|
On January 08 2017 03:59 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 03:45 Calix wrote:
Given the mass inactivity, trying to use the bigger picture is a very bad idea that's going to lead to faulty conclusions. That wasn't really my point. I'm concerned with how much of a circle jerk the thread is when there's a good chance that Swika is wrong on a lot of things. It's hard for me to pick out scum from sheep if everyone's opinion follows their sentiment.
Why are you not trying to convince us we are wrong then? Why are you not trying to move the game state forward and try to convince others?
|
On January 08 2017 04:05 ika42 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 03:57 beentheredonethat wrote:On January 08 2017 03:55 Calix wrote:On January 08 2017 03:52 beentheredonethat wrote:On January 08 2017 03:33 Calix wrote:On January 08 2017 03:30 beentheredonethat wrote:Hello everyone. I'm here. I have not read the game as I even didn't /confirm, however hosts weren't eager to wait for me. As I was pissed over things going on over in Host Mafia, I pretty much didn't visit TL over the course of the last 24 hours or so, only went online from mobile for a bit. So. This is my very first time in playing two games at once so I want to apologize in advance if I suck. I will catch up on the game in the next few hours, I'm at home in front of my desktop and I'm going to do my best to contribute.  Eww gross opening post with the preemptive excuse for shit play. You're hosting the other game Calix and you should know why I'm pissed as fuck. So either you're putting shit on me because you're scum or you haven't read up Host Mafia and are failing on your host duties which I don't think you are capable of at this point. Tell me, what kind of entry post is a "good entry post"? "Hello people, I am here and Calix is scum"? Okay. Hello people, I am here and Calix is scum. ##vote Calix This is a massive overreaction. I'm not going to respond to the part about hosting since that's referring to an ongoing game and is clearly attacking my character. It absolutely is a massive overreaction but so is your one-line response to my original entry. So if we could both settle down to a slower pace and be polite to each other then we could actually try to play this game. Of course we can also throw shit onto each other until something sticks to one of us. But I would prefer to actually have fun in this game. regarding your suppose host issue and the "who started it": + Show Spoiler +but the thing is that you have now brought in a host issue about another game on this site. I much would of rather prefered that you said "well somethings botyhering me but i cant dicuss it right now" or even say something about RL pissing you off. You kinda brought it on yourself to allow calix to attack you there when you jabed her about the host thing. While i don't know what it is nor do I care, nobody but you has fault. Thats all im saying on this. if theres a problem going on with hosting theres a sig i use all the time: There is a code us hosts have to live by and that is: we can't fix stupid or random decisions. Plz do not respond to this at all if you want to talk about his matter save it for post game. this is just my 2 cents on hosting matters that being said if you would like to actualy explain why calix is scum and talk about your reads here thats something im willing to do
+ Show Spoiler [rather offtopic] +
So either you're putting shit on me because you're scum or you haven't read up Host Mafia and are failing on your host duties which I don't think you are capable of at this point.
This is what I said. What I meant:
a) Calix is scum for calling me out on my bad entry although it's no bad entry
b) Calix genuinely doesn't know I wasn't around because she hasn't read up on Host Mafia which I don't want to blame her for as I don't think it is
however if it's for me, we can drop this topic now
|
On January 08 2017 04:06 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 04:02 Vivax wrote:
Been tempted a few times to put the thought out there that we might be dealing with an active, disruptive mafia (Calix), but then that thought shouldn't be pursued too early, especially by me or I end up tinfoiling the entire game.
So it's a thought on hold maybe I'll find something positive to take from her posts at some point. For now she doesn't look sheepable to me.
I think for today I would be content with a PL on ME, otherwise I still have my eyes on Kelsier and DF mostly as I might have been onto something at the start of the day, but today I feel like shit and am lazy to go dig for something and make a case, to be completely honest. What makes you think that? It would be good if you could expand on your reads at some point.
Ill let him answer firs then I will answer cus i can kinda agree with him to an extent.
|
On January 08 2017 04:06 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 04:02 Vivax wrote:
Been tempted a few times to put the thought out there that we might be dealing with an active, disruptive mafia (Calix), but then that thought shouldn't be pursued too early, especially by me or I end up tinfoiling the entire game.
So it's a thought on hold maybe I'll find something positive to take from her posts at some point. For now she doesn't look sheepable to me.
I think for today I would be content with a PL on ME, otherwise I still have my eyes on Kelsier and DF mostly as I might have been onto something at the start of the day, but today I feel like shit and am lazy to go dig for something and make a case, to be completely honest. What makes you think that? It would be good if you could expand on your reads at some point.
Kelsier for not seeming to care at this point and his negative comment about the game at the beginning. It's the sort of thing I saw Palmar going after people for and successfully catching mafia with it. So I think it could be a nice heuristic for catching mafia.
Foley for what I posted about him. Doesn't need expanding as it's in my filter.
