EPT[M][N]A Wonderful Normal Game of Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
 | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 03 2016 22:17 Shapelog wrote: Be careful, Vig might shoot you again if you are lacking. If there is a vig a course .Actually, Might check something about this post. Hi, JAS from the Normal Game? Yeah I learned my lesson that time. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 04 2016 04:30 Killing wrote: I like: kushhill marv I do not like: Shape Ricey I have terrible reasons for all of these and probably will not disclose cause they make me sound like an idiot but since no one is talking yep Username checks out ; ) | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 04 2016 07:33 Shapelog wrote: Fazer clan. (great pun btw if he is scum) What is your clan (you) thinking of? I don't know how to pun, explain please? | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
I legit didnt know what Clan FaZe meant so I had no idea what it was in reference too ^^ (I know what a pun is) :D | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
.. Its hard for me to care.about inactives when they have made no contributions. I didnt mean to say I dont care about inactives such that I would not kill them. That was poor wording on my part. Sorry! | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 04 2016 23:00 justanothertownie wrote: So you think Killings posts since you made that read were also scummy? I still really do not understand this read. All I said in my previous post was that he is pointing fingers for useless reasons. Is that so hard to understand? | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post ! And to address your question I don't think his posts afterwards were scummy. At the very least the initial posts he made caught my attention. I'm not out to get the guy, just attempted to make a read myself with what little we have! Thanks! | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
 Just doing what I can to contribute lol, now I look like a fool. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
Anyways I'll be checking in periodically throughout the day. At work during 830-530 in the office EST so I can't guarantee quick replies. Thanks! | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
Correct. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
 @Etellex: I stated a few pages back that 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM I am working (full time) so while I am on a computer, my time to browse TL is quite limited. Also, welcome to the game! :D | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 05 2016 03:30 Fazers wrote: @Shapelog: He makes better reads than I do @Etellex: I stated a few pages back that 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM I am working (full time) so while I am on a computer, my time to browse TL is quite limited. Also, welcome to the game! :D Wtf? I've said that I'm at work a bunch of times. That's why I'm in and out of this thread right now. Yes I've been reading your posts - why are you so insistent on people's opinion of me and trying to make them suspicious of me after I had voted you initially based off potential inactivity? I was going to change my vote after your initial post but you keep pushing to have people side against me. That's why I ain't changing. @shapelog - no offense taken lol I deserved that fully. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 05 2016 23:15 Shapelog wrote: Before I forget, Since I forgot, Fazer, you must now answer this. What is your current read on me, and anyone else that you feel you want to mention? I have no reads on you, except you are suspicious of me which I can totally understand. My reasonings for Killing were a bit weak and nonsensical looking back. I'm a bit skeptical of Etellex though, I think that his reasonings are even worse than mine. At least I tried...his really has no substance. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
I should be good later tonight. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 05 2016 05:49 Etellex wrote: I'm not too afraid to post, I just don't have any new information to present. Furthermore, I have a tight schedule and this is going to have to be my last post and thus I am forced to cast my vote now. I trust Mig's judgment and arguments. See you tomorrow. ##vote: tubesock I didn't want to vote for Tubesock without reason. At that point in time, he was clearly going to be the one to be lynched with how much time was left. I feel Etellex vote is based simply by following the majority. Scum blending in with town? | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 05 2016 05:59 Fazers wrote: Wtf? I've said that I'm at work a bunch of times. That's why I'm in and out of this thread right now. Yes I've been reading your posts - why are you so insistent on people's opinion of me and trying to make them suspicious of me after I had voted you initially based off potential inactivity? I was going to change my vote after your initial post but you keep pushing to have people side against me. That's why I ain't changing. @shapelog - no offense taken lol I deserved that fully. But then again you didn't vote for me, why? | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 06 2016 05:18 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: wait... so you're saying people voting etellex were possibly scum blending in with town. which would make etellex town. Yet you are expressing suspicions of etellex above. No I am saying that Etellex voting for Tubesock can be seen has a scum blending in with the town, because Tubesock had the majority on luck. Where do I mention at all people voting for Etellex??? @Shapelog no I have not...Perhaps I can take a look. Regardless, just because I think you're a strong player = / = you not scum. I never said I'd leave you out of my lynch pool | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
I wonder why Tubesock changed votes to DrP... Then again I forgot DrP even existed. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 06 2016 05:27 Shapelog wrote: Well you gave me a D1 pass onto the bus towards D2. So i was out of your lynch pool Day 1  Touche, sir. On May 06 2016 05:27 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: @fazers ok. So why didn't you put your vote on etellex rather than mig? Hey Kush, I definitely admit that I should have trusted my guts, but did not. I think that was my biggest mistake of the day so far. Too bad I only feel this way after the fact that Tubesock confirmed to be VT. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 07 2016 05:10 Shapelog wrote: Oh yeah Fazer, I forgot about him lol. Hi there Shapelog. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
As implied in my previous posts(look through my filter), I am pretty confident he is scum. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
Marv confirmed town. I still don't see why Palmar was scum though I need to read some of his posts. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
RIP marv - thanks for your contributions. Although you didnt' like my filters :'( | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 12 2016 13:40 Mig wrote: Where is fazers. HI. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
##unvote ##vote Etellex | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
On May 13 2016 01:04 justanothertownie wrote: I won't tolerate this attitude in my town. Play the fucking game or die. I am. Fuck off my case. | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
Did you even role check me? Hahaha what the fuck. Now there's no way I look like the villain here. I'm townie but nothing I can say to convince y'all. Oh well~ best of luck on finding scum! I still say Etellex. :-) | ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
736 Posts
| ||
| ||
