|
United Kingdom36158 Posts
On March 01 2016 00:35 Shapelog wrote: I already have come to the conclusion that Team Koshi, is really just 2 trolls having a fun time. we'll see. Koshi always plays to win eventually (as town)
|
It doesn't change it really. Just have to wait and see on koshi if he stays that lurker meh.
Anyway I have town vibes from Marv but he won't let me cuddle up to him.
|
On March 01 2016 00:46 Damdred wrote: It doesn't change it really. Just have to wait and see on koshi if he stays that lurker meh.
Anyway I have town vibes from Marv but he won't let me cuddle up to him.
I thought he already has a cuddle buddy? Also I admit it would be hard for any being to cuddle a screen for extensive periods of time.
|
On March 01 2016 00:50 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 00:46 Damdred wrote: It doesn't change it really. Just have to wait and see on koshi if he stays that lurker meh.
Anyway I have town vibes from Marv but he won't let me cuddle up to him.
I thought he already has a cuddle buddy? Also I admit it would be hard for any being to cuddle a screen for extensive periods of time.
That it is.. Cold too.
|
On March 01 2016 00:38 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 00:35 Shapelog wrote: I already have come to the conclusion that Team Koshi, is really just 2 trolls having a fun time. we'll see. Koshi always plays to win eventually (as town) Will you lynch Ticktock with me? For science?
|
I do wonder how much nutritional value a Blahvacado has.
|
United Kingdom36158 Posts
On March 01 2016 01:25 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 00:38 marvellosity wrote:On March 01 2016 00:35 Shapelog wrote: I already have come to the conclusion that Team Koshi, is really just 2 trolls having a fun time. we'll see. Koshi always plays to win eventually (as town) Will you lynch Ticktock with me? For science? maybe later 
what's the science?
|
On March 01 2016 00:03 Damdred wrote: Which advice did you think was scummy? please read this
On March 01 2016 00:09 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On February 29 2016 23:55 qob wrote: @Shape it wasnt his joke, it was his "advice" that makes me susp. So this post right? Show nested quote +On February 29 2016 12:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: 1 lurker + 1 active is definitely a scum trait this game. It's a cheap way to limit information (only have one gut player to go off of) while still having the team participate and influence decisions (second player contributing by QT). With the follow up of: Show nested quote +On February 29 2016 13:00 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On February 29 2016 12:57 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 29 2016 12:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: 1 lurker +1 active is definitely a scum trait this game. It's a cheap way to limit information (only have one gut player to go off of) while still having the team participate and influence decisions (second player contributing by QT). Disagree unless it's intentional. I don't think lurking is any scummier than in normal games. 1 active and 1 lurker is less Scummy than 2 lurkers, 2 lurkers is very Scummy because it makes it less likely that the lurking is due to irl, and more likely that it is due to the stresses of being scum. I did mean intentional lurking, but otherwise I actually agree with you. If you look at what I bolded in the 1st quoted post. I admit, there is something weird with the timing of that. Since Team Koshi posted a feel moments before: Show nested quote +On February 29 2016 10:44 Koshi wrote: I have decided to not post in this thread but just post in our QT. I am not sure what to think about it tbh. It feels a bit too coincidental that UON mentions a scum trait that fits one teams play style. On the same page. Maybe he was trying to respond to it? But no one was really raising a eye at it and in that case he would post "Team Koshi...."
That is the post
|
On March 01 2016 01:27 Shapelog wrote: I do wonder how much nutritional value a Blahvacado has. Well if we're going by content then he's about as nutritious as stale cardboard...
|
On March 01 2016 01:28 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 01:25 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 01 2016 00:38 marvellosity wrote:On March 01 2016 00:35 Shapelog wrote: I already have come to the conclusion that Team Koshi, is really just 2 trolls having a fun time. we'll see. Koshi always plays to win eventually (as town) Will you lynch Ticktock with me? For science? maybe later  what's the science? I'm testing my Ticktock meta. I think he's probably more likely mafia than not based on his entrance. I basically don't even care what he says from here out.
