|
On October 10 2016 07:33 Damdred wrote:
Saying that my activity level is indicative of anything is folly at best and idiocy at worst.
For example I,have several scum games that have 15-30 pages who or at the same time I have some scum games with 1-5 pages. And these happen in indiscriminate means as I see fit.
The same can be said of my town game the range in which I post is high sometimes and low others.
Trying to draw conclusions based off activity and any type of excuses (that I'm attempting to keep out of thread) is ludicrous.
As such if you are town you should be happy I am here and will catch up. If you are scum keep being dumb.
Neither of us called your activity AI. Please quote where we did and I'll consider apologising.
And neither of us are using your sickness to read you.
|
There’s only one moment I noticed his tone being different, and it was in his interaction with bats. It was more inquisitive than his usual chummy-chummy tone. Overall he feels more distant this game. Was that what you had noticed?
Don’t think he was sick at the time and don’t think being sick makes the tone more inquisitive than usual.
I’ve noted this too. It’s a not the best argument as he may be trying a new play style or approaching the game differently (before he got his rolecard).
For instance, my play this game is nothing like any of the other games I’ve played before.
You are right that you are a hypocrite though. I can tell you that much c:
|
On October 10 2016 07:33 Damdred wrote:
Saying that my activity level is indicative of anything is folly at best and idiocy at worst.
For example I,have several scum games that have 15-30 pages who or at the same time I have some scum games with 1-5 pages. And these happen in indiscriminate means as I see fit.
The same can be said of my town game the range in which I post is high sometimes and low others.
Trying to draw conclusions based off activity and any type of excuses (that I'm attempting to keep out of thread) is ludicrous.
As such if you are town you should be happy I am here and will catch up. If you are scum keep being dumb.
I’m not saying that nobody said that your activity was AI, but nobody said that your activity was AI.
|
On October 10 2016 07:42 NeverUnlucky wrote:
There’s only one moment I noticed his tone being different, and it was in his interaction with bats. It was more inquisitive than his usual chummy-chummy tone. Overall he feels more distant this game. Was that what you had noticed?
Don’t think he was sick at the time and don’t think being sick makes the tone more inquisitive than usual.
I’ve noted this too. It’s a not the best argument as he may be trying a new play style or approaching the game differently (before he got his rolecard).
For instance, my play this game is nothing like any of the other games I’ve played before.
You are right that you are a hypocrite though. I can tell you that much c:
When people questioned him, he is bolder and has a stronger "go fuck yourself" kind of attitude. So kind of. He hasn't been involved at all so it's difficult to gauge but that seems to be absent from his play so far.
It's worth him explaining though imo.
Being a hypocrite is the best flaw. I can do whatever I want and nobody can call me scummy for it because I pull this shit as town. #bestplayer #mvp
|
On October 10 2016 07:12 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 06:31 Damdred wrote:
Hello, I have given my excuses but would rather keep it out of thread because it is nai.
I'm way behind to make any rational thought provoking posts so here's to reading 9x pages and watch all my friends turn against me. I for one don't like that he specifies that his inactivity is nai. It once again illustrates that he is hesitant because he is sort of defending himself against a complaint that can be made on his play when it has not been made. This reminds me of a comment scum!Eggy made in his last game: "Im sorry for being afk most of D1 I was busy which is not AI." guilty
This post basically condemns me for activity without overtly stateing it.
And your reads on me for the both of you are horribly bad as per usual. And might I add saying he's never inquisitive or the like is foolish as neither of you know anything of me past one game.
Even the fame bats quoted I was inquisitive.
|
On October 10 2016 07:56 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 07:12 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 10 2016 06:31 Damdred wrote:
Hello, I have given my excuses but would rather keep it out of thread because it is nai.
