EPT[M][N]A Wonderful Normal Game of Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Fazers
734 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
 | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
On May 03 2016 22:17 Shapelog wrote: Be careful, Vig might shoot you again if you are lacking. If there is a vig a course .Actually, Might check something about this post. Hi, JAS from the Normal Game? Yeah I learned my lesson that time. | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
On May 04 2016 04:30 Killing wrote: I like: kushhill marv I do not like: Shape Ricey I have terrible reasons for all of these and probably will not disclose cause they make me sound like an idiot but since no one is talking yep Username checks out ; ) | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
On May 04 2016 07:33 Shapelog wrote: Fazer clan. (great pun btw if he is scum) What is your clan (you) thinking of? I don't know how to pun, explain please? | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
I legit didnt know what Clan FaZe meant so I had no idea what it was in reference too ^^ (I know what a pun is) :D | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
I want to lynch Killing possibly, he's making a bit of noise. I guess activity is pretty good early on to form initiative, but a lot of bold accusations imo. I don't care about people who are inactive in this game so far. It's been a little quiet. I have a strong opinion about Shapelog - imo he's a strong player from my observations. Thus I will not vote to lynch him on Day 1. However, that may change as days pass. | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
Activity and making reads though is definitely awesome on his part though! | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
| ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
.. Its hard for me to care.about inactives when they have made no contributions. I didnt mean to say I dont care about inactives such that I would not kill them. That was poor wording on my part. Sorry! | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
On May 04 2016 23:00 justanothertownie wrote: So you think Killings posts since you made that read were also scummy? I still really do not understand this read. All I said in my previous post was that he is pointing fingers for useless reasons. Is that so hard to understand? | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
On May 04 2016 22:55 Fazers wrote: I am suspect of Killing but have no good reasons to confirm my suspicion he is scum. Id rather him alive than an inactive who hasnt made even one post ! And to address your question I don't think his posts afterwards were scummy. At the very least the initial posts he made caught my attention. I'm not out to get the guy, just attempted to make a read myself with what little we have! Thanks! | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
 Just doing what I can to contribute lol, now I look like a fool. | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
Anyways I'll be checking in periodically throughout the day. At work during 830-530 in the office EST so I can't guarantee quick replies. Thanks! | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
Correct. | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
 @Etellex: I stated a few pages back that 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM I am working (full time) so while I am on a computer, my time to browse TL is quite limited. Also, welcome to the game! :D | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
On May 05 2016 03:30 Fazers wrote: @Shapelog: He makes better reads than I do @Etellex: I stated a few pages back that 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM I am working (full time) so while I am on a computer, my time to browse TL is quite limited. Also, welcome to the game! :D Wtf? I've said that I'm at work a bunch of times. That's why I'm in and out of this thread right now. Yes I've been reading your posts - why are you so insistent on people's opinion of me and trying to make them suspicious of me after I had voted you initially based off potential inactivity? I was going to change my vote after your initial post but you keep pushing to have people side against me. That's why I ain't changing. @shapelog - no offense taken lol I deserved that fully. | ||
|
Fazers
734 Posts
On May 05 2016 23:15 Shapelog wrote: Before I forget, Since I forgot, Fazer, you must now answer this. What is your current read on me, and anyone else that you feel you want to mention? I have no reads on you, except you are suspicious of me which I can totally understand. My reasonings for Killing were a bit weak and nonsensical looking back. I'm a bit skeptical of Etellex though, I think that his reasonings are even worse than mine. At least I tried...his really has no substance. | ||
| ||
