|
On May 05 2016 23:15 Shapelog wrote:Before I forget, Show nested quote +On May 04 2016 22:15 Shapelog wrote:On May 04 2016 10:31 Fazers wrote:To address your questions: I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass.  Your first post of content on TL. Gratz. Keeping your options on me open I see. Idk, how I am a strong player, but w/e. What Necessary is your opinion on me (I am guessing it relates to the game, and is not he is a strong player) But also gj. Most of the time, as scum, I just get a free pass. However, by the laws of pushing, you will now be forced to read me at EOD (deadline) today.About Killing, On May 04 2016 11:09 Fazers wrote:
Yeah I was just throwing it out there. I don't actually have any determination to make sure Killing gets lynched. However, why are the accusations not bold? He's making reads off such little information. He even admits he may sound like an idiot for not like a few posters on his list...it's baseless.
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! Technically it is not, it is a feel read. Basically a feel read can be true or false, and as a video mafia player, it makes sense for him to be doing so. I kinda do not understand your read on him as well. As you say something you like from him, yet are sus. of him. And kinda do the same thing he did, which is what you find sus. in him. Since I forgot, Fazer, you must now answer this. What is your current read on me, and anyone else that you feel you want to mention?
I have no reads on you, except you are suspicious of me which I can totally understand. My reasonings for Killing were a bit weak and nonsensical looking back.
I'm a bit skeptical of Etellex though, I think that his reasonings are even worse than mine. At least I tried...his really has no substance.
|
Also sorry guys - I had no Internet at my house overnight so I was unable to post
I should be good later tonight.
|
United States4714 Posts
Fazers why did you just leave your vote on me and not switch? You posted after I did but still didnt change.
|
@Mig, Unlike Etellex, who posted
On May 05 2016 05:49 Etellex wrote:
I'm not too afraid to post, I just don't have any new information to present. Furthermore, I have a tight schedule and this is going to have to be my last post and thus I am forced to cast my vote now. I trust Mig's judgment and arguments. See you tomorrow.
##vote: tubesock
I didn't want to vote for Tubesock without reason. At that point in time, he was clearly going to be the one to be lynched with how much time was left. I feel Etellex vote is based simply by following the majority. Scum blending in with town?
|
Also,
On May 05 2016 05:59 Fazers wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 03:30 Fazers wrote:@Shapelog: He makes better reads than I do  @Etellex: I stated a few pages back that 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM I am working (full time) so while I am on a computer, my time to browse TL is quite limited. Also, welcome to the game! :D Wtf? I've said that I'm at work a bunch of times. That's why I'm in and out of this thread right now. Yes I've been reading your posts - why are you so insistent on people's opinion of me and trying to make them suspicious of me after I had voted you initially based off potential inactivity? I was going to change my vote after your initial post but you keep pushing to have people side against me. That's why I ain't changing. @shapelog - no offense taken lol I deserved that fully.
But then again you didn't vote for me, why?
|
On May 06 2016 05:01 Fazers wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 23:15 Shapelog wrote:Before I forget, On May 04 2016 22:15 Shapelog wrote:On May 04 2016 10:31 Fazers wrote:To address your questions: I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass. Your first post of content on TL. Gratz. Keeping your options on me open I see. Idk, how I am a strong player, but w/e. What Necessary is your opinion on me (I am guessing it relates to the game, and is not he is a strong player) But also gj. Most of the time, as scum, I just get a free pass. However, by the laws of pushing, you will now be forced to read me at EOD (deadline) today.About Killing, On May 04 2016 11:09 Fazers wrote:
Yeah I was just throwing it out there. I don't actually have any determination to make sure Killing gets lynched. However, why are the accusations not bold? He's making reads off such little information. He even admits he may sound like an idiot for not like a few posters on his list...it's baseless.