I'm way behind to make any rational thought provoking posts so here's to reading 9x pages and watch all my friends turn against me. I for one don't like that he specifies that his inactivity is nai. It once again illustrates that he is hesitant because he is sort of defending himself against a complaint that can be made on his play when it has not been made. This reminds me of a comment scum!Eggy made in his last game: "Im sorry for being afk most of D1 I was busy which is not AI." guilty This post basically condemns me for activity without overtly stateing it. And your reads on me for the both of you are horribly bad as per usual. And might I add saying he's never inquisitive or the like is foolish as neither of you know anything of me past one game. Even the fame bats quoted I was inquisitive.
No it doesn't. He's saying that you're defending yourself against an accusation before it has been made.
Counter-point. Why is it "as per usual" for us to have bad reads on you when we've only been in one game together yet us calling you non-inquisitive is bad because we've been in one game together?
|
And it is sort of funny saying my play lacks x or y when I have only played for like 5 hours maybe? Which granted is changing but that's neither here or,there, and I am not shackled to one play style in any regards.
|
On October 10 2016 07:56 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 07:12 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 10 2016 06:31 Damdred wrote:
Hello, I have given my excuses but would rather keep it out of thread because it is nai.
I'm way behind to make any rational thought provoking posts so here's to reading 9x pages and watch all my friends turn against me. I for one don't like that he specifies that his inactivity is nai. It once again illustrates that he is hesitant because he is sort of defending himself against a complaint that can be made on his play when it has not been made. This reminds me of a comment scum!Eggy made in his last game: "Im sorry for being afk most of D1 I was busy which is not AI." guilty This post basically condemns me for activity without overtly stateing it.
Read again.
And your reads on me for the both of you are horribly bad as per usual. And might I add saying he's never inquisitive or the like is foolish as neither of you know anything of me past one game.
So we cannot know anything about you for having played one game with you, but you can say our reads on you are bad as per usual?
|
Shitty laggy website makes my posting so slow that Calix ninja's me every time, zzz.
|
Mind meld.
I'm fit to drop. I trust NU can lead the interrogation in my absence.
Don't forget to let him have some time to give his own thoughts outside of a defense, however.
Goodnight.
|
On October 10 2016 07:59 Damdred wrote:
And it is sort of funny saying my play lacks x or y when I have only played for like 5 hours maybe? Which granted is changing but that's neither here or,there, and I am not shackled to one play style in any regards.
?
What is X and what is y? I don't remember anyone saying your play lacked anything.
|
I don't know how far you are Damdred. But you are pretty defensive and aggressive for somebody who hasn't read the thread yet. Why?
|
On October 10 2016 08:08 Koshi wrote:
I don't know how far you are Damdred. But you are pretty defensive and aggressive for somebody who hasn't read the thread yet. Why?
Cause I hate being scum read for what I consider shifty reasons.
|
On October 10 2016 08:06 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 07:59 Damdred wrote:
And it is sort of funny saying my play lacks x or y when I have only played for like 5 hours maybe? Which granted is changing but that's neither here or,there, and I am not shackled to one play style in any regards. ? What is X and what is y? I don't remember anyone saying your play lacked anything.
Just the previous page calix tried to compare my assortment of posts to the last game.
|
On October 10 2016 08:32 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 08:08 Koshi wrote:
I don't know how far you are Damdred. But you are pretty defensive and aggressive for somebody who hasn't read the thread yet. Why? Cause I hate being scum read for what I consider shifty reasons.
You did not mind it last game.
|
If you scum read me it honestly can only be for Poe (or should be). And that reasoning is somewhat ok, trying to,over explain and nit pick like what 8 posts to justify a lynch past policy isn't justifiable imo.
But that's neither here or their.
|
On October 10 2016 08:34 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 08:32 Damdred wrote:On October 10 2016 08:08 Koshi wrote:
I don't know how far you are Damdred. But you are pretty defensive and aggressive for somebody who hasn't read the thread yet. Why? Cause I hate being scum read for what I consider shifty reasons. You did not mind it last game.
Than you are blind and I thought the reasons were so shifty that I ignored half of what was going on and attacked people?
|
On October 10 2016 08:35 Damdred wrote:
If you scum read me it honestly can only be for Poe (or should be). And that reasoning is somewhat ok, trying to,over explain and nit pick like what 8 posts to justify a lynch past policy isn't justifiable imo.