|
United Kingdom36158 Posts
On March 01 2016 01:29 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 01:28 marvellosity wrote:On March 01 2016 01:25 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 01 2016 00:38 marvellosity wrote:On March 01 2016 00:35 Shapelog wrote: I already have come to the conclusion that Team Koshi, is really just 2 trolls having a fun time. we'll see. Koshi always plays to win eventually (as town) Will you lynch Ticktock with me? For science? maybe later  what's the science? I'm testing my Ticktock meta. I think he's probably more likely mafia than not based on his entrance. I basically don't even care what he says from here out. I must admit, I like my science to be a little more rigorous <3
|
But I skimmed through at least 4 games to arrive at it! The science is sound, friend.
|
On March 01 2016 01:28 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 01:27 Shapelog wrote: I do wonder how much nutritional value a Blahvacado has. Well if we're going by content then he's about as nutritious as stale cardboard...
|
United Kingdom36158 Posts
On March 01 2016 01:32 VisceraEyes wrote: But I skimmed through at least 4 games to arrive at it! The science is sound, friend. it is?
On February 29 2016 22:42 VisceraEyes wrote: Glancing at Ticktock's last few towngames, his tone is starkly different this game. However in his most recent scumgame he looks more like he's trying to emulate his townplay rather than just not give a fuck.
Ehhhhh. Ima leave it for now. See what they say.
|
On March 01 2016 01:28 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 01:27 Shapelog wrote: I do wonder how much nutritional value a Blahvacado has. Well if we're going by content then he's about as nutritious as stale cardboard...
Same for us all at the moment, no? Game hasn't really picked up yet.
|
...sound within a reasonable margin of error?
COME ON, ITS THE BEST THING IN THE THREAD AND YOU KNOW IT. Did you even read his last few games marv? Did you?
|
On March 01 2016 01:28 qob wrote:please read this Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 00:09 Shapelog wrote:On February 29 2016 23:55 qob wrote: @Shape it wasnt his joke, it was his "advice" that makes me susp. So this post right? On February 29 2016 12:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: 1 lurker + 1 active is definitely a scum trait this game. It's a cheap way to limit information (only have one gut player to go off of) while still having the team participate and influence decisions (second player contributing by QT). With the follow up of: On February 29 2016 13:00 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On February 29 2016 12:57 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On February 29 2016 12:01 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: 1 lurker +1 active is definitely a scum trait this game. It's a cheap way to limit information (only have one gut player to go off of) while still having the team participate and influence decisions (second player contributing by QT). Disagree unless it's intentional. I don't think lurking is any scummier than in normal games. 1 active and 1 lurker is less Scummy than 2 lurkers, 2 lurkers is very Scummy because it makes it less likely that the lurking is due to irl, and more likely that it is due to the stresses of being scum. I did mean intentional lurking, but otherwise I actually agree with you. If you look at what I bolded in the 1st quoted post. I admit, there is something weird with the timing of that. Since Team Koshi posted a feel moments before: On February 29 2016 10:44 Koshi wrote: I have decided to not post in this thread but just post in our QT. I am not sure what to think about it tbh. It feels a bit too coincidental that UON mentions a scum trait that fits one teams play style. On the same page. Maybe he was trying to respond to it? But no one was really raising a eye at it and in that case he would post "Team Koshi...." That is the post
Qob, how would you compare Sentinel's entry posts to your own teammate, Sandroba, his entry posts?
Did you realize FF is Sentinel's partner?
|
On March 01 2016 01:35 Spikasaur wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2016 01:28 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 01 2016 01:27 Shapelog wrote: I do wonder how much nutritional value a Blahvacado has. Well if we're going by content then he's about as nutritious as stale cardboard... Same for us all at the moment, no? Game hasn't really picked up yet. Not the same. Ticktock has been here posting. Poorly. It's un-town-Ticktock.
|
On March 01 2016 01:35 VisceraEyes wrote: ...sound within a reasonable margin of error?
COME ON, ITS THE BEST THING IN THE THREAD AND YOU KNOW IT. Did you even read his last few games marv? Did you? I got raped by Scum TT...twice....I do not have to read the games to remember. As much as I would love to vote out of spite. I hate to vote purely on meta.
|
United Kingdom36158 Posts
On March 01 2016 01:35 VisceraEyes wrote: ...sound within a reasonable margin of error?
COME ON, ITS THE BEST THING IN THE THREAD AND YOU KNOW IT. Did you even read his last few games marv? Did you? I identified him as mafia in a game I vaguely watched recently, and it was based on the content, rather than "he doesn't look like any game he's played yet"
What's with the hard sell, babycakes?
|
|
|
|