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! Technically it is not, it is a feel read. Basically a feel read can be true or false, and as a video mafia player, it makes sense for him to be doing so. I kinda do not understand your read on him as well. As you say something you like from him, yet are sus. of him. And kinda do the same thing he did, which is what you find sus. in him. Since I forgot, Fazer, you must now answer this. What is your current read on me, and anyone else that you feel you want to mention? I have no reads on you, except you are suspicious of me which I can totally understand. My reasonings for Killing were a bit weak and nonsensical looking back. I'm a bit skeptical of Etellex though, I think that his reasonings are even worse than mine. At least I tried...his really has no substance.
So If I might be able to continue being narcissistic, what made you want to keep me alive passed D1?
On May 04 2016 10:31 Fazers wrote:To address your questions: I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass.
Ik you said I was a strong player, yet, I can still be scum. So kinda leaving me out of the D1 lynch pool for that reason doesn't make sense now that you do not have a read on me.
Also, have you read a scum game i was in? I do not think you have, yet, you might surprise me.
|
On May 06 2016 05:12 Fazers wrote:@Mig, Unlike Etellex, who posted Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 05:49 Etellex wrote:
I'm not too afraid to post, I just don't have any new information to present. Furthermore, I have a tight schedule and this is going to have to be my last post and thus I am forced to cast my vote now. I trust Mig's judgment and arguments. See you tomorrow.
##vote: tubesock I didn't want to vote for Tubesock without reason. At that point in time, he was clearly going to be the one to be lynched with how much time was left. I feel Etellex vote is based simply by following the majority. Scum blending in with town?
wait... so you're saying people voting etellex were possibly scum blending in with town.
which would make etellex town.
Yet you are expressing suspicions of etellex above.
|
On May 06 2016 05:18 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2016 05:12 Fazers wrote:@Mig, Unlike Etellex, who posted On May 05 2016 05:49 Etellex wrote:
I'm not too afraid to post, I just don't have any new information to present. Furthermore, I have a tight schedule and this is going to have to be my last post and thus I am forced to cast my vote now. I trust Mig's judgment and arguments. See you tomorrow.
##vote: tubesock I didn't want to vote for Tubesock without reason. At that point in time, he was clearly going to be the one to be lynched with how much time was left. I feel Etellex vote is based simply by following the majority. Scum blending in with town? wait... so you're saying people voting etellex were possibly scum blending in with town. which would make etellex town. Yet you are expressing suspicions of etellex above.
No I am saying that Etellex voting for Tubesock can be seen has a scum blending in with the town, because Tubesock had the majority on luck. Where do I mention at all people voting for Etellex???
@Shapelog no I have not...Perhaps I can take a look.
Regardless, just because I think you're a strong player = / = you not scum. I never said I'd leave you out of my lynch pool
|
|
|
On May 06 2016 05:12 Fazers wrote:@Mig, Unlike Etellex, who posted Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 05:49 Etellex wrote:
I'm not too afraid to post, I just don't have any new information to present. Furthermore, I have a tight schedule and this is going to have to be my last post and thus I am forced to cast my vote now. I trust Mig's judgment and arguments. See you tomorrow.
##vote: tubesock I didn't want to vote for Tubesock without reason. At that point in time, he was clearly going to be the one to be lynched with how much time was left. I feel Etellex vote is based simply by following the majority. Scum blending in with town?
It could be, Tho, Tube wasn't that locked in yet. In fact, Slam's vote could of gotten Etellex lynched if it was on time.
It is more like a survival vote tbh, and that is hard to analyze as both alignments will do it. Hell, Tumblewood (A obs this game) is litterlay known for survival voting as town, and was scum read hard for not doing it on D1 in a game lately.
|
On May 06 2016 05:24 Fazers wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2016 05:18 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 06 2016 05:12 Fazers wrote:@Mig, Unlike Etellex, who posted On May 05 2016 05:49 Etellex wrote:
I'm not too afraid to post, I just don't have any new information to present. Furthermore, I have a tight schedule and this is going to have to be my last post and thus I am forced to cast my vote now. I trust Mig's judgment and arguments. See you tomorrow.