But that's neither here or their.
All of the cases I've seen so far were based on less than 8 'nit-picked' posts. There's no over-explanation in my filter dive of you.
Why could someone tr you iyo?
Who do you see as scum from where you're at?
On October 10 2016 08:36 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 08:34 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 10 2016 08:32 Damdred wrote:On October 10 2016 08:08 Koshi wrote:
I don't know how far you are Damdred. But you are pretty defensive and aggressive for somebody who hasn't read the thread yet. Why? Cause I hate being scum read for what I consider shifty reasons. You did not mind it last game. Than you are blind and I thought the reasons were so shifty that I ignored half of what was going on and attacked people?
I don't recall you attacking anybody in that game.
|
Then you obviously didn't read the game or most of my antagonistic drivel towards yourself or calix the entirety of the first two days.
And I have no clue honestly what the cases on me are, if any of them are what I consider to be legitimate reasoning I will talk of those, but what you and calix have talked about the past two pages doesn't make me scum, or anyone scum.
|
[From my filter]
I've read Damdred's filter. He's lock scum to me.
On October 05 2016 03:34 Damdred wrote:
Stutters
Bats
Super
Hf
Is my scum pool currently. I'm somewhat more confident in almost everyone else being town.
3 flipped town, other is a guy who had made 4 posts from which 2 were questions. Scummiest player in the game?
Awful scum pool.
On October 05 2016 03:38 Damdred wrote:
Like stutters feels more like a policy lynch with how sideline and active he is (or isn't in this case) so if we have to policy lynch we should do him.
Bats I think is on the sideline and is just posting things to exist basically. His one tinfoil isn't enough and I don't really see him sticking his neck,out and he's super agreeable and right in the middle on certain subjects (hf I believe) he also asked several questions that seemed not to,go anywhere.
I'd rather lynch bats atm
Bats was one of the few to scum-read Damdred with me day 1. He has not been agreeable nor in "the middle on certain objects".
What tinfoil?
Bats was not posting things just to exist. That is actually what Damdred has done. Same goes for his point about questions leading nowhere.
That is one bad scum-read.
On October 05 2016 03:41 Damdred wrote:
Hf probably going to rage on me to which will be sad and I do just do nit think super and hf will be on the same scum team with how super just name dropped him so easily.
Also super even when using the lurker d1 stool had decent posts when we last played instead here kind of seems like he is wanting to poke marv to rage instead of doing anything interesting.
Kind of think super is scum.
Very hesitant in his read.
Super's interaction with marv (re: "TMI'ing Calix as town") was in no way something that Super made in an attempt to make marv rage.
On October 05 2016 05:25 Damdred wrote:
I will say I've missed the marv sassiness in my life.
Grack could be scum to,I guess he's not been to amazing yet, but I have a higher view of his scum game than his town game over all.
Like as scum I generally see him as mire proactive and leading away while. I'm not sure lazy Grack makes me sad (and I think more likely town by my experience so far)
Hesitation.
On October 05 2016 05:28 Damdred wrote:
Hi marv.
Did you disagree with anything I've thought so far?
Interesting that he chose to say DISAGREE over AGREE. As in he expected marv to disagree. Again, this shows how hestiant he is.
On October 05 2016 07:08 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 06:56 NeverUnlucky wrote:
I don't like Damdred's posts and would scum-read him for it, but I not trust this read myself. It's basically based on the same arguments I scum-read him HM3 (in which he was town), so I guess his town meta could just appear scummy to me. You just do not have good taste then since even calix town reads me. Maybe I'm wrong about NU being town I'm unsure now based on him reading the game opposite how he would idk.
"Even Calix town-reads me" What is this supposed to mean? It's as if he was trying to convince me to TR him because Calix did. Absolutely shit argument.
What does he know about how I would read the game?
Hestitant read.
I've seen zero town motivation in his posts. I would like to hear why Koshi and Calix TR the guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
