| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mr Darcy
73 Posts
On February 11 2016 15:02 GargamelxD wrote: people voting ls eh lynchbait will be lynch bait even behind a smurf going to figure out his alignment This is kind of how I felt, but I do think the points against bhaal are valid. Why do you think he is lynchbait? | ||
|
GargamelxD
59 Posts
either way i think goldrom is VA and i want to kill him with fire ##Vote 77Goldrom | ||
|
Mr Darcy
73 Posts
On February 11 2016 15:57 GargamelxD wrote: he could be SL maybe, either that or ls either way i think goldrom is VA and i want to kill him with fire ##Vote 77Goldrom ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Hge0ky5.jpg) | ||
|
GargamelxD
59 Posts
expand on gargamel and rom are bad and then this post | ||
|
Mr Darcy
73 Posts
On February 11 2016 16:50 GargamelxD wrote: expand on gargamel and rom are bad and then this post Both of your types of lurking were meh And then you voted the other lurker for a reason that came from the same wild blue sky as Boros | ||
|
GargamelxD
59 Posts
| ||
|
GargamelxD
59 Posts
so i guess after realizing that im willing to vote both, and its not LS | ||
|
keanuisgod
271 Posts
| ||
|
keanuisgod
271 Posts
On February 11 2016 19:45 GargamelxD wrote: And Bhaals opinion of him doesnt make any sense (his opinion of me and not-opinion on rom). what he said about me he could say about rom and yet he thinks im more likely mafia. so i guess after realizing that im willing to vote both, and its not LS Actually what he said about you could also be said about unholy, not Gold On February 11 2016 14:10 Bhaal LoM wrote: Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame I didn't care for this post from him: He didn't try to analyze anything at all and he havne't posted anything since that post and it kind of worrisome. But his other content seems meh. Idk if it warrants a vote because sometimes townies are well lurkers. On February 10 2016 19:51 unholyflare wrote: I don't make anything of the arguments that have gone on. I'll return later in case something interesting happened. Bhaal, why be suspicious of Garga and not unholy when they basically made the same exact post (which made you find Garga suspicious)? @Garga: Your focus right now is on the "relative" lurkers. What about the more active players? Is there some active scum running around we can't seem to notice? | ||
|
GargamelxD
59 Posts
in rom you have a guy who apologizes for being late, claims his role, asks about the latest news and in the next post acts like he doesnt care. | ||
|
Bhaal LoM
54 Posts
On February 11 2016 21:41 keanuisgod wrote: Actually what he said about you could also be said about unholy, not Gold Bhaal, why be suspicious of Garga and not unholy when they basically made the same exact post (which made you find Garga suspicious)? @Garga: Your focus right now is on the "relative" lurkers. What about the more active players? Is there some active scum running around we can't seem to notice? I will admit that prior to your post I didn't check unholyflare's filter probably NAI I guess. | ||
|
nnn_thekushmountains
1501 Posts
And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? Like if any of the lurkers are scum prob is Gargame | ||
|
Valdiano
16 Posts
for saita's posts top of page 8 - not necessarily. and I also came to a different conclusion on nnn - he did smurfhunting but he's going about it with a purpose, and he made that clear. I'm reading filters and if I can tell you are using smurfhunting to actually advance the game for town, you're going to get a townread most likely. if you want to use other methods to do the same, that's fine too. scum don't necessarily need to blend in with the given conversation you mentioned either especially if it becomes obvious they are posting just to post when you are reading filters. not taking a stance can be scummy - you could very well be hedging. and the posts in question were in the thick of conversation with nnn/warlock. that was the other thing I looked at before making that conclusion. | ||
|
Bhaal LoM
54 Posts
On February 11 2016 22:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Bhaal, And 77gold? You didn't check his filter either? Doesn't this quote from you imply that you compared all of the lurkers, garg(lurker that point in time), 77goldrom, and unholy? I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. | ||
|
nnn_thekushmountains
1501 Posts
On February 11 2016 22:40 Bhaal LoM wrote: I did check gold's filter and I thought his content was meh. Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? | ||
|
Bhaal LoM
54 Posts
On February 11 2016 22:46 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Are you going to do stuff on your own, or do you want to be directed with questions? I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\ | ||
|
nnn_thekushmountains
1501 Posts
On February 11 2016 22:49 Bhaal LoM wrote: I more a person who needs direction I will be honest with that :\ Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity? Who do you want to lynch and why? | ||
|
Bhaal LoM
54 Posts
On February 11 2016 22:54 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: Do you still want to lynch gargamel after his recent activity? Who do you want to lynch and why? garg stuff from last night made him look better in my opinion. I don't want to lynch him atm unless something major comes up. On who to lynch: I don't know man to many lurkers >.< I normally hunt better when we got a lot of content(I was always a good late game player). | ||
|
nnn_thekushmountains
1501 Posts
On February 11 2016 22:59 Bhaal LoM wrote: garg stuff from last night made him look better in my opinion. I don't want to lynch him atm unless something major comes up. On who to lynch: I don't know man to many lurkers >.< I normally hunt better when we got a lot of content(I was always a good late game player). So why not join garg in voting 77goldrom? At the very least it would get rid of a lurker. | ||
|
Bhaal LoM
54 Posts
On February 11 2016 23:09 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: So why not join garg in voting 77goldrom? At the very least it would get rid of a lurker. Because if he flips town then we got little to no info unless you talking about the people who voted for him. Also lurking is NAI for the most part anyways. | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
IntoTheTV X SOOP
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
IntoTheTV X SOOP
FEL
FEL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