As for you, I said I don't want to pursue that thought for now as you are still one of the most active players if not the most active player.
|
On January 08 2017 04:10 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 04:06 Calix wrote:On January 08 2017 04:02 Vivax wrote:
Been tempted a few times to put the thought out there that we might be dealing with an active, disruptive mafia (Calix), but then that thought shouldn't be pursued too early, especially by me or I end up tinfoiling the entire game.
So it's a thought on hold maybe I'll find something positive to take from her posts at some point. For now she doesn't look sheepable to me.
I think for today I would be content with a PL on ME, otherwise I still have my eyes on Kelsier and DF mostly as I might have been onto something at the start of the day, but today I feel like shit and am lazy to go dig for something and make a case, to be completely honest. What makes you think that? It would be good if you could expand on your reads at some point. Kelsier for not seeming to care at this point and his negative comment about the game at the beginning. It's the sort of thing I saw Palmar going after people for and successfully catching mafia with it. So I think it could be a nice heuristic for catching mafia. Foley for what I posted about him. Doesn't need expanding as it's in my filter. As for you, I said I don't want to pursue that thought for now as you are still one of the most active players if not the most active player.
Can you do it cus i want to see it. I doubt we have time in the day to do so but I want to see this though porcess. It might put my paranoia about you to ease
|
Activity isn't AI for me, it's just a thing.
I'm not a fan of the reads I've gotten. BTDT unnecessarily bringing up another game, then backing down when I refused to talk about it doesn't sit well with me.
However your read (that you're not explaining) is also off because of the timing of BTDT's. He posted a town-read of me and then you said after that "Calix might be mafia" with no backing so yeah, I want the read pls.
|
On January 08 2017 04:07 ika42 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 03:59 Grackaroni wrote:On January 08 2017 03:45 Calix wrote:
Given the mass inactivity, trying to use the bigger picture is a very bad idea that's going to lead to faulty conclusions. That wasn't really my point. I'm concerned with how much of a circle jerk the thread is when there's a good chance that Swika is wrong on a lot of things. It's hard for me to pick out scum from sheep if everyone's opinion follows their sentiment. Why are you not trying to convince us we are wrong then? Why are you not trying to move the game state forward and try to convince others?
Could you not? Thanks.
|
disfo would you mind to point out that poll post that you talk about?
|
aww fuck it, wrong thread again
|
On January 08 2017 03:11 Calix wrote:
It looks like all the active people have similar opinions so consolidation shouldn't be a problem.
That makes me paranoid, not satisfied
|
On January 08 2017 04:13 Calix wrote:
Activity isn't AI for me, it's just a thing.
I'm not a fan of the reads I've gotten. BTDT unnecessarily bringing up another game, then backing down when I refused to talk about it doesn't sit well with me.
However your read (that you're not explaining) is also off because of the timing of BTDT's. He posted a town-read of me and then you said after that "Calix might be mafia" with no backing so yeah, I want the read pls.
I was pissed at the hosts of the other game. You are one of the hosts of the other game.
This is why I didn't play this game. I also came back because I had confirmed this very game here.
As you called me out on saying exactly the above, I wanted to remind you that you are one of the hosts of the very game I was pissed about, meaning that you should know that I am speaking the truth and not making up some lame bullshit about why I wasn't there for the majority of D1.
I'm afraid that wasn't clear. If you have any questions, ask.
|
On January 08 2017 03:30 beentheredonethat wrote:Hello everyone. I'm here. I have not read the game as I even didn't /confirm, however hosts weren't eager to wait for me. As I was pissed over things going on over in Host Mafia, I pretty much didn't visit TL over the course of the last 24 hours or so, only went online from mobile for a bit. So. This is my very first time in playing two games at once so I want to apologize in advance if I suck. I will catch up on the game in the next few hours, I'm at home in front of my desktop and I'm going to do my best to contribute.
How does this happen two games in a row lol
|
On January 08 2017 04:17 beentheredonethat wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 04:13 Calix wrote:
Activity isn't AI for me, it's just a thing.
I'm not a fan of the reads I've gotten. BTDT unnecessarily bringing up another game, then backing down when I refused to talk about it doesn't sit well with me.
However your read (that you're not explaining) is also off because of the timing of BTDT's. He posted a town-read of me and then you said after that "Calix might be mafia" with no backing so yeah, I want the read pls. I was pissed at the hosts of the other game. You are one of the hosts of the other game. This is why I didn't play this game. I also came back because I had confirmed this very game here. As you called me out on saying exactly the above, I wanted to remind you that you are one of the hosts of the very game I was pissed about, meaning that you should know that I am speaking the truth and not making up some lame bullshit about why I wasn't there for the majority of D1. I'm afraid that wasn't clear. If you have any questions, ask.
