights are always TvT? >.> I'll admit I've never participated in one as scum, but I've seen cases of that happening. Me (town) vs rayn (scum) for example haha if i remember correctly he had like calix and me as tvt for our d1 argument.
Hm ok..
|
Ok, kind of makes sense I guess.
|
was skimming a bit through koshi's filter, but the only thing i found was his somewhat suspect readflip and vote D2, that i already pointed out. + Show Spoiler [in dat post] +On March 22 2017 19:42 disformation wrote:seems im stuck on phone for a while. so quoting n shit hard. so ill try to be concise n shit. Show nested quote +On March 22 2017 07:01 beentheredonethat wrote:D2 Final Vote Count raynpelikoneet (0) xatalos, calix, koshieden1892 (6): damdred, disformation, raynpelikoneet, koshi, onegu, xatalos, darthfoley, Calix, raynpelikoneetdisformation (1): Calix, darthfoley, xatalos, Tumblewood AMG (0): TumblewoodKoshi (0): TumblewoodXatalos (3): raynpelikoneet, AMG, Koshi, raynpelikoneet Not voting (1): Eden1892 so: ignoring tumble: as mentioned earlier: id say 2 scum on efen or 1 scum on eden 1 on xata. with tumble it can be tumble +1 eden. or tumble and 1 xata. looking at the xata wagon: rayn: given his read progression and everything it makes a lot of sense for him. also first on a wagon that makes a lot of sense for him to be on. not much to see. koshi:[-] hard flip of his read on xata. [+] posted good reasons to scum read xata [--] timing. koshi flipping the xata read and voting xata brought the votes to 4 eden, 3 disf, 3 xata. like he flipped vote and read precisely at a time where the xata train got a bit of steam and it seemed it might take of. so if xata is town this might point to a scum koshi. reminds me that i wanted to filter dive him. amg:a fuckton of wifom here. strangely more focused on defending eden than getting a specific person lynched. hard to tell if he just really thought eden is town or went for a huge wifom play. tinfoil sick play: xata/amg/eden for max wtf. would have liked it more if he had more actively tried to get a scumread lynched. so overall meh. so still not seeing it. either need a yuge tinfoil, oneg's meds or whatever tw is smoking. probably all three.
|
yeah him being stubborn about his tvt was also one of the points why i had a town lean based on tone on him D2. though he did flip his read on me D2, when he saw good points about me in koshis filter.
|
Hmm... Everyone alive now has some reason I think they're town. But obviously 2 are scum...
|
Like I think of a reason anyone could be scum - and I come up with 2 reasons for being town........ sucks
|
On March 25 2017 19:58 Xatalos wrote: Hmm... Everyone alive now has some reason I think they're town. But obviously 2 are scum... inb4 all vt after all xD
though dont think it is very likely
|
On March 25 2017 20:06 disformation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2017 19:58 Xatalos wrote: Hmm... Everyone alive now has some reason I think they're town. But obviously 2 are scum... inb4 all vt after all xD though dont think it is very likely
Heh yeah it's always the lingering doubt in the back of my head. I don't see a path for victory for them if that's the case though. Or do you?
|
not really. which is why i think it is very unlikely.
|
Yeah though they've both been my scumreads at different points, it's not really worth worrying too much about now.
|
|
|
|