##vote: tubesock I didn't want to vote for Tubesock without reason. At that point in time, he was clearly going to be the one to be lynched with how much time was left. I feel Etellex vote is based simply by following the majority. Scum blending in with town? wait... so you're saying people voting etellex were possibly scum blending in with town. which would make etellex town. Yet you are expressing suspicions of etellex above. No I am saying that Etellex voting for Tubesock can be seen has a scum blending in with the town, because Tubesock had the majority on luck. Where do I mention at all people voting for Etellex??? @Shapelog no I have not...Perhaps I can take a look. Regardless, just because I think you're a strong player = / = you not scum. I never said I'd leave you out of my lynch pool
Well you gave me a D1 pass onto the bus towards D2. So i was out of your lynch pool Day 1 
|
@fazers
ok. So why didn't you put your vote on etellex rather than mig?
|
Hmm looking at the vote history, you're actually right.
I wonder why Tubesock changed votes to DrP...
Then again I forgot DrP even existed.
|
On May 06 2016 05:27 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2016 05:24 Fazers wrote:On May 06 2016 05:18 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 06 2016 05:12 Fazers wrote:@Mig, Unlike Etellex, who posted On May 05 2016 05:49 Etellex wrote:
I'm not too afraid to post, I just don't have any new information to present. Furthermore, I have a tight schedule and this is going to have to be my last post and thus I am forced to cast my vote now. I trust Mig's judgment and arguments. See you tomorrow.
##vote: tubesock I didn't want to vote for Tubesock without reason. At that point in time, he was clearly going to be the one to be lynched with how much time was left. I feel Etellex vote is based simply by following the majority. Scum blending in with town? wait... so you're saying people voting etellex were possibly scum blending in with town. which would make etellex town. Yet you are expressing suspicions of etellex above. No I am saying that Etellex voting for Tubesock can be seen has a scum blending in with the town, because Tubesock had the majority on luck. Where do I mention at all people voting for Etellex??? @Shapelog no I have not...Perhaps I can take a look. Regardless, just because I think you're a strong player = / = you not scum. I never said I'd leave you out of my lynch pool Well you gave me a D1 pass onto the bus towards D2. So i was out of your lynch pool Day 1
Touche, sir.
On May 06 2016 05:27 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
@fazers
ok. So why didn't you put your vote on etellex rather than mig?
Hey Kush, I definitely admit that I should have trusted my guts, but did not. I think that was my biggest mistake of the day so far. Too bad I only feel this way after the fact that Tubesock confirmed to be VT.
|
@Fazers
You voted Mig for being afk. He came back from afk and was quite active. You saw that. Why didn't you change your vote to someone who was afk or someone you thought was scummy?
|
On May 06 2016 05:30 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
@Fazers
You voted Mig for being afk. He came back from afk and was quite active. You saw that. Why didn't you change your vote to someone who was afk or someone you thought was scummy?
He already said this,
On this page.
Are you done parroting Mig?
|
|
|
On May 06 2016 05:32 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2016 05:30 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
@Fazers
You voted Mig for being afk. He came back from afk and was quite active. You saw that. Why didn't you change your vote to someone who was afk or someone you thought was scummy? He already said this, On this page. Are you done parroting Mig?
On May 06 2016 05:03 Mig wrote:
Fazers why did you just leave your vote on me and not switch? You posted after I did but still didnt change.
Same Page.
Fazer responds
Kush makes a post, then posts
On May 06 2016 05:27 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
@fazers
ok. So why didn't you put your vote on etellex rather than mig?
On May 06 2016 05:30 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
@Fazers
You voted Mig for being afk. He came back from afk and was quite active. You saw that. Why didn't you change your vote to someone who was afk or someone you thought was scummy?
And you still have to answer the question about why you think I am afraid of you.
|
ya my bad lol. sorry fazer. that reasoning for keeping your vote on mig is pretty bad but it fits with your newbie town persona decently.
|
@shapelog. I thought you were afraid because you were afk for the last several hours mostly. lol I know how dumb that is.
also because where's the interaction between us! You care about what fazer has to say but not me. Either you don't love me anymore or you are scum and fear that our intimacy will give you away. And I choose to believe the latter, if only so my fragile self-worth won't be shattered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