If you have a legit problem then take it to PMs instead of talking about it in the game thread of a different game.
|
On January 08 2017 03:53 Vivax wrote:ME is someone of those who might as well not have signed up as clearly he doesn't like playing this game. Will have to be policied at some point cause he's not a source of information. Boston has this thing bugging me: Show nested quote +On January 07 2017 07:32 B0stonSC wrote:
Okay, so after catching up, I have a few things to respond on.
First, as to why I am not more active, is that I have not a whole lot of time to play mafia during the week, so what I am doing is catching up, responding to everything I feel needs a response, giving my reads, then getting back off. You may flame me for this, but unless it's the weekend this will be how I play. I do have a life you know, but mafia is a lot of fun (which is why I wanted to play it).
As to why I voted Onegu (asked three times, by my count), he has made a claim (with the first post of the game) and then posted a non informative post. That's all he has done. I wanted to see what happens if he gets a bit of pressure on him, but after this amount of time I feel that he is just inactive.
On to my reads, Kmatt feels very much a scummy player to me becuase he is posting quite a bit now, but it doesn't feel like he is accomplishing anything. DarthFoley seems waaaay too defensive, so that seems odd, but I'll keep looking at him so I can get a more solid read. Vivax and MichaelEhrmantraut seem a bit off. Nothing suspicious, but just a bit not quite correct to me. This is more of a gut read than anything else, so I'll be doing a reread (probably today) for just them to see what's up. Now it's weekend and he should be playing according to himself.
Kelsier did the same thing and no one seems to care besides me
|
On January 08 2017 04:18 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 04:17 beentheredonethat wrote:On January 08 2017 04:13 Calix wrote:
Activity isn't AI for me, it's just a thing.
I'm not a fan of the reads I've gotten. BTDT unnecessarily bringing up another game, then backing down when I refused to talk about it doesn't sit well with me.
However your read (that you're not explaining) is also off because of the timing of BTDT's. He posted a town-read of me and then you said after that "Calix might be mafia" with no backing so yeah, I want the read pls. I was pissed at the hosts of the other game. You are one of the hosts of the other game. This is why I didn't play this game. I also came back because I had confirmed this very game here. As you called me out on saying exactly the above, I wanted to remind you that you are one of the hosts of the very game I was pissed about, meaning that you should know that I am speaking the truth and not making up some lame bullshit about why I wasn't there for the majority of D1. I'm afraid that wasn't clear. If you have any questions, ask. If you have a legit problem then take it to PMs instead of talking about it in the game thread of a different game.
I realize now what your problem is.
I think that this topic is borderline close to violating the rules and what I tried (get Host!Calix to indirectly confirm Player!btdt being genuine) is not cool in a newbie game.
Of course you can scumread me for that attempt but I'd suggest we're not going deeper into the topic itself now?
|
On January 08 2017 04:14 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 04:07 ika42 wrote:On January 08 2017 03:59 Grackaroni wrote:On January 08 2017 03:45 Calix wrote:
Given the mass inactivity, trying to use the bigger picture is a very bad idea that's going to lead to faulty conclusions. That wasn't really my point. I'm concerned with how much of a circle jerk the thread is when there's a good chance that Swika is wrong on a lot of things. It's hard for me to pick out scum from sheep if everyone's opinion follows their sentiment. Why are you not trying to convince us we are wrong then? Why are you not trying to move the game state forward and try to convince others? Could you not? Thanks.
Not what? Show that your complaining about a game state and how you are basically admitting to not doing anything to fix the suppose problem?
|
You're starting to get on my tits here. You keep bringing it back to this topic instead of just...talking about something game-relevant...
|
On January 08 2017 04:18 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 03:30 beentheredonethat wrote:Hello everyone. I'm here. I have not read the game as I even didn't /confirm, however hosts weren't eager to wait for me. As I was pissed over things going on over in Host Mafia, I pretty much didn't visit TL over the course of the last 24 hours or so, only went online from mobile for a bit. So. This is my very first time in playing two games at once so I want to apologize in advance if I suck. I will catch up on the game in the next few hours, I'm at home in front of my desktop and I'm going to do my best to contribute. How does this happen two games in a row lol
First game I simply forgot about. Remember, it was around Christmas.
Second game I did not forget about (this one). I simply decided to start playing late as I didn't feel very motivated to TL Mafia at all.
Me coming late into the game is not scum indicative. I am not even a wagon or anything, I could've just chilled and voted at a point.
|
On January 08 2017 04:23 Calix wrote:
You're starting to get on my tits here. You keep bringing it back to this topic instead of just...talking about something game-relevant...
Instead of responding to this, just give a read or something.
|
On January 08 2017 04:23 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2017 04:23 Calix wrote:
You're starting to get on my tits here. You keep bringing it back to this topic instead of just...talking about something game-relevant... Instead of responding to this, just give a read or something.
You're town.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
